Schneider Udo, Linder Roland, Verheyen Frank
WINEG, Scientific Institute of TK for Benefit and Efficiency in Health Care, Bramfelder Straße 140, 22305 Hamburg, Germany.
WINEG, Scientific Institute of TK for Benefit and Efficiency in Health Care, Bramfelder Straße 140, 22305 Hamburg, Germany.
Health Policy. 2016 Oct;120(10):1193-1201. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.09.001. Epub 2016 Sep 8.
The implementation of a graded return-to-work (RTW) program to reintegrate those in long-term sickness started in Germany in 1971. Based on a return plan by the physician and insured, participants increase their working hours slowly over a specified period of time. Using data on sick leaves from claims data of the Techniker Krankenkasse, we consider sick-leave spells starting from October 2010 to January 2011 with a successful return to work within 517 days. We applied a propensity score matching between participants and non-participants to further analyze differences in sickness spells, medical demand and treatment costs in a follow-up period of 540 days and hence estimate the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) for the RTW participation with respect to sickness time, sickness benefits and medical expenditures. We found significant but rather small differences in medical costs between treatment and control group. In detail, RTW participants showed slightly lower expenditures on hospitals but higher for ambulatory services and pharmaceuticals. Moreover, differences in expenditure were related to the condition of the initial sickness spell. Reasons behind this findings may be a different perception of the own health care status and a higher need for medical services. Overall, our findings differ between diagnosis groups of the initial sickness period.
1971年,德国开始实施分级返岗(RTW)计划,以使长期患病者重新融入工作。根据医生和参保人的返岗计划,参与者在特定时间段内逐步增加工作时长。利用技术人员健康保险基金理赔数据中的病假数据,我们考察了2010年10月至2011年1月开始的病假,且在517天内成功返岗的情况。我们在参与者和非参与者之间进行倾向得分匹配,以进一步分析在540天的随访期内病假时长、医疗需求和治疗成本的差异,从而估计RTW参与对治疗组(ATT)在病假时间、病假津贴和医疗支出方面的平均治疗效果。我们发现治疗组和对照组在医疗成本上存在显著但较小的差异。具体而言,RTW参与者在医院支出上略低,但门诊服务和药品支出较高。此外,支出差异与初始病假的病情有关。这一发现背后的原因可能是对自身医疗状况的不同认知以及对医疗服务的更高需求。总体而言,我们的发现在初始病假诊断组之间存在差异。