Kowalewski Karl-Friedrich, Hendrie Jonathan D, Schmidt Mona W, Garrow Carly R, Bruckner Thomas, Proctor Tanja, Paul Sai, Adigüzel Davud, Bodenstedt Sebastian, Erben Andreas, Kenngott Hannes, Erben Young, Speidel Stefanie, Müller-Stich Beat P, Nickel Felix
Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Department of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Surg Endosc. 2017 May;31(5):2155-2165. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5213-2. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
Training and assessment outside of the operating room is crucial for minimally invasive surgery due to steep learning curves. Thus, we have developed and validated the sensor- and expert model-based laparoscopic training system, the iSurgeon.
Participants of different experience levels (novice, intermediate, expert) performed four standardized laparoscopic knots. Instruments and surgeons' joint motions were tracked with an NDI Polaris camera and Microsoft Kinect v1. With frame-by-frame image analysis, the key steps of suturing and knot tying were identified and registered with motion data. Construct validity, concurrent validity, and test-retest reliability were analyzed. The Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) was used as the gold standard for concurrent validity.
The system showed construct validity by discrimination between experience levels by parameters such as time (novice = 442.9 ± 238.5 s; intermediate = 190.1 ± 50.3 s; expert = 115.1 ± 29.1 s; p < 0.001), total path length (novice = 18,817 ± 10318 mm; intermediate = 9995 ± 3286 mm; expert = 7265 ± 2232 mm; p < 0.001), average speed (novice = 42.9 ± 8.3 mm/s; intermediate = 52.7 ± 11.2 mm/s; expert = 63.6 ± 12.9 mm/s; p < 0.001), angular path (novice = 20,573 ± 12,611°; intermediate = 8652 ± 2692°; expert = 5654 ± 1746°; p < 0.001), number of movements (novice = 2197 ± 1405; intermediate = 987 ± 367; expert = 743 ± 238; p < 0.001), number of movements per second (novice = 5.0 ± 1.4; intermediate = 5.2 ± 1.5; expert = 6.6 ± 1.6; p = 0.025), and joint angle range (for different axes and joints all p < 0.001). Concurrent validity of OSATS and iSurgeon parameters was established. Test-retest reliability was given for 7 out of 8 parameters. The key steps "wrapping the thread around the instrument" and "needle positioning" were most difficult to learn.
Validity and reliability of the self-developed sensor-and expert model-based laparoscopic training system "iSurgeon" were established. Using multiple parameters proved more reliable than single metric parameters. Wrapping of the needle around the thread and needle positioning were identified as difficult key steps for laparoscopic suturing and knot tying. The iSurgeon could generate automated real-time feedback based on expert models which may result in shorter learning curves for laparoscopic tasks. Our next steps will be the implementation and evaluation of full procedural training in an experimental model.
由于学习曲线陡峭,手术室之外的培训和评估对于微创手术至关重要。因此,我们开发并验证了基于传感器和专家模型的腹腔镜训练系统——iSurgeon。
不同经验水平(新手、中级、专家)的参与者进行了四个标准化的腹腔镜打结操作。使用NDI Polaris相机和微软Kinect v1跟踪器械和外科医生的关节运动。通过逐帧图像分析,确定了缝合和打结的关键步骤,并将其与运动数据进行匹配。分析了结构效度、同时效度和重测信度。客观结构化技术技能评估(OSATS)被用作同时效度的金标准。
该系统通过诸如时间(新手=442.9±238.5秒;中级=190.1±50.3秒;专家=115.1±29.1秒;p<0.001)、总路径长度(新手=18,817±10318毫米;中级=9995±3286毫米;专家=7265±2232毫米;p<0.001)、平均速度(新手=42.9±8.3毫米/秒;中级=52.7±11.2毫米/秒;专家=63.6±12.9毫米/秒;p<0.001)、角路径(新手=20,573±12,611°;中级=8652±2692°;专家=5654±1746°;p<0.001)、动作数量(新手=2197±1405;中级=987±367;专家=743±238;p<0.001)、每秒动作数量(新手=5.0±1.4;中级=5.2±1.5;专家=6.6±1.6;p=0.025)以及关节角度范围(针对不同轴和关节,所有p<0.001)等参数区分经验水平,显示出结构效度。确立了OSATS与iSurgeon参数的同时效度。8个参数中有7个给出了重测信度。“将线缠绕在器械上”和“针定位”这两个关键步骤最难掌握。
基于传感器和专家模型的自行开发的腹腔镜训练系统“iSurgeon”的效度和信度得以确立。使用多个参数比单一指标参数更可靠。将针缠绕在线上和针定位被确定为腹腔镜缝合和打结的困难关键步骤。iSurgeon可以基于专家模型生成自动实时反馈,这可能会缩短腹腔镜任务的学习曲线。我们的下一步将是在实验模型中实施和评估完整的程序训练。