Hong Sung Noh, Jang Hyun Joo, Ye Byong Duk, Jeon Seong Ran, Im Jong Pil, Cha Jae Myung, Kim Seong-Eun, Park Soo Jung, Kim Eun Ran, Chang Dong Kyung
Department of Internal Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Hwaseong, Republic of Korea.
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 14;11(9):e0162615. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162615. eCollection 2016.
Various modalities have been used to diagnose Meckel's diverticulum (MD) in practice, but with their diagnostic accuracy deemed to be unsatisfactory for clinical practice. Moreover, the usefulness of these modalities has not been evaluated for the diagnosis of bleeding MD in adults, due to the relative rarity of this condition. Therefore, the aim of our multicenter study was to determine the most accurate modality for the preoperative diagnosis of bleeding MD in adults.
We conducted a retrospective analysis of the diagnostic accuracy for small bowel bleeding associated with MD of different modalities in patients ≥18 years old who underwent assessment for MD, with confirmation at the time of explorative surgery. Diagnostic accuracy of the different modalities was evaluated against the diagnosis obtained using technetium-99m pertechnetate scintigraphy (also known as Meckel's scan), considered to be the gold standard for the diagnosis of bleeding MD in pediatrics.
Thirty-five adults were identified with bleeding in MD over the study period, between 2005 and 2012. Among these patients, only 24 (68.6%) were diagnosed with MD preoperatively. The mean (95% confidence interval) diagnostic accuracy of selected modalities was as follows: Meckel's scan, 21.4% (5.7%-51.2%); capsule endoscopy, 35.7% (14.0%-64.4%); balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE), 85.0% (61.1%-96.0%); angiography, 0.0% (0.0%-80.2%); computed tomography, 31.8% (14.7%-54.9%); and small-bowel follow-through, 62.5% (25.9%-90.0%). The diagnostic accuracy was significantly higher for BAE than for Meckel's scan (P = 0.001).
Among available diagnostic modalities, BAE provides the highest accuracy for the diagnosis of bleeding MD in adults and, therefore, should be considered as the preferred modality for preoperative diagnosis.
在实际应用中,已采用多种方法诊断梅克尔憩室(MD),但其诊断准确性在临床实践中被认为不尽人意。此外,由于成人出血性MD相对罕见,这些方法在诊断成人出血性MD方面的实用性尚未得到评估。因此,我们多中心研究的目的是确定术前诊断成人出血性MD的最准确方法。
我们对年龄≥18岁、接受MD评估且在探查手术时确诊的患者中,不同方法对与MD相关的小肠出血的诊断准确性进行了回顾性分析。以锝-99m高锝酸盐闪烁扫描(也称为梅克尔扫描)作为儿科出血性MD诊断的金标准,评估不同方法的诊断准确性。
在2005年至2012年的研究期间,共确定35例成人MD出血患者。在这些患者中,仅24例(68.6%)术前被诊断为MD。所选方法的平均(95%置信区间)诊断准确性如下:梅克尔扫描,21.4%(5.7%-51.2%);胶囊内镜检查,35.7%(14.0%-64.4%);气囊辅助小肠镜检查(BAE),85.0%(61.1%-96.0%);血管造影,0.0%(0.0%-80.2%);计算机断层扫描,31.8%(14.7%-54.9%);小肠钡剂造影,62.5%(25.9%-90.0%)。BAE的诊断准确性显著高于梅克尔扫描(P = 0.001)。
在现有的诊断方法中,BAE对成人出血性MD的诊断准确性最高,因此应被视为术前诊断的首选方法。