Kwon Jaymin, Weisel Clifford P, Morandi Maria T, Stock Thomas H
California State University, Fresno Department of Public Health, 2345 E. San Ramon Ave. M/S MH30, Fresno, CA 93740, USA.
Rutgers University, Environmental and Occupational Health Science Institute, Department of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, 170 Frelinghuysen Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Dec 15;573:954-964. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.186. Epub 2016 Sep 4.
Concentrations of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) measured outside homes in Houston, TX and Los Angeles, CA were characterized by the effects of source proximity and meteorological factors. Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, m,p-xylene, o-xylene (BTEX), methyl tert butyl ether (MTBE), tetrachloroethylene (perchloroethylene, PCE), and carbon tetrachloride (CCl) were examined. Multiple stepwise regression analysis converged the best-fit models with predictors from meteorological conditions and the proximity to specific point, area, and mobile sources on the residential outdoor VOC concentrations. Negative associations of wind speed with concentrations demonstrated the effect of dilution by high wind speed. Atmospheric stability increase was associated with concentration increase. Petrochemical source proximity was a significant predictor for BTEX and MTBE concentrations in Houston. Ethylbenzene and xylene source proximity was a significant predictor in Los Angeles. Close proximity to area sources such as scrap metal recycling or dry cleaning facilities increased the MTBE, PCE, and CCl concentrations in Houston and Los Angeles. Models for ethylbenzene, m,p-xylene, and MTBE in Houston, and benzene in Los Angeles explained that for the median values of the meteorological factors, homes closest to influential highways would have concentrations that were 1.7-2.2 fold higher than those furthest from these mobile emission sources. If the median distance to sources were used in the models, the VOC concentrations varied 1.7 to 6.6 fold as the meteorological conditions varied over the observed range. These results highlight that each urban area is unique and localized sources need to be carefully evaluated to understand potential contributions to VOC air concentrations near residences, which influence baseline indoor air concentrations and personal exposures. Results of this study could assist in the appropriate design of monitoring networks for community-level sampling. They may also improve the accuracy of exposure models linking emission sources with estimated pollutant concentrations at the residential level.
在德克萨斯州休斯顿市和加利福尼亚州洛杉矶市的家庭外部测量的挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)浓度,其特征受源的接近程度和气象因素的影响。对苯、甲苯、乙苯、间/对二甲苯、邻二甲苯(BTEX)、甲基叔丁基醚(MTBE)、四氯乙烯(全氯乙烯,PCE)和四氯化碳(CCl₄)进行了检测。多元逐步回归分析将最佳拟合模型与来自气象条件以及与特定点源、面源和移动源的接近程度的预测因子相结合,用于住宅室外VOC浓度的分析。风速与浓度的负相关表明了高风速的稀释作用。大气稳定性增加与浓度增加相关。在休斯顿,石化源的接近程度是BTEX和MTBE浓度的重要预测因子。在洛杉矶,乙苯和二甲苯源的接近程度是重要预测因子。在休斯顿和洛杉矶,靠近金属回收或干洗设施等面源会增加MTBE、PCE和CCl₄的浓度。休斯顿的乙苯、间/对二甲苯和MTBE以及洛杉矶的苯的模型表明,对于气象因素的中值,距离有影响的高速公路最近的家庭的浓度比距离这些移动排放源最远的家庭高1.7 - 2.2倍。如果在模型中使用到源的中值距离,随着气象条件在观测范围内变化,VOC浓度变化1.7至6.6倍。这些结果突出表明每个城市地区都是独特的,需要仔细评估本地源,以了解其对住宅附近VOC空气浓度的潜在贡献,这会影响室内空气浓度基线和个人暴露情况。本研究结果有助于社区层面采样监测网络的合理设计。它们还可能提高将排放源与住宅层面估计污染物浓度联系起来的暴露模型的准确性。