Place Benjamin J, Perkins Matt J, Sinclair Ewan, Barsamian Adam L, Blakemore Paul R, Field Jennifer A
Department of Chemistry, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.
Department of Environmental and Molecular Toxicology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.
Deep Sea Res 2 Top Stud Oceanogr. 2016 Jul;129:273-281. doi: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2014.01.015. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
After the April 2010 explosion on the Deepwater Horizon oil rig, and subsequent release of millions of barrels of oil, two Corexit oil dispersant formulations were used in unprecedented quantities both on the surface and sub-surface of the Gulf of Mexico. Although the dispersant formulations contain four classes of surfactants, current studies to date focus on the anionic surfactant, bis-(2-ethylhexyl) sulfosuccinate (DOSS). Factors affecting the integrity of environmental and laboratory samples for Corexit analysis have not been systematically investigated. For this reason, a quantitative analytical method was developed for the detection of all four classes of surfactants, as well as the hydrolysis products of DOSS, the enantiomeric mixture of α- and β-ethylhexyl sulfosuccinate (α-/β-EHSS). The analytical method was then used to evaluate which practices for sample collection, storage, and analysis resulted in high quality data. Large volume, direct injection of seawater followed by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) minimized analytical artifacts, analysis time, and both chemical and solid waste. Concentrations of DOSS in the seawater samples ranged from 71 - 13,000 ng/L, while the nonionic surfactants including Span 80, Tween 80, Tween 85 were detected infrequently (26% of samples) at concentrations from 840 - 9100 ng/L. The enantiomers α-/β-EHSS were detected in seawater, at concentrations from 200 - 1,900 ng/L, and in both Corexit dispersant formulations, indicating α-/β-EHSS were applied to the oil spill and may be not unambiguous indicator of DOSS degradation. Best practices are provided to ensure sample integrity and data quality for environmental monitoring studies and laboratory that require the detection and quantification of Corexit-based surfactants in seawater.
2010年4月“深水地平线”石油钻井平台发生爆炸,随后数百万桶石油泄漏,两种Corexit石油分散剂配方以前所未有的数量被用于墨西哥湾的海面和海面以下。尽管这些分散剂配方包含四类表面活性剂,但迄今为止的现有研究主要集中在阴离子表面活性剂双(2-乙基己基)磺基琥珀酸盐(DOSS)上。影响用于Corexit分析的环境和实验室样品完整性的因素尚未得到系统研究。因此,开发了一种定量分析方法,用于检测所有四类表面活性剂以及DOSS的水解产物α-和β-乙基己基磺酸盐(α-/β-EHSS)的对映体混合物。然后使用该分析方法来评估哪些样品采集、储存和分析方法能够产生高质量的数据。大体积直接进样海水后进行液相色谱串联质谱分析(LC-MS/MS)可最大程度减少分析假象、分析时间以及化学和固体废物。海水样品中DOSS的浓度范围为71 - 13,000 ng/L,而包括司盘80、吐温80、吐温85在内的非离子表面活性剂很少被检测到(占样品的26%),浓度范围为840 - 9100 ng/L。在海水中检测到α-/β-EHSS对映体,浓度范围为200 - 1,900 ng/L,在两种Corexit分散剂配方中也检测到了,这表明α-/β-EHSS已被应用于石油泄漏事件中,可能不是DOSS降解的明确指标。本文提供了最佳做法,以确保在需要检测和定量海水中基于Corexit的表面活性剂的环境监测研究和实验室中,样品的完整性和数据质量。