• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用扫描电子显微镜对17%乙二胺四乙酸、7%马来酸和2%氯己定去除根管玷污层效果的比较分析:一项体外研究。

Comparative analysis of endodontic smear layer removal efficacy of 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, 7% maleic acid, and 2% chlorhexidine using scanning electron microscope: An in vitro study.

作者信息

Attur Kailash, Joy Mathew T, Karim Riyas, Anil Kumar V J, Deepika C, Ahmed Haseena

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Narsinhbhai Patel Dental College and Hospital, Visnagar, Gujarat, India.

Department of Periodontology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Dental Sciences, Ernakulam, Kerala, India.

出版信息

J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2016 Aug;6(Suppl 2):S160-5. doi: 10.4103/2231-0762.189755.

DOI:10.4103/2231-0762.189755
PMID:27652250
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5022395/
Abstract

AIM

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficiency of different endodontic irrigants in the removal of smear layer through scanning electron microscopic image analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present in vitro study was carried out on 45 single-rooted extracted human mandibular premolar teeth with single canal and complete root formation. Teeth were randomly assigned to three groups with 15 teeth in each group. Group I samples were irrigated with 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic (EDTA) irrigation, Group II with 7% maleic acid irrigation, and Group III with 2% chlorhexidine irrigation. Scanning electron microscope evaluation was done for the assessment of smear layer removal in the coronal, middle, and apical thirds. Comparison of the smear layer removal between the three different groups was done by Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by Mann-Whitney U test for comparing individual groups. A P value less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

RESULTS

Statistically significant difference was seen between the two test groups (17% EDTA vs. 7% maleic acid and 17% EDTA vs. 2% chlorhexidine) in smear layer removal at coronal, middle, and apical thirds of the root canal. The most efficient smear layer removal was seen in Group I with 17% EDTA irrigation compared with other groups (P < 0.05) and the least by 2% chlorhexidine.

CONCLUSION

The present study shows that 17% EDTA efficiently removes the smear layer from root canal walls.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是通过扫描电子显微镜图像分析评估不同根管冲洗剂去除玷污层的效率。

材料与方法

本体外研究选取45颗单根、单根管且牙根完全形成的拔除的人类下颌前磨牙进行。牙齿随机分为三组,每组15颗。第一组样本用17%乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)冲洗,第二组用7%马来酸冲洗,第三组用2%氯己定冲洗。通过扫描电子显微镜评估根管冠部、中部和根尖三分之一处玷污层的去除情况。三组之间玷污层去除情况的比较采用Kruskal-Wallis检验,随后采用Mann-Whitney U检验比较各单独组。P值小于0.05被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

在根管冠部、中部和根尖三分之一处的玷污层去除方面,两个试验组(17% EDTA与7%马来酸以及17% EDTA与2%氯己定)之间存在统计学显著差异。与其他组相比,第一组用17% EDTA冲洗时玷污层去除效果最佳(P < 0.05),而2%氯己定冲洗时去除效果最差。

结论

本研究表明17% EDTA能有效去除根管壁上的玷污层。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c94/5022395/e10f1ca6e806/JISPCD-6-160-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c94/5022395/e10f1ca6e806/JISPCD-6-160-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c94/5022395/e10f1ca6e806/JISPCD-6-160-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative analysis of endodontic smear layer removal efficacy of 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, 7% maleic acid, and 2% chlorhexidine using scanning electron microscope: An in vitro study.使用扫描电子显微镜对17%乙二胺四乙酸、7%马来酸和2%氯己定去除根管玷污层效果的比较分析:一项体外研究。
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2016 Aug;6(Suppl 2):S160-5. doi: 10.4103/2231-0762.189755.
2
A comparative evaluation of smear layer removal by using edta, etidronic acid, and maleic acid as root canal irrigants: An in vitro scanning electron microscopic study.使用乙二胺四乙酸、依替膦酸和马来酸作为根管冲洗剂去除玷污层的比较评估:一项体外扫描电子显微镜研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2015 May-Jun;18(3):247-51. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.157266.
3
A Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal by Using Four Different Irrigation Solutions like Root Canal Irrigants: An SEM Study.四种根管冲洗液去除玷污层效果的比较评价:扫描电镜研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021 May 1;22(5):527-531.
4
Comparison of the efficacy of maleic acid and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid in smear layer removal from instrumented human root canal: a scanning electron microscopic study.比较马来酸和乙二胺四乙酸在去除器械处理人根管内玷污层的效果:扫描电镜研究。
J Endod. 2009 Nov;35(11):1573-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.07.021. Epub 2009 Sep 20.
5
Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer and Debris on the Canal Walls prepared with a Combination of Hand and Rotary ProTaper Technique using Scanning Electron Microscope.使用扫描电子显微镜对手动与旋转ProTaper技术联合制备的根管壁上的玷污层和碎屑进行比较评估。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016 Jul 1;17(7):574-81.
6
Scanning Electron Microscopy Analysis of Smear Layer Removal Ability of Conventional Endodontic Irrigation Regimen, MTAD, and QMix™ Versus a Mixture of Azadirachta indica and Citrus limon: An In Vitro Study.扫描电子显微镜分析传统牙髓治疗冲洗方案、MTAD、QMix™与印楝和柠檬混合液去除玷污层的能力:一项体外研究
Cureus. 2023 Aug 2;15(8):e42877. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42877. eCollection 2023 Aug.
7
A comparative scanning electron microscopy evaluation of smear layer removal with chitosan and MTAD.壳聚糖与MTAD去除玷污层的比较扫描电子显微镜评估
Niger J Clin Pract. 2018 Jan;21(1):76-80. doi: 10.4103/1119-3077.224798.
8
Evaluation of SmearOFF, maleic acid and two EDTA preparations in smear layer removal from root canal dentin.评价 SmearOFF、马来酸和两种 EDTA 制剂在去除根管牙本质玷污层中的作用。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2019 Jan;77(1):28-32. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2018.1495842. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
9
A comparative evaluation of smear layer removal by using ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid, citric acid, and maleic acid as root canal irrigants: An scanning electron microscopic study.使用乙二胺四乙酸、柠檬酸和马来酸作为根管冲洗剂去除玷污层的比较评价:一项扫描电子显微镜研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2020 Jan-Feb;23(1):71-78. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_43_20. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
10
Effect of different final irrigating solutions on smear layer removal in apical third of root canal: A scanning electron microscope study.不同终末冲洗液对根管根尖三分之一处玷污层去除效果的扫描电子显微镜研究
J Conserv Dent. 2016 Jan-Feb;19(1):87-90. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.173207.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of Smear Layer Removal and Push-Out Bond Strength Efficacy of Traditional and Herbal Root Canal Irrigants Across Different Root Levels: An In Vitro Study.不同根管水平下传统和草药根管冲洗剂去除玷污层及推出粘结强度效果的评估:一项体外研究
Cureus. 2024 Jul 14;16(7):e64511. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64511. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Effectiveness of Triton Irrigation Solution in Smear Layer Removal: An in-vitro Study. Triton 冲洗液去除玷污层效果的体外研究。
Eur Endod J. 2024 Mar 8;9(2):139 - 145. doi: 10.14744/eej.2023.58070. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
3
Efficacy of Smear Layer Removal of Human Teeth Root Canals Using Herbal and Chemical Irrigants: An In Vitro Study.

本文引用的文献

1
To Evaluate the Efficacy of an Innovative Irrigant on Smear Layer Removal - SEM Analysis.评估一种新型冲洗剂去除玷污层的效果——扫描电子显微镜分析
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Apr;10(4):ZC104-6. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/17200.7685. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
2
Smear layer removal efficacy of combination of herbal extracts in two different ratios either alone or supplemented with sonic agitation: An in vitro scanning electron microscope study.两种不同比例的草药提取物组合单独使用或辅以超声震荡时的玷污层去除效果:一项体外扫描电子显微镜研究
J Conserv Dent. 2015 Sep-Oct;18(5):374-8. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.164035.
3
A comparative evaluation of smear layer removal by using edta, etidronic acid, and maleic acid as root canal irrigants: An in vitro scanning electron microscopic study.
使用草药和化学冲洗剂去除人牙根根管玷污层的效果:一项体外研究。
Cureus. 2023 Jun 15;15(6):e40467. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40467. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
The effect of chitosan nanoparticle, citric acid, and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid on dentin smear layer using two different irrigation needles: A scanning electron microscope study.壳聚糖纳米颗粒、柠檬酸和乙二胺四乙酸对使用两种不同冲洗针的牙本质玷污层的影响:一项扫描电子显微镜研究
J Conserv Dent. 2022 Jul-Aug;25(4):431-435. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_178_22. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
5
A comparative evaluation of smear layer removal by using ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid, citric acid, and maleic acid as root canal irrigants: An scanning electron microscopic study.使用乙二胺四乙酸、柠檬酸和马来酸作为根管冲洗剂去除玷污层的比较评价:一项扫描电子显微镜研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2020 Jan-Feb;23(1):71-78. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_43_20. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
6
A Scanning Electron Microscope Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal and Antimicrobial Action of Mixture of Tetracycline, Acid and Detergent, Sodium Hypochlorite, Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid, and Chlorhexidine Gluconate: An Study.四环素、酸与去污剂混合物、次氯酸钠、乙二胺四乙酸和葡萄糖酸洗必泰对玷污层的去除及抗菌作用的扫描电子显微镜评估:一项研究
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2018 Jan-Feb;8(1):62-69. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_379_17. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
使用乙二胺四乙酸、依替膦酸和马来酸作为根管冲洗剂去除玷污层的比较评估:一项体外扫描电子显微镜研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2015 May-Jun;18(3):247-51. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.157266.
4
Time-dependent effects of chitosan on dentin structures.壳聚糖对牙本质结构的时间依赖性影响。
Braz Dent J. 2012;23(4):357-61. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402012000400008.
5
Chitosan: a new solution for removal of smear layer after root canal instrumentation.壳聚糖:根管器械预备后去除玷污层的新方法。
Int Endod J. 2013 Apr;46(4):332-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02119.x. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
6
Comparison of Endovac irrigation system with conventional irrigation for removal of intracanal smear layer: an in vitro study.Endovac冲洗系统与传统冲洗方法去除根管内玷污层的比较:一项体外研究
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011 Sep;112(3):407-11. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.02.024. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
7
Comparison of the efficacy of maleic acid and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid in smear layer removal from instrumented human root canal: a scanning electron microscopic study.比较马来酸和乙二胺四乙酸在去除器械处理人根管内玷污层的效果:扫描电镜研究。
J Endod. 2009 Nov;35(11):1573-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.07.021. Epub 2009 Sep 20.
8
Effect of EDTA with and without surfactants or ultrasonics on removal of smear layer.含或不含表面活性剂或超声波的乙二胺四乙酸对玷污层去除的影响
J Endod. 2007 Apr;33(4):472-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.12.007. Epub 2007 Feb 20.
9
Effect of smear layer on sealing ability of canal obturation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.玷污层对根管充填封闭能力的影响:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Endod. 2007 Feb;33(2):96-105. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.10.007.
10
In vitro antifungal efficacy of four irrigants as a final rinse.四种冲洗剂作为终末冲洗的体外抗真菌效果。
J Endod. 2006 Apr;32(4):331-3. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2005.08.017.