Flament M, Guelfi J D
Médecin Adjoint, Hôpital International de l'Université de Paris.
Encephale. 1989 Mar-Apr;15(2 Spec No):213-8.
Systematic assessment of bulimia, alike the clinical definition of the disorder, is still meager and lacks reliability. Development of new evaluation instruments is the focus of many current researches. This article will distinguish: rating scales specific of bulimia, for screening in epidemiological surveys and clinical practice, as well as for measure of the severity of the symptoms; structured interviews for evaluation of bulimic patients, for clinical and research use; eating disorders rating scales, already used for anorexia nervosa; other rating scales of interest with bulimic patients; and more possible evaluation methods. Finally, we will review assessment measures for use in treatment studies of bulimia.
与该疾病的临床定义一样,对贪食症的系统评估仍然不足且缺乏可靠性。开发新的评估工具是当前许多研究的重点。本文将区分:用于在流行病学调查和临床实践中进行筛查以及测量症状严重程度的特定于贪食症的评定量表;用于评估贪食症患者的结构化访谈,供临床和研究使用;已用于神经性厌食症的饮食失调评定量表;与贪食症患者相关的其他评定量表;以及更多可能的评估方法。最后,我们将回顾用于贪食症治疗研究的评估措施。