Suppr超能文献

全膝关节置换术后使用的两种冷冻治疗设备的多方面比较:冷冻治疗设备比较

Multifaceted Comparison of Two Cryotherapy Devices Used After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Cryotherapy Device Comparison.

作者信息

Schinsky Mark F, McCune Christine, Bonomi Judith

机构信息

Mark F. Schinsky, MD, Castle Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine, S.C., Aurora, IL. Christine McCune, RN, BSN, CNRN, ONC, Rush-Copley Medical Center, Ortho Neuro Inpatient Nursing Administration, Aurora, IL. Judith Bonomi, RN, MS, MSN, OCN, NE-BC, Rush-Copley Medical Center, Ortho Neuro Inpatient Nursing Administration, Aurora, IL.

出版信息

Orthop Nurs. 2016 Sep-Oct;35(5):309-16. doi: 10.1097/NOR.0000000000000276.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Some form of cryotherapy used after total knee arthroplasty is commonplace. However, various factors determine the specific device deployed.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to answer the following questions:

METHODS

: A group of 100 patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty by a single surgeon were enrolled in an institutional review board-approved, prospective study and randomized to receive either a circulating cold water or ice/gel pack cryotherapy device postoperatively. Demographic, pain, swelling, blood loss, range of motion, compliance, satisfaction, and adverse event outcomes were recorded until 6 weeks after surgery. Hospital staff satisfaction and economic variables were examined.

RESULTS

The ice/gel pack cryotherapy wrap was noninferior to the cold water cryotherapy device for any patient outcome measured. Average pain level at 6 weeks postoperative was significantly less in the ice/gel pack cryotherapy wrap group. Hospital staff satisfaction was higher with the ice/gel pack cryotherapy wrap.Substantial economic savings can be realized at our institution by switching to the lower cost cryotherapy device.

CONCLUSION

In this study, the lower cost ice/gel pack cryotherapy wrap was noninferior to the circulating ice water cryotherapy device with respect to objective patient outcomes and subjective patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty. Hospital staff satisfaction and economic considerations also favor the ice/gel pack compression cryotherapy wraps.

摘要

背景

全膝关节置换术后使用某种形式的冷冻疗法很常见。然而,多种因素决定了所采用的具体设备。

目的

本研究旨在回答以下问题:

方法

一组由单一外科医生进行初次全膝关节置换术的100名患者被纳入一项经机构审查委员会批准的前瞻性研究,并随机分为术后接受循环冷水或冰/凝胶袋冷冻疗法设备的两组。记录人口统计学、疼痛、肿胀、失血、活动范围、依从性、满意度和不良事件结果,直至术后6周。检查医院工作人员的满意度和经济变量。

结果

对于所测量的任何患者结果,冰/凝胶袋冷冻疗法包裹物并不劣于冷水冷冻疗法设备。术后6周时,冰/凝胶袋冷冻疗法包裹物组的平均疼痛水平显著更低。医院工作人员对冰/凝胶袋冷冻疗法包裹物的满意度更高。通过改用成本较低的冷冻疗法设备,我们机构可以实现大量的经济节省。

结论

在本研究中,就全膝关节置换术后的客观患者结果和主观患者满意度而言,成本较低的冰/凝胶袋冷冻疗法包裹物并不劣于循环冰水冷冻疗法设备。医院工作人员满意度和经济因素也有利于冰/凝胶袋加压冷冻疗法包裹物。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验