Kolasa Katarzyna, Kowalczyk Marta
Health Economics Department, Collegium Medicum Bydgoszcz, Sandomierska 16, 85-630, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Pharmacoeconomics Department, Medical University of Warsaw, Żwirki i Wigury 81, 02-091, Warsaw, Poland.
BMC Public Health. 2016 Sep 15;16:992. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3624-6.
There are positive and negative consequences of the implementation of out of pocket (OOP) payments as a source of the healthcare financing. On the one hand, OOP burden increases awareness of treatment costs and limits unnecessary use of healthcare services. On the other hand, it may prevent the sick from accessing needed care. Consequently there are several aspects that ought to be taken into consideration while defining the optimal structure of OOP payments. The objective of this study was twofold. Firstly, it was to understand what actions are taken to decrease the OOP burden. Secondly, it was to address the question whether the implementation of any form of formal OOP payments may impact negatively upon fairness in financial contribution.
The literature search was conducted using the Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Center of Review and Dissemination databases. Only studies which measured the Kakwani index of progressivity in at least two time points were included. Articles written in English published between January 2004 and September 2015 were searched. No geographical restriction was imposed. An increment of more than 0.10 in the Kakwani index was considered as a significant health policy impact.
In total 16 publications were included, of which nine studied attempts to decrease the OOP burden, four described the consequences of the introduction of formal fees, and three covered both topics. Overall, a significant health policy impact was noted in four cases. All of them related to a reduction in the OOP burden, with three and one noting a change towards the progressivity and regressivity of direct healthcare payments respectively. Among jurisdictions which introduced formal fees, none study noted a significant impact on the regressivity of OOP spendings.
In the majority of cases, a health policy impact on the distribution of OOP health payments was insignificant. The reduction of OOP burden cannot be achieved successfully without adequate extension of healthcare coverage or engagement of other sources of healthcare financing. When formal fees are being introduced, protection against catastrophic healthcare payments is needed for the most vulnerable groups.
实施自费支付作为医疗保健融资来源有积极和消极的后果。一方面,自费负担会提高对治疗成本的认识,并限制对医疗服务的不必要使用。另一方面,它可能会阻止患者获得所需的护理。因此,在确定自费支付的最佳结构时,有几个方面需要考虑。本研究的目的有两个。首先,是了解采取了哪些行动来减轻自费负担。其次,是解决是否实施任何形式的正式自费支付可能对财务贡献的公平性产生负面影响的问题。
使用PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆以及综述与传播中心数据库进行文献检索。仅纳入至少在两个时间点测量累进性Kakwani指数的研究。检索了2004年1月至2015年9月期间发表的英文文章。没有施加地理限制。Kakwani指数增加超过0.10被认为是重大的卫生政策影响。
总共纳入了16篇出版物,其中9篇研究了减轻自费负担的尝试,4篇描述了引入正式费用的后果,3篇涵盖了这两个主题。总体而言,在4个案例中发现了重大的卫生政策影响。所有这些都与自费负担的减轻有关,其中3个和1个分别指出直接医疗支付的累进性和累退性发生了变化。在引入正式费用的司法管辖区中,没有研究指出对自费支出的累退性有重大影响。
在大多数情况下,卫生政策对自费医疗支付分配的影响微不足道。如果没有充分扩大医疗保健覆盖范围或参与其他医疗保健融资来源,就无法成功减轻自费负担。在引入正式费用时,最弱势群体需要防范灾难性医疗支付。