Suppr超能文献

用于治疗心脏设备感染的导线拔除术:20年单中心经验

Lead Extraction for Treatment of Cardiac Device Infection: A 20-Year Single Centre Experience.

作者信息

Gomes Sean, Cranney Gregory, Bennett Michael, Giles Robert

机构信息

Eastern Heart Clinic, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Eastern Heart Clinic, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Heart Lung Circ. 2017 Mar;26(3):240-245. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2016.06.1217. Epub 2016 Aug 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Infection is one of the most feared complications of cardiac implantable electronic devices. We report microbiology, antimicrobial therapy and infection recurrence in patients with cardiac device infection (CDI) treated with transvenous lead extraction (TLE) at a single centre over a 20-year period.

METHODS

We identified a cohort of consecutive patients undergoing TLE for CDI by a single operator at a single high volume centre. Retrospective analysis of patient characteristics, microbiology, outcomes and infection recurrence was performed.

RESULTS

Between May 1992 to March 2012, 348 patients underwent extraction due to localised or systemic infection. Seven hundred and twenty leads were extracted from these patients. The mean follow-up was 5.5+/-4.9 years. Staphylococcal species accounted for 81% of CDI. A difference is seen in infection onset for device revision compared with initial implants [median 10 months vs 24 months, P=0.0001]. Duration of antibiotics therapy depended on the nature of the CDI (21 days post TLE for systemic vs. 10 days for localised infection, P < 0.0001). There was comparable mortality in the 37 (11.2%) patients who did not have a replacement device compared with a replacement (30% vs 29%, P=0.9). Retained lead fragments are a risk factor for CDI recurrence (20.8% recurrence in retained fragments vs 4.3% in complete removal, P=0.006).

CONCLUSION

Cardiac device infection can be successfully treated with a combination of TLE and antibiotic therapy. Device therapy can be safely withdrawn in some patients. Retained lead fragments are a risk factor for recurrent CDI following extraction.

摘要

背景

感染是心脏植入式电子设备最可怕的并发症之一。我们报告了在一个中心20年期间接受经静脉导线拔除术(TLE)治疗的心脏设备感染(CDI)患者的微生物学、抗菌治疗及感染复发情况。

方法

我们确定了在一个高容量中心由一名操作者连续进行TLE治疗CDI的患者队列。对患者特征、微生物学、结局及感染复发情况进行回顾性分析。

结果

1992年5月至2012年3月期间,348例患者因局部或全身感染接受了拔除术。从这些患者身上共拔除了720根导线。平均随访时间为5.5±4.9年。葡萄球菌属占CDI的81%。与初始植入相比,设备翻修时的感染发病时间存在差异[中位数分别为10个月和24个月,P = 0.0001]。抗生素治疗的持续时间取决于CDI的性质(全身感染TLE后21天,局部感染为10天,P < 0.0001)。与植入替代设备的患者相比,37例(11.2%)未植入替代设备的患者死亡率相当(分别为30%和29%,P = 0.9)。残留导线碎片是CDI复发的危险因素(残留碎片患者复发率为20.8%,完全拔除患者为4.3%,P = 0.006)。

结论

TLE与抗生素治疗相结合可成功治疗心脏设备感染。在一些患者中可安全停用设备治疗。残留导线碎片是拔除术后CDI复发的危险因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验