Baltatzis Minas, Mason J M, Chandrabalan Vishnu, Stathakis Panagiotis, McIntyre Ben, Jegatheeswaran Santhalingam, Jamdar Saurabh, O'Reilly Derek A, Siriwardena Ajith K
Regional Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK.
Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, England, UK.
Pancreatology. 2016 Nov-Dec;16(6):946-951. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2016.08.012. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
Intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis is not recommended in acute pancreatitis. According to current international guidelines antibiotics together with further intervention should be considered in the setting of infected necrosis. Appropriate antibiotic therapy particularly avoiding over-prescription is important. This study examines antibiotic use in acute pancreatitis in a tertiary centre using the current IAP/APA guidelines for reference.
Data were collected on a consecutive series of patients admitted with acute pancreatitis over a 12 month period. Data were dichotomized by patients admitted directly to the centre and tertiary transfers. Information was collected on clinical course with specific reference to antibiotic use, episode severity, intervention and outcome.
111 consecutive episodes of acute pancreatitis constitute the reported population. 31 (28%) were tertiary transfers. Overall 65 (58.5%) patients received antibiotics. Significantly more tertiary transfer patients received antibiotics. Mean person-days of antibiotic use was 23.9 (sd 29.7) days in the overall study group but there was significantly more use in the tertiary transfer group as compared to patients having their index admission to the centre (40.9 sd 37.1 vs 10.2 sd 8.9; P < 0.005). Thirty four (44%) of patients with clinically mild acute pancreatitis received antibiotics.
There is substantial use of antibiotics in acute pancreatitis, in particular in patients with severe disease. Over-use is seen in mild acute pancreatitis. Better consideration must be given to identification of prophylaxis or therapy as indication. In relation to repeated courses of antibiotics in severe disease there must be clear indications for use.
不推荐在急性胰腺炎中进行静脉抗生素预防。根据当前国际指南,在感染性坏死的情况下应考虑使用抗生素及进一步干预措施。适当的抗生素治疗,尤其是避免过度处方,很重要。本研究以当前国际胰腺病协会(IAP)/美国胰腺协会(APA)指南为参考,调查了一家三级中心急性胰腺炎患者的抗生素使用情况。
收集了连续12个月期间收治的急性胰腺炎患者的系列数据。数据按直接入院患者和三级转诊患者进行二分。收集了临床病程信息,特别提及抗生素使用、发作严重程度、干预措施和结局。
111例连续的急性胰腺炎发作构成了报告人群。31例(28%)为三级转诊患者。总体而言,65例(58.5%)患者接受了抗生素治疗。三级转诊患者接受抗生素治疗的比例显著更高。在整个研究组中,抗生素使用的平均人天数为23.9(标准差29.7)天,但与直接在该中心首次入院的患者相比,三级转诊组的使用量显著更多(40.9标准差37.1对10.2标准差8.9;P<0.005)。34例(44%)临床轻度急性胰腺炎患者接受了抗生素治疗。
急性胰腺炎患者大量使用抗生素,尤其是重症患者。轻度急性胰腺炎存在过度使用的情况。必须更好地考虑将预防或治疗作为适应证进行识别。对于重症患者重复使用抗生素疗程,必须有明确的使用指征。