• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同根管水平下传统和草药根管冲洗剂去除玷污层及推出粘结强度效果的评估:一项体外研究

Assessment of Smear Layer Removal and Push-Out Bond Strength Efficacy of Traditional and Herbal Root Canal Irrigants Across Different Root Levels: An In Vitro Study.

作者信息

Shah Moksha, Patel Charles, Attur Kailash, Patel Nikunj, Attur Shylaja, Solanki Manali, Patel Aditi, Chhaya Palak, Pandya Dhruvi, Maheshwari Hetal

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Narsinhbhai Patel Dental College and Hospital, Sankalchand Patel University, Visnagar, IND.

Department of Oral Pathology, Narsinhbhai Patel Dental College and Hospital, Sankalchand Patel University, Visnagar, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Jul 14;16(7):e64511. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64511. eCollection 2024 Jul.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.64511
PMID:39139342
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11320874/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Endodontic therapy requires meticulous root canal debridement, pathogen elimination, and effective obturation to prevent microbial intrusion. The presence of the smear layer hinders sealer penetration, compromising sealing effectiveness. Sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine are esteemed endodontic irrigants. Herbal extracts like neem and tulsi, with antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory properties, show promise for root canal irrigation. The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of various irrigants in removing the smear layer and enhancing push-out bond strength at different root canal levels.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred mandibular premolars with single canals were collected, and 50 samples each were used for the smear layer and push-out bond strength analysis. Neem and tulsi extracts were prepared for irrigation. Teeth were decoronated, and up to 30 (6%) canals were prepared and were randomly divided into five groups based on irrigants used. A smear layer examination was conducted after longitudinally sectioning the tooth and sections were observed in a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Obturation was done in the remaining samples, and the push-out bond strength was assessed using a universal test machine.

RESULTS

Sodium hypochlorite showed the highest smear layer removal efficacy followed by chlorhexidine, neem, tulsi leaves with rose water extract, and normal saline. Chlorhexidine exhibited the highest push-out bond strength, with the coronal third presenting the strongest values, followed by neem, tulsi with rose water, normal saline, and sodium hypochlorite.

CONCLUSION

The study underscores the potential of herbal irrigants in endodontic therapy, indicating promising results while emphasizing the necessity for further clinical trials to validate their efficacy and other properties.

摘要

引言

根管治疗需要进行细致的根管清创、病原体清除以及有效的充填,以防止微生物侵入。玷污层的存在会阻碍封闭剂的渗透,从而降低封闭效果。次氯酸钠和氯己定是备受推崇的根管冲洗剂。印楝和罗勒等具有抗菌和抗炎特性的草药提取物在根管冲洗方面显示出应用前景。本研究旨在评估不同冲洗剂在去除玷污层以及提高不同根管水平的推出粘结强度方面的效果。

材料与方法

收集100颗单根管下颌前磨牙,将其中50个样本分别用于玷污层和推出粘结强度分析。制备了印楝和罗勒提取物用于冲洗。去除牙冠,预备多达30个(6%)根管,并根据所使用的冲洗剂随机分为五组。将牙齿纵向切片后进行玷污层检查,并在扫描电子显微镜(SEM)下观察切片。对其余样本进行充填,并使用万能试验机评估推出粘结强度。

结果

次氯酸钠显示出最高的玷污层去除效果,其次是氯己定、印楝、玫瑰水提取物罗勒叶和生理盐水。氯己定表现出最高的推出粘结强度,冠部三分之一处的值最强,其次是印楝、玫瑰水罗勒、生理盐水和次氯酸钠。

结论

该研究强调了草药冲洗剂在根管治疗中的潜力,表明了有前景的结果,同时强调有必要进行进一步的临床试验以验证其疗效和其他特性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e54a/11320874/fa2fca2fc08c/cureus-0016-00000064511-i05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e54a/11320874/92758f742507/cureus-0016-00000064511-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e54a/11320874/b0756ce606bf/cureus-0016-00000064511-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e54a/11320874/fa2fca2fc08c/cureus-0016-00000064511-i05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e54a/11320874/92758f742507/cureus-0016-00000064511-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e54a/11320874/b0756ce606bf/cureus-0016-00000064511-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e54a/11320874/fa2fca2fc08c/cureus-0016-00000064511-i05.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessment of Smear Layer Removal and Push-Out Bond Strength Efficacy of Traditional and Herbal Root Canal Irrigants Across Different Root Levels: An In Vitro Study.不同根管水平下传统和草药根管冲洗剂去除玷污层及推出粘结强度效果的评估:一项体外研究
Cureus. 2024 Jul 14;16(7):e64511. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64511. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Scanning Electron Microscopy Analysis of Smear Layer Removal Ability of Conventional Endodontic Irrigation Regimen, MTAD, and QMix™ Versus a Mixture of Azadirachta indica and Citrus limon: An In Vitro Study.扫描电子显微镜分析传统牙髓治疗冲洗方案、MTAD、QMix™与印楝和柠檬混合液去除玷污层的能力:一项体外研究
Cureus. 2023 Aug 2;15(8):e42877. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42877. eCollection 2023 Aug.
3
Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of different herbal irrigants on the removal of smear layer of primary teeth: A scanning electron microscopy study.不同草本冲洗液去除乳牙玷污层效果的比较评价:扫描电子显微镜研究。
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2020 Oct-Dec;38(4):374-380. doi: 10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_315_20.
4
Comparative Assessment of Novel Collagen Cross-linking Agents on Push-out Bond Strength of Two Different Sealers: An Study.新型胶原交联剂对两种不同封闭剂推出粘结强度的比较评估:一项研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2022 Nov 1;23(11):1122-1127. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3439.
5
The effect of different final irrigant activation techniques on the bond strength of an epoxy resin-based endodontic sealer: a preliminary study.不同最终冲洗剂激活技术对环氧树脂类根管封闭剂粘结强度的影响:一项初步研究。
J Endod. 2014 Jun;40(6):862-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.10.012. Epub 2013 Nov 9.
6
Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal Efficacy of Neem Leaf Extract, Propolis, and Orange Oil when used as Endodontic Irrigants: An Scanning Electron Microscopic Study.印楝叶提取物、蜂胶和橙油作为根管冲洗剂时去除玷污层效果的比较评价:一项扫描电子显微镜研究
Contemp Clin Dent. 2023 Apr-Jun;14(2):128-134. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_611_21. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
7
A Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal by Using Four Different Irrigation Solutions like Root Canal Irrigants: An SEM Study.四种根管冲洗液去除玷污层效果的比较评价:扫描电镜研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021 May 1;22(5):527-531.
8
Evaluation of the interaction between sodium hypochlorite and several formulations containing chlorhexidine and its effect on the radicular dentin--SEM and push-out bond strength analysis.次氯酸钠与几种含氯己定制剂之间的相互作用及其对根管牙本质影响的评估——扫描电子显微镜和推出粘结强度分析
Microsc Res Tech. 2014 Jan;77(1):17-22. doi: 10.1002/jemt.22307. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
9
Comparative Evaluation of Microhardness, Smear Layer Removal Efficacy and Depth of Penetration Using Punica granatum, Emblica officinalis and Sodium Hypochlorite As Endodontic Irrigants: An In Vitro Study.使用石榴、余甘子和次氯酸钠作为根管冲洗剂的显微硬度、玷污层去除效果和渗透深度的比较评估:一项体外研究。
Cureus. 2023 Sep 6;15(9):e44760. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44760. eCollection 2023 Sep.
10
Efficacy of various root canal irrigants on removal of smear layer in the primary root canals after hand instrumentation: a scanning electron microscopy study.手动预备后不同根管冲洗剂对乳牙根尖根管内玷污层去除效果的扫描电镜研究
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2010 Oct-Dec;28(4):271-7. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.76157.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative Evaluation of Microhardness, Smear Layer Removal Efficacy and Depth of Penetration Using Punica granatum, Emblica officinalis and Sodium Hypochlorite As Endodontic Irrigants: An In Vitro Study.使用石榴、余甘子和次氯酸钠作为根管冲洗剂的显微硬度、玷污层去除效果和渗透深度的比较评估:一项体外研究。
Cureus. 2023 Sep 6;15(9):e44760. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44760. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal Efficacy of Neem Leaf Extract, Propolis, and Orange Oil when used as Endodontic Irrigants: An Scanning Electron Microscopic Study.印楝叶提取物、蜂胶和橙油作为根管冲洗剂时去除玷污层效果的比较评价:一项扫描电子显微镜研究
Contemp Clin Dent. 2023 Apr-Jun;14(2):128-134. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_611_21. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
3
Efficacy of Smear Layer Removal of Human Teeth Root Canals Using Herbal and Chemical Irrigants: An In Vitro Study.使用草药和化学冲洗剂去除人牙根根管玷污层的效果:一项体外研究。
Cureus. 2023 Jun 15;15(6):e40467. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40467. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
Effect of different root canal irrigants on push-out bond strength of two novel root-end filling materials.不同根管冲洗液对两种新型根管封闭材料的推出粘结强度的影响。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Apr 2;23(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02858-7.
5
Pushout Bond Strength of Root Fillings after Irrigation of Root Canals Utilizing Sodium Hypochlorite, Chlorhexidine, and Homeopathic Mother Tincture ().使用次氯酸钠、氯己定和顺势疗法母酊剂冲洗根管后根充物的推出粘结强度()。
Clin Pract. 2023 Feb 17;13(1):305-314. doi: 10.3390/clinpract13010028.
6
A proposed classification system for herbal endodontic irrigants.一种针对草药牙髓冲洗剂的拟议分类系统。
J Conserv Dent. 2021 May-Jun;24(3):293-295. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_75_21. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
7
A comparative evaluation of smear layer removal by using ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid, citric acid, and maleic acid as root canal irrigants: An scanning electron microscopic study.使用乙二胺四乙酸、柠檬酸和马来酸作为根管冲洗剂去除玷污层的比较评价:一项扫描电子显微镜研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2020 Jan-Feb;23(1):71-78. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_43_20. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
8
Efficacy of different irrigation regimes on the push-out bond strength of various resin-based sealers at different root levels: An study.不同灌溉方式对不同根尖水平下各种树脂类封闭剂推出粘结强度的影响:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2018 Mar-Apr;21(2):125-129. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_337_16.
9
A Scanning Electron Microscope Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal and Antimicrobial Action of Mixture of Tetracycline, Acid and Detergent, Sodium Hypochlorite, Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid, and Chlorhexidine Gluconate: An Study.四环素、酸与去污剂混合物、次氯酸钠、乙二胺四乙酸和葡萄糖酸洗必泰对玷污层的去除及抗菌作用的扫描电子显微镜评估:一项研究
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2018 Jan-Feb;8(1):62-69. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_379_17. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
10
Comparative analysis of endodontic smear layer removal efficacy of 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, 7% maleic acid, and 2% chlorhexidine using scanning electron microscope: An in vitro study.使用扫描电子显微镜对17%乙二胺四乙酸、7%马来酸和2%氯己定去除根管玷污层效果的比较分析:一项体外研究。
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2016 Aug;6(Suppl 2):S160-5. doi: 10.4103/2231-0762.189755.