Menes Tehillah S, Kerlikowske Karla, Lange Jane, Jaffer Shabnam, Rosenberg Robert, Miglioretti Diana L
Department of Surgery, Tel Aviv-Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel2Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco4Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco.
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Jan 1;3(1):36-41. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.3022.
Atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) is a known risk factor for breast cancer. Published risk estimates are based on cohorts that included women whose ADH was diagnosed before widespread use of screening mammograms and did not differentiate between the methods used to diagnose ADH, which may be related to the size of the ADH focus. These risks may overestimate the risk in women with presently diagnosed ADH.
To examine the risk of invasive cancer associated with ADH diagnosed using core needle biopsy vs excisional biopsy.
A cohort study was conducted comparing the 10-year cumulative risk of invasive breast cancer in 955 331 women undergoing mammography with and without a diagnosis of ADH. Data were obtained from 5 breast imaging registries that participate in the National Cancer Institute-funded Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.
Diagnosis of ADH on core needle biopsy or excisional biopsy in women undergoing mammography.
Ten-year cumulative risk of invasive breast cancer.
The sample included 955 331 women with 1727 diagnoses of ADH, 1058 (61.3%) of which were diagnosed by core biopsy and 635 (36.8%) by excisional biopsy. The mean (interquartile range) age of the women at diagnosis was 52.6 (46.9-60.4) years. From 1996 to 2012, the proportion of ADH diagnosed by core needle biopsy increased from 21% to 77%. Ten years following a diagnosis of ADH, the cumulative risk of invasive breast cancer was 2.6 (95% CI, 2.0-3.4) times higher than the risk in women with no ADH. Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed via excisional biopsy was associated with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 3.0 (95% CI, 2-4.5) and, via core needle biopsy, with an adjusted HR of 2.2 (95% CI, 1.5-3.4). Ten years after an ADH diagnosis, an estimated 5.7% (95% CI, 4.3%-10.1%) of the women had a diagnosis of invasive cancer. Women with ADH diagnosed on excisional biopsy had a slightly higher risk (6.7%; 95% CI, 3.0%-12.8%) compared with those with ADH diagnosed via core needle biopsy (5%; 95% CI, 2.2%-8.9%).
Current 10-year risks of invasive breast cancer after a diagnosis of ADH may be lower than those previously reported. The risk associated with ADH is slightly lower for women whose ADH was diagnosed by needle core biopsy compared with excisional biopsy.
非典型导管增生(ADH)是已知的乳腺癌风险因素。已发表的风险估计基于一些队列研究,这些队列中的女性ADH诊断发生在乳腺钼靶筛查广泛应用之前,并且没有区分诊断ADH所使用的方法,而这可能与ADH病灶大小有关。这些风险可能高估了目前诊断为ADH的女性的风险。
探讨使用粗针活检与切除活检诊断的ADH相关的浸润性癌风险。
进行了一项队列研究,比较955331名接受乳腺钼靶检查且有或无ADH诊断的女性发生浸润性乳腺癌的10年累积风险。数据来自5个参与美国国立癌症研究所资助的乳腺癌监测联盟的乳腺影像登记处。
接受乳腺钼靶检查的女性通过粗针活检或切除活检诊断为ADH。
浸润性乳腺癌的10年累积风险。
样本包括955331名女性,其中1727例诊断为ADH,其中1058例(61.3%)通过粗针活检诊断,635例(36.8%)通过切除活检诊断。诊断时女性的平均(四分位间距)年龄为52.6(46.9 - 60.4)岁。从1996年到2012年,通过粗针活检诊断的ADH比例从21%增至77%。ADH诊断后10年,浸润性乳腺癌的累积风险比无ADH的女性高2.6(95%CI,2.0 - 3.4)倍。通过切除活检诊断的非典型导管增生的校正风险比(HR)为3.0(95%CI,2 - 4.5),通过粗针活检诊断的校正HR为2.2(95%CI,1.5 - 3.4)。ADH诊断后10年,估计5.7%(95%CI,4.3% - 10.1%)的女性被诊断为浸润性癌。通过切除活检诊断为ADH的女性的风险略高于通过粗针活检诊断为ADH的女性(6.7%;95%CI,3.0% - 12.8%),后者为5%(95%CI,2.2% - 8.9%)。
目前ADH诊断后浸润性乳腺癌的10年风险可能低于先前报道的风险。与切除活检诊断的ADH相比,粗针活检诊断为ADH的女性相关风险略低。