University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2016 Sep 29;4(3):422-34. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00069. Print 2016 Sep 28.
Recurrent illness following hospital discharge is a major contributor to childhood mortality in resource-poor countries. Yet post-discharge care is largely ignored by health care workers and policy makers due to a lack of resources to identify children with recurrent illness and a lack of cohesive systems to provide care. The purpose of this proof-of-concept study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a bundle of interventions at discharge to improve health outcomes during the vulnerable post-discharge period.
The study was conducted between December 2014 and April 2015. Eligible children were between ages 6 months and 5 years who were admitted with a suspected or proven infectious disease to one of two hospitals in Mbarara, Uganda. A bundle of interventions was provided at the time of discharge. This bundle included post-discharge referrals for follow-up visits and a discharge kit. The post-discharge referral was to ensure follow-up with a nearby health care provider on days 2, 7, and 14 following discharge. The discharge kit included brief educational counseling along with simple preventive items as incentives (soap, a mosquito net, and oral rehydration salts) to reinforce the education. The primary study outcome was the number of post-discharge referral visits completed. Secondary study outcomes included satisfaction with the intervention, rates of readmission after 60 days, and post-discharge mortality rates. In addition, outcomes were compared with a historical control group, enrolled using the same inclusion criteria and outcome-ascertainment methods.
During the study, 216 children were admitted, of whom 14 died during hospitalization. Of the 202 children discharged, 85% completed at least 1 of the 3 follow-up referral visits, with 48% completing all 3 visits. Within 60 days after discharge, 22 children were readmitted at least once and 5 children (2.5%) died. Twelve (43%) readmissions occurred during a scheduled follow-up visit. Compared with prospectively enrolled historical controls, the post-discharge referral for follow-up increased the odds of readmission (odds ratio [OR], 1.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14 to 3.23) and care sought after discharge (OR, 14.61; 95% CI, 9.41 to 22.67). Overall satisfaction with the bundle of interventions was high, with most caregivers strongly agreeing that the discharge kit and post-discharge referrals improved their ability to care for their child.
Interventions initiated at the time of discharge have the potential to profoundly affect the landscape of care during illness recovery and lead to significantly improved outcomes among children under 5 years of age.
在资源匮乏的国家,出院后疾病复发是导致儿童死亡的主要原因之一。然而,由于缺乏识别疾病复发儿童的资源以及提供护理的协调系统,出院后护理在很大程度上被医护人员和政策制定者忽视。本概念验证研究旨在评估在出院时实施一整套干预措施,以改善出院后脆弱期的健康结果。
该研究于 2014 年 12 月至 2015 年 4 月进行。合格的儿童年龄在 6 个月至 5 岁之间,因疑似或确诊传染病而入住乌干达姆巴拉拉的两家医院之一。在出院时提供了一套干预措施。该干预措施包括出院后随访就诊的转介和出院工具包。出院后转介的目的是确保在出院后第 2、7 和 14 天与附近的医疗服务提供者进行随访。出院工具包包括简要的教育咨询以及简单的预防用品作为激励措施(肥皂、蚊帐和口服补液盐),以加强教育。主要研究结果是完成出院后转介就诊的次数。次要研究结果包括对干预措施的满意度、60 天后的再入院率和出院后死亡率。此外,还将研究结果与使用相同纳入标准和结果确定方法的历史对照组进行了比较。
在研究期间,有 216 名儿童入院,其中 14 名在住院期间死亡。在 202 名出院的儿童中,85%至少完成了 3 次随访就诊中的 1 次,其中 48%完成了所有 3 次就诊。出院后 60 天内,有 22 名儿童至少再次入院一次,有 5 名儿童(2.5%)死亡。12 次(43%)再入院发生在计划的随访就诊期间。与前瞻性纳入的历史对照组相比,出院后的随访就诊增加了再入院的可能性(比值比[OR],1.92;95%置信区间[CI],1.14 至 3.23)和出院后寻求护理的可能性(OR,14.61;95%CI,9.41 至 22.67)。对干预措施的整体满意度很高,大多数照顾者强烈认为出院工具包和出院转介提高了他们照顾孩子的能力。
在出院时开始的干预措施有可能深刻影响疾病康复期间的护理格局,并显著改善 5 岁以下儿童的结局。