Silva Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal, Carvalho Nancy Kudsi, Prado Marina C, Zanon Mayara, Senna Plinio Mendes, Souza Erick M, De-Deus Gustavo
Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Grande Rio University (UNIGRANRIO), Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Department of Endodontics, Rio de Janeiro State University (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
J Endod. 2016 Nov;42(11):1656-1659. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.08.009. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
The present study aimed to rank the bond strength to root dentin of a new injectable pozzolan-based root canal sealer, EndoSeal MTA, as compared with MTA Fillapex and AH Plus.
Eighteen dentinal slices (1 ± 0.1 mm) were obtained from the middle third of 6 maxillary incisors previously selected. Three canal-like holes with 0.8 mm diameter were drilled perpendicularly on the axial surface of each slice. Then, a standardized irrigation was applied for all holes that were subsequently filled with 1 of 3 test root canal sealers. After that, slices were stored in contact with phosphate-buffered saline solution (pH 7.2) for 7 days at 37°C before the push-out assay. Friedman test and Wilcoxon signed rank test with a Bonferroni correction were used to rank the results. Significance boundary was set at α = 5%.
Friedman test confirmed a significant dissimilarity in push-out ranks among the tested cements (P < .01). Wilcoxon signed rank test demonstrated AH Plus had significant superior resistance to dislodgment compared with Endo Seal (P < .01) or MTA Fillapex (P < .01), whereas MTA Fillapex presented the lowest push-out values as compared with Endo Seal (P < .01) or AH Plus (P < .01).
EndoSeal presents satisfactory bond strength performance for application in endodontic therapy compared with MTA Fillapex, and although it displays a new alternative of injectable bio-tight root canal sealer, it is not able to improve adhesion compared with AH Plus.
本研究旨在将一种新型可注射的基于火山灰的根管封闭剂EndoSeal MTA与MTA Fillapex和AH Plus相比,对其与牙根牙本质的粘结强度进行排名。
从先前选择的6颗上颌切牙的中三分之一处获取18个牙本质切片(1±0.1毫米)。在每个切片的轴向表面垂直钻出3个直径为0.8毫米的类似根管的孔。然后,对所有孔进行标准化冲洗,随后用3种测试根管封闭剂中的1种进行填充。之后,在进行推出试验之前,将切片与磷酸盐缓冲盐水溶液(pH 7.2)接触,在37°C下储存7天。使用Friedman检验和带有Bonferroni校正的Wilcoxon符号秩检验对结果进行排名。显著性界限设定为α = 5%。
Friedman检验证实,在所测试的粘固剂中,推出排名存在显著差异(P <.01)。Wilcoxon符号秩检验表明,与Endo Seal(P <.01)或MTA Fillapex(P <.01)相比,AH Plus具有显著更高的抗脱位性,而与Endo Seal(P <.01)或AH Plus(P <.01)相比,MTA Fillapex的推出值最低。
与MTA Fillapex相比,EndoSeal在牙髓治疗中的应用具有令人满意的粘结强度性能,尽管它展示了一种新型的可注射生物密封根管封闭剂替代方案,但与AH Plus相比,它在改善粘结方面并无优势。