Tehrani David M, Wong Nathan D
Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Heart Disease Prevention Program, Division of Cardiology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2016 Nov;18(11):105. doi: 10.1007/s11886-016-0789-7.
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment has changed substantially in recent years. While older guidelines considered diabetes a coronary disease risk equivalent, more recent guidelines recommend risk stratification on the basis of global risk scoring to target intensity of therapy. While patients with diabetes as a whole are at greater risk for CVD events, these patients may also benefit from risk stratification based on circulating biomarkers like high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, as well as newer imaging modalities (coronary artery calcium, carotid intima-media thickness, and myocardial perfusion imaging). The addition of these CVD risk assessment modalities could play an important role for deciding how aggressive a physician should be with pharmacological therapy. Here, we discuss many of the current recommendations of CVD risk assessment in patients with diabetes including newer modalities for CVD risk assessment.
近年来,心血管疾病(CVD)风险评估发生了重大变化。过去的指南将糖尿病视为冠心病风险等同因素,而最近的指南则建议基于全球风险评分进行风险分层,以确定治疗强度。虽然总体而言糖尿病患者发生心血管疾病事件的风险更高,但这些患者也可能受益于基于循环生物标志物(如高敏C反应蛋白、高敏心肌肌钙蛋白T和N末端B型利钠肽原)以及更新的成像方式(冠状动脉钙化、颈动脉内膜中层厚度和心肌灌注成像)的风险分层。增加这些心血管疾病风险评估方式对于决定医生在药物治疗方面应采取何种积极程度可能发挥重要作用。在此,我们讨论了糖尿病患者心血管疾病风险评估的许多当前建议,包括心血管疾病风险评估的更新方式。