Institute for Alpine Environment, EURAC Research, Viale Druso 1, 39100 Bolzano, Italy; Institute of Ecology, University of Innsbruck, Sternwartestr. 15, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Environmental Management Center, Mykolas Romeris University (EMC-MRU), Ateities g. 20, LT-08303 Vilnius, Lithuania.
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Jan 1;574:422-436. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.209. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
Accounting for the spatial connectivity between the provision of ecosystem services (ES) and their beneficiaries (supply-benefit chain) is fundamental to understanding ecosystem functioning and its management. However, the interrelationships of the specific chain links within ecosystems and the actual benefits that flow from natural landscapes to surrounding land have rarely been analyzed. We present a spatially explicit model for the analysis of one cultural ecosystem service (aesthetic experience), which integrates the complete ecosystem service delivery chain for Puez-Geisler Nature Park (Italy): (1) The potential service stock (ES capacity) relies on an expert-based land use ranking matrix, (2) the actual supply (ES flow) is based on visibility properties of observation points along recreational routes, (3) the beneficiaries of the service (ES demand) are derived from socioeconomic data as a measure of the visitation rate to the recreation location, and (4) the supply-demand relationship (ES budget) addresses the spatially explicit oversupply and undersupply of ES. The results indicate that potential ES stocks are substantially higher in core and buffer zones of protected areas than in surrounding land owing to the specific landscape composition. ES flow maps reveal service delivery to 80% of the total area studied, with the highest actual service supply to locations with long and open vistas. ES beneficiary analyses show the highest demand for aesthetic experiences in all-season tourist destinations like Val Badia and Val Gardena, where both recreational amenity and overnight stays are equally high. ES budget maps identify ES hot and cold spots in terms of ES delivery, and they highlight ES undersupply in nature protection buffer zones although they are characterized by highest ES capacity. We show how decision/policy makers can use the presented methodology to plan landscape protection measures and develop specific regulation strategies for visitors based on the ES delivery chain concept.
核算生态系统服务(ES)的供给与受益者(供给-效益链)之间的空间关联,是理解生态系统功能及其管理的基础。然而,生态系统内特定链环的相互关系以及自然景观向周围土地实际流动的效益,很少得到分析。我们提出了一个空间明确的模型,用于分析普埃兹-盖斯勒自然公园(意大利)的一种文化生态系统服务(审美体验):(1)潜在服务存量(ES 能力)依赖于基于专家的土地利用等级矩阵,(2)实际供给(ES 流)基于观察点沿休闲路线的可见性属性,(3)服务的受益者(ES 需求)由社会经济数据得出,作为对休闲地点访问率的度量,(4)供求关系(ES 预算)涉及 ES 的空间明确供应过剩和供应不足。结果表明,由于特定的景观组成,保护区核心区和缓冲区的潜在 ES 存量大大高于周围土地。ES 流图显示,80%的研究总面积都有服务提供,而具有长而开阔视野的地点的实际服务供给最高。ES 受益分析显示,在瓦尔巴迪亚和瓦尔加迪纳等四季皆宜的旅游目的地,对审美体验的需求最高,这些地方的休闲设施和过夜住宿同样高。ES 预算图根据 ES 交付情况确定 ES 的热点和冷点,并突出显示了自然保护缓冲区的 ES 供应不足,尽管这些缓冲区的 ES 能力最高。我们展示了决策者如何利用所提出的方法学来规划景观保护措施,并根据 ES 交付链概念为游客制定具体的管理策略。