• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从医疗群体和康复患者的角度看德国职业医师、康复医师和全科医生之间合作的经验、态度及改进可能性——一项定性研究方案

Experiences, attitudes and possibilities for improvement concerning the cooperation between occupational physicians, rehabilitation physicians and general practitioners in Germany from the perspectives of the medical groups and rehabilitation patients - a protocol for a qualitative study.

作者信息

Voelter-Mahlknecht Susanne, Stratil Jan M, Kaluscha Rainer, Krischak Gert, Rieger Monika A

机构信息

Institute for Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Health Services Research (Institut fuer Arbeitsmedizin, Sozialmedizin und Versorgungsforschung), University Hospital Tuebingen, Germany.

Institute of Research in Rehabilitation Medicine at Ulm University (Institut fuer rehabilitationsmedizinische Forschung an der Universitaet Ulm), Bad Buchau, Germany.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2017 Apr 26;7(4):e014228. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014228.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014228
PMID:28446524
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5775471/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Rehabilitation measures for patients in the working age primarily aim at maintaining employability, restoring fitness for work or timely return to work (RTW). To facilitate RTW after long sick leave in Germany, both rehabilitation physicians' knowledge about the patients' workplace and communication between the rehabilitation physician and the occupational physician need to be improved. This research will record the experiences and attitudes of occupational physicians, rehabilitation physicians and general practitioners, as well as of rehabilitation patients, to indicate barriers and possibilities for improvement concerning the intersection between workplace and rehabilitation institution. As a previous literature review has shown, insufficient data on the experiences and attitudes of the stakeholders are available. Therefore, an exploratory qualitative approach was chosen.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

8 focus group discussions will be conducted with occupational physicians, rehabilitation physicians, general practitioners and rehabilitation patients (2 focus groups with 6-8 interviewees per category). Qualitative content analysis will be used to evaluate the data, thus describing positive and negative experiences and attitudes, barriers and possibilities for improvement at the intersection of general and occupational medicine and rehabilitation with regard to the workplace. The data from the focus groups will be used to develop a standardised quantitative questionnaire for a survey of the medical groups and rehabilitation patients in a follow-up project.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The research will be undertaken with the approval of the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty and University Hospital of Tuebingen. The study participants' consent will be documented in written form. The names of all study participants and all other confidential information data fall under medical confidentiality. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed medical journal independent of the nature of the results.

摘要

引言

针对工作年龄患者的康复措施主要旨在维持其就业能力、恢复工作适应性或及时重返工作岗位(RTW)。为促进德国长期病假后的RTW,康复医师对患者工作场所的了解以及康复医师与职业医师之间的沟通都需要改进。本研究将记录职业医师、康复医师、全科医生以及康复患者的经验和态度,以指出工作场所与康复机构交叉领域存在的障碍及改进的可能性。正如之前的文献综述所示,关于利益相关者经验和态度的数据不足。因此,选择了探索性定性研究方法。

方法与分析

将与职业医师、康复医师、全科医生和康复患者进行8次焦点小组讨论(每个类别2个焦点小组,每组6 - 8名受访者)。将采用定性内容分析法评估数据,从而描述在普通医学、职业医学与康复交叉领域中,关于工作场所的积极和消极经验、态度、障碍及改进可能性。焦点小组的数据将用于制定标准化定量问卷,以便在后续项目中对医疗群体和康复患者进行调查。

伦理与传播

本研究将在图宾根大学医学院和大学医院伦理委员会批准下进行。将以书面形式记录研究参与者的同意书。所有研究参与者的姓名及所有其他机密信息数据均受医疗保密规定保护。无论结果如何,研究结果都将发表在同行评审的医学期刊上。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5730/5775471/fa079916b7f5/bmjopen-2016-014228f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5730/5775471/fa079916b7f5/bmjopen-2016-014228f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5730/5775471/fa079916b7f5/bmjopen-2016-014228f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Experiences, attitudes and possibilities for improvement concerning the cooperation between occupational physicians, rehabilitation physicians and general practitioners in Germany from the perspectives of the medical groups and rehabilitation patients - a protocol for a qualitative study.从医疗群体和康复患者的角度看德国职业医师、康复医师和全科医生之间合作的经验、态度及改进可能性——一项定性研究方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Apr 26;7(4):e014228. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014228.
2
How do occupational rehabilitation clinicians approach participants on long-term sick leave in order to facilitate return to work? A focus group study.职业康复临床医生如何与长期病假的参与者沟通,以促进他们重返工作岗位?一项焦点小组研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Nov 17;17(1):744. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2709-y.
3
Optimizing cooperation between general practitioners, occupational health and rehabilitation physicians in Germany: a qualitative study.优化德国全科医生、职业健康和康复医生之间的合作:一项定性研究。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2017 Nov;90(8):809-821. doi: 10.1007/s00420-017-1239-6. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
4
Cooperation between general practitioners, occupational health physicians, and rehabilitation physicians in Germany: what are problems and barriers to cooperation? A qualitative study.德国全科医生、职业健康医生和康复医生之间的合作:合作存在哪些问题和障碍?一项定性研究。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2017 Aug;90(6):481-490. doi: 10.1007/s00420-017-1210-6. Epub 2017 Mar 11.
5
[Deficiencies and barriers of the cooperation between German general practitioners and occupational health physicians? A qualitative content analysis of focus groups].[德国全科医生与职业健康医生合作中的不足与障碍?焦点小组的定性内容分析]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(9):639-48. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.09.027. Epub 2011 Oct 15.
6
Design of a study evaluating the effects, health economics, and stakeholder perspectives of a multi-component occupational rehabilitation program with an added workplace intervention - a  study protocol.一项多组分职业康复计划(增加了工作场所干预措施)的效果、健康经济学和利益相关者观点评估研究的设计 - 研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Feb 5;18(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5130-5.
7
Facilitators, barriers and ethical values related to the coordination of return-to-work among employees on sick leave due to common mental disorders: a protocol for a qualitative study (the CORE-project).常见心理障碍疾病导致员工休病假后返回工作岗位的协调相关的促进因素、障碍和伦理价值观:一项定性研究的方案(CORE 项目)。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 17;9(9):e032463. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032463.
8
Image and perception of physicians as barriers to inter-disciplinary cooperation? - the example of German occupational health physicians in the rehabilitation process: a qualitative study.医生的形象和认知是跨学科合作的障碍吗?——以德国职业健康医生在康复过程中的情况为例:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct 11;18(1):769. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3564-1.
9
General practitioners' and occupational health physicians' views on their cooperation: a cross-sectional postal survey.全科医生和职业健康医生对他们合作的看法:一项横断面邮政调查。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2016 Apr;89(3):449-59. doi: 10.1007/s00420-015-1084-4. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
10
How do Dutch GPs address work-related problems? A focus group study.荷兰全科医生如何应对工作相关问题?一项焦点小组研究。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2016 Sep;22(3):169-75. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2016.1177507. Epub 2016 Jun 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Image and perception of physicians as barriers to inter-disciplinary cooperation? - the example of German occupational health physicians in the rehabilitation process: a qualitative study.医生的形象和认知是跨学科合作的障碍吗?——以德国职业健康医生在康复过程中的情况为例:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct 11;18(1):769. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3564-1.
2
Optimizing cooperation between general practitioners, occupational health and rehabilitation physicians in Germany: a qualitative study.优化德国全科医生、职业健康和康复医生之间的合作:一项定性研究。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2017 Nov;90(8):809-821. doi: 10.1007/s00420-017-1239-6. Epub 2017 Jul 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term sick leave and graded return to work: What do we know about the follow-up effects?长期病假与分级复工:我们对后续影响了解多少?
Health Policy. 2016 Oct;120(10):1193-1201. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.09.001. Epub 2016 Sep 8.
2
Factors affecting return to work after injury or illness: best evidence synthesis of systematic reviews.伤病后影响重返工作岗位的因素:系统评价的最佳证据综合
Chiropr Man Therap. 2016 Sep 8;24(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12998-016-0113-z. eCollection 2016.
3
Effects of graded return-to-work: a propensity-score-matched analysis.
分级复工的效果:一项倾向得分匹配分析。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2016 Jul 1;42(4):273-9. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3562. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
4
[Update 2015 of the Working Group "Rehabilitation and Work" of the German Society for Rehabilitation Sciences].[德国康复科学协会“康复与工作”工作组2015年更新版]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2016 Feb;55(1):63-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-100230. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
5
Workplace interventions to prevent work disability in workers on sick leave.预防病假员工工作残疾的工作场所干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 5;2015(10):CD006955. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006955.pub3.
6
General practitioners' and occupational health physicians' views on their cooperation: a cross-sectional postal survey.全科医生和职业健康医生对他们合作的看法:一项横断面邮政调查。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2016 Apr;89(3):449-59. doi: 10.1007/s00420-015-1084-4. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
7
Long-term sick leave and the impact of a graded return-to-work program: evidence from Germany.长期病假与分级重返工作岗位计划的影响:来自德国的证据。
Eur J Health Econ. 2016 Jun;17(5):629-43. doi: 10.1007/s10198-015-0707-8. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
8
Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain.慢性下腰痛的多学科生物心理社会康复
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 2;2014(9):CD000963. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000963.pub3.
9
[Patient care at the interface between rehabilitation and occupational health physicians--a systematic literature review focusing health care organization].[康复医师与职业健康医师协作下的患者护理——聚焦医疗保健组织的系统文献综述]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2014 Aug;139(31-32):1609-14. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1370189. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
10
Qualitative meta-synthesis of survivors' work experiences and the development of strategies to facilitate return to work.幸存者工作经历的质性元综合分析及促进重返工作岗位策略的制定
J Cancer Surviv. 2014 Dec;8(4):657-70. doi: 10.1007/s11764-014-0377-z. Epub 2014 Jul 4.