Suppr超能文献

泌尿生殖医学诊所中四种细胞学采样技术的比较。

A comparison of four cytological sampling techniques in a genitourinary medicine clinic.

作者信息

Szarewski A, Cuzick J, Nayagam M, Thin R N

机构信息

Department of Genitourinary Medicine, St Thomas' Hospital, London.

出版信息

Genitourin Med. 1990 Dec;66(6):439-43. doi: 10.1136/sti.66.6.439.

Abstract

Four cytological sampling techniques (the Ayre's spatula alone, the Ayelesbury spatula, the Ayre's spatula in conjunction with a Cytobrush (Medscand), and the Cervex (Steriseal] were compared when used in a genitourinary medicine clinic. Over a period of two years 6991 smears were taken. No difference was found between the methods with regard to detection of dyskaryosis, although there were significant differences in the percentage of smears containing endocervical cells.

摘要

在一家泌尿生殖医学诊所对四种细胞学采样技术(单独使用艾尔刮匙、埃尔斯伯里刮匙、艾尔刮匙联合细胞刷(Medscand)以及Cervex(Steriseal))进行了比较。在两年的时间里共采集了6991份涂片。尽管在含有宫颈管内膜细胞的涂片百分比方面存在显著差异,但在检测核异质方面,这些方法之间未发现差异。

相似文献

10
Cervical cytology: a randomized comparison of four sampling methods.宫颈细胞学检查:四种采样方法的随机对照比较
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Jun;166(6 Pt 1):1772-7; discussion 1777-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(92)91568-u.

本文引用的文献

7
Ayre v Aylesbury cervical spatulas.艾尔诉艾尔斯伯里宫颈刮片案。
Genitourin Med. 1989 Jun;65(3):161-2. doi: 10.1136/sti.65.3.161.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验