Kujala Rainer, Glerean Enrico, Pan Raj Kumar, Jääskeläinen Iiro P, Sams Mikko, Saramäki Jari
Department of Computer Science, Aalto University, PO Box 15400, FI-00076, Aalto, Finland.
Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University, Aalto, Finland.
Eur J Neurosci. 2016 Nov;44(9):2673-2684. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13392. Epub 2016 Sep 25.
Networks have become a standard tool for analyzing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. In this approach, brain areas and their functional connections are mapped to the nodes and links of a network. Even though this mapping reduces the complexity of the underlying data, it remains challenging to understand the structure of the resulting networks due to the large number of nodes and links. One solution is to partition networks into modules and then investigate the modules' composition and relationship with brain functioning. While this approach works well for single networks, understanding differences between two networks by comparing their partitions is difficult and alternative approaches are thus necessary. To this end, we present a coarse-graining framework that uses a single set of data-driven modules as a frame of reference, enabling one to zoom out from the node- and link-level details. As a result, differences in the module-level connectivity can be understood in a transparent, statistically verifiable manner. We demonstrate the feasibility of the method by applying it to networks constructed from fMRI data recorded from 13 healthy subjects during rest and movie viewing. While independently partitioning the rest and movie networks is shown to yield little insight, the coarse-graining framework enables one to pinpoint differences in the module-level structure, such as the increased number of intra-module links within the visual cortex during movie viewing. In addition to quantifying differences due to external stimuli, the approach could also be applied in clinical settings, such as comparing patients with healthy controls.
网络已成为分析功能磁共振成像(fMRI)数据的标准工具。在这种方法中,脑区及其功能连接被映射到网络的节点和链接上。尽管这种映射降低了基础数据的复杂性,但由于节点和链接数量众多,理解所得网络的结构仍然具有挑战性。一种解决方案是将网络划分为模块,然后研究模块的组成以及与脑功能的关系。虽然这种方法对单个网络效果良好,但通过比较两个网络的划分来理解它们之间的差异却很困难,因此需要其他方法。为此,我们提出了一个粗粒度框架,该框架使用一组数据驱动的模块作为参考框架,使人们能够从节点和链接级别的细节中抽身出来。结果,可以以一种透明的、可统计验证的方式理解模块级连接的差异。我们通过将该方法应用于由13名健康受试者在休息和观看电影期间记录的fMRI数据构建的网络,证明了该方法的可行性。虽然独立划分休息和电影网络几乎无法提供有价值的见解,但粗粒度框架使人们能够确定模块级结构的差异,例如在观看电影期间视觉皮层内模块内链接数量的增加。除了量化由于外部刺激引起的差异外,该方法还可应用于临床环境,例如比较患者与健康对照。