Kouvaros Stylianos, Papatheodoropoulos Costas
Laboratory of Physiology, Department of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Patras, Rion, Greece.
Hippocampus. 2016 Dec;26(12):1542-1559. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22655. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
The hippocampal synapses display a conspicuous ability for long-term plasticity, which is thought to contribute to learning and memory. Previous research has shown that long-term potentiation (LTP) greatly differs between the dorsal (DH) and ventral (VH) CA1 hippocampal synapses when induced by high-frequency stimulation. In this study, using rat hippocampal slices and more physiologically relevant activity patterns based on the frequency of the theta rhythm (i.e., theta-burst stimulation, TBS) we found that the DH compared with the VH displayed a higher ability for induction and stability of NMDA receptor-dependent LTP of the field excitatory postsynaptic potential. Nevertheless, the maximal magnitude of LTP was similar in the two hippocampal segments. Blockade of GABA receptors prevented the LTP induction by the minimal effective TBS and reduced the magnitude of LTP induced by longer TBS. TBS produced a three-fold higher facilitation of the synaptic burst responses in the DH compared with the VH, accompanied by a strong enhancement in the postsynaptic excitation in the DH but mostly depression in the VH. The DH displayed NMDA receptor-dependent and NMDA receptor-independent facilitation, but the facilitation in the VH was only NMDA receptor-dependent. Also, the TBS-associated activity of GABA receptors was higher in the DH than in the VH. The different response profiles during TBS could underlie the differences in LTP between the two hippocampal segments. L-type voltage-dependent calcium channels (L-VDCC) and the metabotropic glutamate receptor-5 (mGluR5) equally contributed in DH and VH to compound LTP induced by relatively long TBS. We propose that these dorsoventral differences in synaptic plasticity reflect specializations of the intrinsic circuitry of the hippocampus, that are involved in the distinct information processing performed by the two hippocampal segments and could effectively support the contribution of the dorsal and the ventral hippocampal segment to single event memory and to emotional memory respectively. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
海马体突触表现出显著的长期可塑性能力,这种能力被认为有助于学习和记忆。先前的研究表明,当通过高频刺激诱导时,背侧(DH)和腹侧(VH)海马体CA1突触之间的长时程增强(LTP)存在很大差异。在本研究中,使用大鼠海马体切片以及基于theta节律频率的更符合生理的活动模式(即theta爆发刺激,TBS),我们发现与VH相比,DH表现出更高的场兴奋性突触后电位的NMDA受体依赖性LTP的诱导和稳定性能力。然而,两个海马体节段中LTP的最大幅度相似。GABA受体的阻断阻止了最小有效TBS诱导的LTP,并降低了较长TBS诱导的LTP幅度。与VH相比,TBS在DH中对突触爆发反应的易化作用高出三倍,同时伴随着DH中突触后兴奋的强烈增强,但在VH中大多是抑制。DH表现出NMDA受体依赖性和NMDA受体非依赖性易化作用,但VH中的易化作用仅为NMDA受体依赖性。此外,TBS相关的GABA受体活性在DH中高于VH。TBS期间不同的反应特征可能是两个海马体节段之间LTP差异的基础。L型电压依赖性钙通道(L-VDCC)和代谢型谷氨酸受体5(mGluR5)在DH和VH中对相对较长TBS诱导的复合LTP的贡献相同。我们提出,这些突触可塑性的背腹差异反映了海马体内在电路的特化,这些特化参与了两个海马体节段执行的不同信息处理,并可能分别有效地支持背侧和腹侧海马体节段对单事件记忆和情绪记忆的贡献。© 2016威利期刊公司