Wimmer Klaus, Spinelli Philip, Pasternak Tatiana
Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer 08036 Barcelona, Spain, and.
Department of Neuroscience and Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14642.
J Neurosci. 2016 Sep 7;36(36):9351-64. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0843-16.2016.
Visual decisions often involve comparisons of sequential stimuli that can appear at any location in the visual field. The lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC) in nonhuman primates, shown to play an important role in such comparisons, receives information about contralateral stimuli directly from sensory neurons in the same hemisphere, and about ipsilateral stimuli indirectly from neurons in the opposite hemisphere. This asymmetry of sensory inputs into the LPFC poses the question of whether and how its neurons incorporate sensory information arriving from the two hemispheres during memory-guided comparisons of visual motion. We found that, although responses of individual LPFC neurons to contralateral stimuli were stronger and emerged 40 ms earlier, they carried remarkably similar signals about motion direction in the two hemifields, with comparable direction selectivity and similar direction preferences. This similarity was also apparent around the time of the comparison between the current and remembered stimulus because both ipsilateral and contralateral responses showed similar signals reflecting the remembered direction. However, despite availability in the LPFC of motion information from across the visual field, these "comparison effects" required for the comparison stimuli to appear at the same retinal location. This strict dependence on spatial overlap of the comparison stimuli suggests participation of neurons with localized receptive fields in the comparison process. These results suggest that while LPFC incorporates many key aspects of the information arriving from sensory neurons residing in opposite hemispheres, it continues relying on the interactions with these neurons at the time of generating signals leading to successful perceptual decisions.
Visual decisions often involve comparisons of sequential visual motion that can appear at any location in the visual field. We show that during such comparisons, the lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC) contains accurate representation of visual motion from across the visual field, supplied by motion processing neurons. However, at the time of comparison, LPFC neurons can only use this information to compute the differences between the stimuli, if stimuli appear at the same retinal location, implicating neurons with localized receptive fields in the comparison process. These findings show that sensory comparisons rely on the interactions between LPFC and sensory neurons that not only supply sensory signals but also actively participate in the comparison of these signals at the time of the decision.
视觉决策通常涉及对序列刺激的比较,这些刺激可出现在视野中的任何位置。已证明,非人类灵长类动物的外侧前额叶皮层(LPFC)在此类比较中起重要作用,它直接从同一半球的感觉神经元接收关于对侧刺激的信息,并间接从对侧半球的神经元接收关于同侧刺激的信息。这种LPFC感觉输入的不对称性提出了一个问题,即在视觉运动的记忆引导比较过程中,其神经元是否以及如何整合来自两个半球的感觉信息。我们发现,尽管单个LPFC神经元对对侧刺激的反应更强且提前40毫秒出现,但它们在两个半视野中携带的关于运动方向的信号非常相似,具有相当的方向选择性和相似的方向偏好。这种相似性在当前刺激与记忆刺激比较时也很明显,因为同侧和对侧反应都显示出反映记忆方向的相似信号。然而,尽管LPFC可获取来自整个视野的运动信息,但这些比较刺激要出现在相同的视网膜位置才会产生这些“比较效应”。这种对比较刺激空间重叠的严格依赖表明,具有局部感受野的神经元参与了比较过程。这些结果表明,虽然LPFC整合了来自位于对侧半球的感觉神经元的许多关键信息,但在产生导致成功感知决策的信号时,它仍依赖于与这些神经元的相互作用。
视觉决策通常涉及对可出现在视野中任何位置的序列视觉运动的比较。我们表明,在此类比较过程中,外侧前额叶皮层(LPFC)包含由运动处理神经元提供的来自整个视野的视觉运动的准确表征。然而,在比较时,LPFC神经元只有在刺激出现在相同视网膜位置时,才能利用这些信息计算刺激之间的差异,这意味着具有局部感受野的神经元参与了比较过程。这些发现表明,感觉比较依赖于LPFC与感觉神经元之间的相互作用,这些感觉神经元不仅提供感觉信号,而且在决策时积极参与这些信号的比较。