• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一个基于等级的社会规范模型,用于解释人们在醉酒时如何判断自己的醉酒程度。

A rank based social norms model of how people judge their levels of drunkenness whilst intoxicated.

作者信息

Moore Simon C, Wood Alex M, Moore Laurence, Shepherd Jonathan, Murphy Simon, Brown Gordon D A

机构信息

Violence & Society Research Group, School of Dentistry, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, CF14 4XY, UK.

Behavioural Science Centre, Stirling Management School, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland, FK9 4LA, UK.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2016 Sep 13;16:798. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3469-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-016-3469-z
PMID:27619969
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5020440/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A rank based social norms model predicts that drinkers' judgements about their drinking will be based on the rank of their breath alcohol level amongst that of others in the immediate environment, rather than their actual breath alcohol level, with lower relative rank associated with greater feelings of safety. This study tested this hypothesis and examined how people judge their levels of drunkenness and the health consequences of their drinking whilst they are intoxicated in social drinking environments.

METHODS

Breath alcohol testing of 1,862 people (mean age = 26.96 years; 61.86 % male) in drinking environments. A subset (N = 400) also answered four questions asking about their perceptions of their drunkenness and the health consequences of their drinking (plus background measures).

RESULTS

Perceptions of drunkenness and the health consequences of drinking were regressed on: (a) breath alcohol level, (b) the rank of the breath alcohol level amongst that of others in the same environment, and (c) covariates. Only rank of breath alcohol level predicted perceptions: How drunk they felt (b 3.78, 95 % CI 1.69 5.87), how extreme they regarded their drinking that night (b 3.7, 95 % CI 1.3 6.20), how at risk their long-term health was due to their current level of drinking (b 4.1, 95 % CI 0.2 8.0) and how likely they felt they would experience liver cirrhosis (b 4.8. 95 % CI 0.7 8.8). People were more influenced by more sober others than by more drunk others.

CONCLUSION

Whilst intoxicated and in drinking environments, people base judgements regarding their drinking on how their level of intoxication ranks relative to that of others of the same gender around them, not on their actual levels of intoxication. Thus, when in the company of others who are intoxicated, drinkers were found to be more likely to underestimate their own level of drinking, drunkenness and associated risks. The implications of these results, for example that increasing the numbers of sober people in night time environments could improve subjective assessments of drunkenness, are discussed.

摘要

背景

基于排名的社会规范模型预测,饮酒者对自身饮酒情况的判断将基于其呼气酒精含量在周围环境其他人中的排名,而非实际呼气酒精含量,相对排名越低,安全感越高。本研究对这一假设进行了检验,并考察了人们在社交饮酒环境中醉酒时如何判断自己的醉酒程度以及饮酒对健康的影响。

方法

在饮酒环境中对1862人(平均年龄 = 26.96岁;61.86%为男性)进行呼气酒精测试。其中一部分人(N = 400)还回答了四个关于他们对醉酒程度及饮酒对健康影响的看法的问题(以及背景测量问题)。

结果

对醉酒程度及饮酒对健康影响的看法与以下因素进行回归分析:(a)呼气酒精含量,(b)呼气酒精含量在同一环境其他人中的排名,以及(c)协变量。只有呼气酒精含量排名能预测这些看法:他们感觉有多醉(b = 3.78,95%置信区间1.69至5.87),他们认为当晚饮酒有多过度(b = 3.7,95%置信区间1.3至6.20),他们认为由于当前饮酒水平长期健康面临的风险有多大(b = 4.1,95%置信区间0.2至8.0)以及他们感觉自己患肝硬化的可能性有多大(b = 4.8,95%置信区间0.7至8.8)。人们受比自己清醒的人的影响大于受比自己醉的人的影响。

结论

在醉酒且处于饮酒环境中时,人们对自己饮酒情况的判断基于其醉酒程度相对于周围同性其他人的排名,而非实际醉酒程度。因此,当与其他醉酒的人在一起时,饮酒者更有可能低估自己的饮酒量、醉酒程度及相关风险。文中讨论了这些结果的意义,例如增加夜间环境中清醒者的数量可能会改善对醉酒程度的主观评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/631f/5020440/f994efaa4d2a/12889_2016_3469_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/631f/5020440/f994efaa4d2a/12889_2016_3469_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/631f/5020440/f994efaa4d2a/12889_2016_3469_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A rank based social norms model of how people judge their levels of drunkenness whilst intoxicated.一个基于等级的社会规范模型,用于解释人们在醉酒时如何判断自己的醉酒程度。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Sep 13;16:798. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3469-z.
2
Cross-sectional measures and modelled estimates of blood alcohol levels in UK nightlife and their relationships with drinking behaviours and observed signs of inebriation.英国夜生活中血液酒精水平的横断面测量和模型估计及其与饮酒行为和观察到的醉酒迹象的关系。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2010 Apr 20;5:5. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-5-5.
3
Ideal, expected and perceived descriptive norm drunkenness in UK nightlife environments: a cross-sectional study.英国夜生活环境中理想、预期和感知的描述性醉酒规范:一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Apr 27;19(1):442. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6802-5.
4
Subjective perceptions associated with the ascending and descending slopes of breath alcohol exposure vary with recent drinking history.与呼气酒精暴露的上升和下降坡度相关的主观感知因近期饮酒史而异。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2012 Jun;36(6):1050-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01642.x. Epub 2011 Sep 20.
5
Perceived danger while intoxicated uniquely contributes to driving after drinking.醉酒时感知到的危险是酒后驾车的独特成因。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2014 Feb;38(2):521-8. doi: 10.1111/acer.12252. Epub 2013 Sep 13.
6
'You're repulsive': Limits to acceptable drunken comportment for young adults.“你真恶心”:年轻人可接受的醉酒行为的界限。
Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Mar;53:106-112. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.10.005. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
7
Drunk personality: reports from drinkers and knowledgeable informants.醉酒性格:饮酒者及知情者的报告
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2014 Jun;22(3):187-97. doi: 10.1037/a0036607. Epub 2014 May 5.
8
Examining the sociocultural sensitivity of subjective drunkenness: Comparing Arab and Jewish Israeli pub patrons.考察主观醉酒的社会文化敏感性:比较阿拉伯和犹太以色列酒吧顾客。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2017 Nov;36(6):813-819. doi: 10.1111/dar.12511. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
9
Factors Associated with Self-Estimated Breath Alcohol Concentration Among Bar Patrons.酒吧顾客自我估计的呼气酒精浓度相关因素
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2017 Aug;41(8):1492-1501. doi: 10.1111/acer.13428. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
10
Breath Alcohol Concentration and Perception of Drunkenness: A Comparison between Adolescents and Young Adults Drinking Alcohol in Public Settings.呼气酒精浓度与醉酒感知:在公共场合饮酒的青少年和年轻成年人之间的比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 22;17(8):2890. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082890.

引用本文的文献

1
Are you feeling what I'm feeling? Momentary interactions between personal and perceived peer subjective response predict craving and continued drinking in young adults.你能感受到我所感受到的吗?个人与感知到的同伴主观反应之间的瞬间互动预示着年轻人的渴望和持续饮酒行为。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2025 May 1;270:112601. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2025.112601. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
2
Taking pleasure seriously: Should alcohol research say more about fun?认真对待愉悦感:酒精研究是否应该更多地探讨乐趣?
Addiction. 2025 Jun;120(6):1075-1081. doi: 10.1111/add.16747. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
3
An Exploration of the Multiplicative Effect of "Other People" and Other Environmental Effects on Violence in the Night-Time Environment.

本文引用的文献

1
Contextual effects on the perceived health benefits of exercise: the exercise rank hypothesis.锻炼感知健康益处的情境效应:锻炼等级假说。
J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2012 Dec;34(6):828-41. doi: 10.1123/jsep.34.6.828.
2
How are personality judgments made? A cognitive model of reference group effects, personality scale responses, and behavioral reactions.人格判断是如何做出的?参照群体效应、人格量表反应和行为反应的认知模型。
J Pers. 2012 Oct;80(5):1275-311. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00763.x.
3
Social norm influences on evaluations of the risks associated with alcohol consumption: applying the rank-based decision by sampling model to health judgments.
探究“他人”等环境因素对夜间环境中暴力行为的相乘效应。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 16;19(24):16963. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416963.
4
Combining refutations and social norms increases belief change.结合反驳和社会规范能增加信念改变。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Jun;76(6):1275-1297. doi: 10.1177/17470218221111750. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
5
Breath Alcohol Concentration and Perception of Drunkenness: A Comparison between Adolescents and Young Adults Drinking Alcohol in Public Settings.呼气酒精浓度与醉酒感知:在公共场合饮酒的青少年和年轻成年人之间的比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 22;17(8):2890. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082890.
社会规范对饮酒相关风险评估的影响:将基于排序的决策抽样模型应用于健康判断。
Alcohol Alcohol. 2012 Jan-Feb;47(1):57-62. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agr146. Epub 2011 Nov 17.
4
An evolutionary based social rank explanation of why low income predicts mental distress: a 17 year cohort study of 30,000 people.基于进化的社会等级解释为什么低收入预示着精神困扰:对 30000 人的 17 年队列研究。
J Affect Disord. 2012 Feb;136(3):882-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.09.014. Epub 2011 Nov 9.
5
Prospective predictors of suicidality: defeat and entrapment lead to changes in suicidal ideation over time.前瞻性自杀预测因素:失败和困境导致自杀意念随时间发生变化。
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2011 Jun;41(3):297-306. doi: 10.1111/j.1943-278X.2011.00029.x. Epub 2011 Apr 4.
6
The role of defeat and entrapment in depression, anxiety, and suicide.挫败感和困境在抑郁、焦虑和自杀中的作用。
Psychol Bull. 2011 May;137(3):391-420. doi: 10.1037/a0022935.
7
Thanks, but I'm used to better: a relative rank model of gratitude.谢谢,但我已经习惯了更好的:感激的相对等级模型。
Emotion. 2011 Feb;11(1):175-80. doi: 10.1037/a0021553.
8
Interventions for disorder and severe intoxication in and around licensed premises, 1989-2009.1989-2009 年持牌场所内及周围的紊乱和严重中毒干预措施。
Addiction. 2011 Apr;106(4):706-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03297.x. Epub 2011 Feb 14.
9
The reduction of intoxication and disorder in premises licensed to serve alcohol: an exploratory randomised controlled trial.减少许可售酒场所的醉酒和混乱:一项探索性随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2010 Oct 14;10:607. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-607.
10
Appraisals and suicidality: the mediating role of defeat and entrapment.评价与自杀意念:挫败感和束缚感的中介作用。
Arch Suicide Res. 2010;14(3):236-47. doi: 10.1080/13811118.2010.494138.