Hartinger Stella Maria, Lanata Claudio Franco, Hattendorf Jan, Wolf Jennyfer, Gil Ana Isabel, Obando Mariela Ortiz, Noblega Magaly, Verastegui Hector, Mäusezahl Daniel
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017 Mar;71(3):217-224. doi: 10.1136/jech-2015-206536. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
Stimulation in early childhood can alleviate adverse effects of poverty. In a community-randomised trial, we implemented 2 home-based interventions, each serving as an attention control for the other. One group received an integrated household intervention package (IHIP), whereas the other group received an early child development (ECD) intervention. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of IHIP on diarrhoea and respiratory infections, the details of which are described elsewhere. Here, we present the impact of the ECD intervention on early childhood development indicators.
In this non-blinded community-randomised trial, an ECD intervention, adapted from the Peruvian government's National Wawa Wasi ECD programme, was implemented in 25 rural Peruvian Andean communities. We enrolled 534 children aged 6-35 months, from 50 communities randomised 1:1 into ECD and IHIP communities. In ECD communities, trained fieldworkers instructed mothers every 3 weeks over the 12 months study, to stimulate and interact with their children and to use standard programme toys. IHIP communities received an improved stove and hygiene promotion. Using a nationally validated ECD evaluation instrument, all children were assessed at baseline and 12 months later for overall performance on age-specific developmental milestones which fall into 7 developmental domains.
At baseline, ECD-group and IHIP-group children performed similarly in all domains. After 12 months, data from 258 ECD-group and 251 IHIP-group children could be analysed. The proportion of children scoring above the mean in their specific age group was significantly higher in the ECD group in all domains (range: 12-23%-points higher than IHIP group). We observed the biggest difference in fine motor skills (62% vs 39% scores above the mean, OR: 2.6, 95% CI 1.7 to 3.9).
The home-based ECD intervention effectively improved child development overall across domains and separately by investigated domain. Home-based strategies could be a promising component of poverty alleviation programmes seeking to improve developmental outcomes among rural Peruvian children.
ISRCTN28191222; results.
幼儿期的刺激可减轻贫困的不利影响。在一项社区随机试验中,我们实施了两种居家干预措施,每种措施互为对照。一组接受综合家庭干预包(IHIP),而另一组接受幼儿发展(ECD)干预。该研究的主要目的是评估IHIP对腹泻和呼吸道感染的影响,其详细情况在其他地方有描述。在此,我们介绍ECD干预对幼儿发展指标的影响。
在这项非盲法社区随机试验中,在秘鲁安第斯山脉的25个农村社区实施了一项改编自秘鲁政府“国家娃娃屋幼儿发展计划”的ECD干预措施。我们招募了534名6至35个月大的儿童,来自50个社区,这些社区以1:1的比例随机分为ECD社区和IHIP社区。在ECD社区,经过培训的现场工作人员在为期12个月的研究中每3周指导母亲一次,以刺激孩子并与他们互动,并使用标准项目玩具。IHIP社区获得了改良炉灶并得到了卫生促进方面的指导。使用经过全国验证的ECD评估工具,在基线时和12个月后对所有儿童进行评估,以了解其在特定年龄发育里程碑方面的总体表现,这些里程碑分为7个发育领域。
在基线时,ECD组和IHIP组儿童在所有领域的表现相似。12个月后,对258名ECD组儿童和251名IHIP组儿童的数据进行了分析。在所有领域中,ECD组中在特定年龄组得分高于平均水平的儿童比例均显著高于IHIP组(范围:比IHIP组高12 - 23个百分点)。我们观察到精细运动技能方面的差异最大(得分高于平均水平的比例分别为62%和39%,OR:2.6,95%CI 1.7至3.9)。
居家ECD干预有效地全面改善了儿童在各个领域的发展,并且在各个单独调查的领域中也有改善。居家策略可能是旨在改善秘鲁农村儿童发育成果的扶贫计划的一个有前景的组成部分。
ISRCTN28191222;结果