Northrup Thomas F, Greer Tracy L, Walker Robrina, Rethorst Chad D, Warden Diane, Stotts Angela L, Trivedi Madhukar H
Department of Family and Community Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX 75390-9119, USA.
Addict Behav. 2017 Jan;64:137-142. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.08.040. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
Missing data in substance use disorder (SUD) research pose a significant threat to internal validity. Participants terminate involvement or become less likely to attend intervention and research visits for many reasons, which should be addressed prior to becoming problematic. During a 9-month study targeting stimulant abuse, early dropouts and participant reported attendance barriers led to implementing a structured, pre-randomization protocol with participants about retention and solution-focused strategies (the "Fireside Chat"). Our aim is to outline this approach and present data on intervention participation and research visit attendance after implementation.
METHODS/DESIGN: STimulant Reduction using Dosed Exercise (STRIDE) was a two-arm, multisite randomized clinical trial testing treatment-as-usual for stimulant abuse/dependence augmented by Exercise or Health Education. For both groups, study intervention visits at the site were scheduled 3/week for 12weeks followed by 1/week for 24weeks. During The Chat, research staff thoroughly reviewed participants' expectations, and barriers and solutions to retention. Fifteen participants were randomized (to Exercise or Health Education) prior to and fourteen were randomized after Chat implementation. Intervention and monthly follow-up attendance (before and after implementation) were compared at the site (N=29) that developed and rigorously implemented The Chat.
Individuals who participated in The Chat (n=14) attended significantly more intervention visits during weeks 1-12 (p<0.001) and weeks 13-36 (p<0.05) and attended more research visits (p<0.001).
Proactive discussion of expectations and barriers prior to randomization was associated with greater study attendance. SUD researchers should consider tailoring this approach to suit their needs. Further investigation is warranted.
物质使用障碍(SUD)研究中的数据缺失对内部效度构成重大威胁。参与者终止参与或减少参加干预和研究访视的可能性有多种原因,这些问题应在变得严重之前加以解决。在一项针对兴奋剂滥用的为期9个月的研究中,早期退出者以及参与者报告的参与障碍促使我们实施了一项结构化的、随机分组前的方案,与参与者讨论留存问题及以解决问题为导向的策略(“炉边谈话”)。我们的目的是概述这种方法,并展示实施后干预参与情况和研究访视出席率的数据。
方法/设计:使用定量运动减少兴奋剂使用(STRIDE)是一项双臂、多中心随机临床试验,测试针对兴奋剂滥用/依赖的常规治疗,并辅以运动或健康教育。两组在研究地点的干预访视均安排为每周3次,共12周,随后每周1次,共24周。在“炉边谈话”期间,研究人员全面审查了参与者的期望、留存的障碍及解决办法。15名参与者在“炉边谈话”实施前被随机分组(分为运动组或健康教育组),14名在实施后被随机分组。在制定并严格实施“炉边谈话”的研究地点(N = 29),对实施前后的干预和每月随访出席情况进行了比较。
参与“炉边谈话”的个体(n = 14)在第1 - 12周(p < 0.001)和第13 - 36周(p < 0.05)显著更多地参加了干预访视,且参加了更多的研究访视(p < 0.001)。
随机分组前对期望和障碍进行积极讨论与更高的研究参与率相关。SUD研究人员应考虑调整这种方法以满足自身需求。有必要进行进一步调查。