• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

西班牙吸烟立法对家庭实施无烟规定的影响:西班牙巴塞罗那的一项纵向研究

Impact of the Spanish smoking legislations in the adoption of smoke-free rules at home: a longitudinal study in Barcelona (Spain).

作者信息

Lidón-Moyano Cristina, Martínez-Sánchez Jose M, Fu Marcela, Ballbè Montse, Martín-Sánchez Juan Carlos, Martínez Cristina, Saltó Esteve, Fernández Esteve

机构信息

Biostatistics Unit, Department of Basic Sciences, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Sant Cugat del Vallès, Spain.

Tobacco Control Unit, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Institut Català d'Oncologia, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Tob Control. 2016 Sep;26(5):557-562. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053114. Epub 2016 Sep 13.

DOI:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053114
PMID:27625409
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of two Spanish smoking legislations in the adoption of voluntary smoke-free-homes rules in Spain.

METHODS

This is a longitudinal study, before and after the implementation of two national smoking bans (in 2005 and 2010), in a representative sample (n=1245) of non-institutionalised adults (≥16 years) from Barcelona (Spain) surveyed in 2004-2005 and followed up in 2013-2014. The final sample analysed was 736 individuals (400 women and 336 men). We defined smoking rules in the houses as complete (when smoking was not allowed in the household), partial (when smoking was allowed in some places inside the house) or absent (when smoking was allowed everywhere). We calculated relative changes in the prevalence of smoking rules in homes before and after 2 national smoking legislations by means of prevalence ratios (PRs) and their 95% CIs.

RESULTS

The households with voluntary smoke-free rules (complete or partial) relatively increased 31% after Spanish smoking bans (from 55.6% to 72.6%, p<0.001). The houses with complete rules relatively increased 57% (from 23.9% to 37.6%, p<0.001) whereas the houses with partial rules increased 11% (from 31.7% to 35.0%, p=0.148). The increase of any type of rules (complete and partial) was statistically significantly independent of sex (PR between 1.29 and 1.33), age (PR between 1.24 and 1.33), educational level (PR between 1.19 and 1.47) and minimum age in house (PR between 1.12 and 1.40). However, this increase was statistically and significantly higher only among never smokers (PR=1.46) at baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of the smoke-free regulations in public and work places in Spain was associated with an increasing of voluntary adoption of smoke-free rules in homes. According to our data, the Spanish smoking bans did not shift the tobacco consumption from public and work places to private places (homes).

摘要

目的

评估西班牙两项吸烟相关立法对该国采用家庭自愿无烟规则的影响。

方法

这是一项纵向研究,在两项全国性吸烟禁令实施前后(2005年和2010年),对来自西班牙巴塞罗那的非机构化成年人(≥16岁)的代表性样本(n = 1245)进行调查,该样本于2004 - 2005年进行首次调查,并于2013 - 2014年进行随访。最终分析的样本为736人(400名女性和336名男性)。我们将家庭中的吸烟规则定义为完全无烟(家中任何地方都不允许吸烟)、部分无烟(家中某些地方允许吸烟)或无限制(家中各处都允许吸烟)。我们通过患病率比(PRs)及其95%置信区间计算了两项全国性吸烟立法前后家庭吸烟规则患病率的相对变化。

结果

西班牙实施吸烟禁令后,实行自愿无烟规则(完全或部分)的家庭相对增加了31%(从55.6%增至72.6%,p < 0.001)。完全无烟规则的家庭相对增加了57%(从23.9%增至37.6%,p < 0.001),而部分无烟规则的家庭增加了11%(从3I.7%增至35.0%,p = 0.148)。任何类型规则(完全和部分)的增加在统计学上均与性别(PR在1.29至1.33之间)、年龄(PR在1.24至1.33之间)、教育水平(PR在1.19至1.47之间)以及家中最小年龄(PR在1.12至1.40之间)无关。然而,这种增加仅在基线时从不吸烟者中在统计学上显著更高(PR = 1.46)。

结论

西班牙在公共场所和工作场所实施无烟规定与家庭中自愿采用无烟规则的增加有关。根据我们的数据,西班牙的吸烟禁令并未使烟草消费从公共场所和工作场所转移到私人场所(家庭)。

相似文献

1
Impact of the Spanish smoking legislations in the adoption of smoke-free rules at home: a longitudinal study in Barcelona (Spain).西班牙吸烟立法对家庭实施无烟规定的影响:西班牙巴塞罗那的一项纵向研究
Tob Control. 2016 Sep;26(5):557-562. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053114. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
2
Secondhand smoke risk perception and smoke-free rules in homes: a cross-sectional study in Barcelona (Spain).家庭中的二手烟风险认知与无烟规定:西班牙巴塞罗那的一项横断面研究
BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 19;7(1):e014207. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014207.
3
Smoke-free homes and attitudes towards banning smoking in vehicles carrying children in Spain (2016).西班牙的无烟家庭和对在载有儿童的车辆中禁烟的态度(2016 年)。
Environ Res. 2017 Oct;158:590-597. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.07.012. Epub 2017 Jul 15.
4
Impact of the Spanish smoking laws on tobacco consumption and secondhand smoke exposure: A longitudinal population study.西班牙吸烟法对烟草消费和二手烟暴露的影响:一项纵向人群研究。
Addict Behav. 2017 Dec;75:30-35. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.06.016. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
5
Attitudes of Korean smokers towards smoke-free public places: findings from the longitudinal ITC Korea Survey, 2005-2010.韩国烟民对无烟公共场所的态度:来自 2005-2010 年 ITC 韩国纵向调查的结果。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 10;9(8):e025298. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025298.
6
Exposure to secondhand smoke and voluntary adoption of smoke-free home and car rules among non-smoking South African adults.南非非吸烟成年人接触二手烟情况及无烟家庭和汽车规则的自愿采用情况。
BMC Public Health. 2014 Jun 10;14:580. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-580.
7
Do smoke-free policies in work and public places increase smoking in private venues?工作场所和公共场所的禁烟政策是否会增加私人场所的吸烟量?
Tob Control. 2014 May;23(3):204-7. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050877. Epub 2013 Apr 25.
8
Assessment of salivary cotinine concentration among general non-smokers population: Before and after Spanish smoking legislations.普通非吸烟人群唾液可替宁浓度评估:西班牙吸烟立法前后
Cancer Epidemiol. 2017 Dec;51:87-91. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2017.10.011. Epub 2017 Nov 5.
9
Smoke-free home and vehicle rules by tobacco use status among US adults.美国成年人中按烟草使用状况划分的无烟家庭和车辆规则
Prev Med. 2015 Sep;78:9-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.06.004. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
10
Impact of National Smoke-Free Legislation on Educational Disparities in Smoke-Free Homes: Findings from the SIDRIAT Longitudinal Study.国家无烟立法对无烟家庭中教育差距的影响:来自SIDRIAT纵向研究的结果
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Jul 24;12(8):8705-16. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120808705.

引用本文的文献

1
Tobacco usage in the home: a cross-sectional analysis of heated tobacco product (HTP) use and combustible tobacco smoking in Japan, 2023.家庭中的烟草使用:2023 年日本对加热烟草产品(HTP)使用和可燃烟草吸烟的横断面分析。
Environ Health Prev Med. 2024;29:11. doi: 10.1265/ehpm.23-00292.
2
Variation in Nicotine Metabolization According to Biological Factors and Type of Nicotine Consumer.根据生物因素和尼古丁消费者类型的尼古丁代谢差异。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jan 6;11(2):179. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11020179.
3
Impact of population tobacco control interventions on socioeconomic inequalities in smoking: a systematic review and appraisal of future research directions.
人群烟草控制干预措施对吸烟方面社会经济不平等的影响:一项系统综述及对未来研究方向的评估
Tob Control. 2020 Sep 29;30(e2):e87-95. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-055874.
4
[Support to smoking regulation in private vehicles and public outdoor spaces].[对私人车辆和公共户外空间吸烟规定的支持]
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2019 Jul 24;93:e201907056.
5
[Prevalence of smoke-free homes and passive exposure to tobacco in pediatric population (children from 3 to 36 months)].[无烟家庭的患病率及儿科人群(3至36个月儿童)的被动烟草暴露情况]
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2019 Jul 16;93:e201907045.