Braithwaite Jeffrey, Matsuyama Yukihiro, Mannion Russell, Johnson Julie, Bates David W, Hughes Cliff
Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Level 6, 75 Talavera Rd, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia.
Canon Institute of Global Studies, 11th Floor, ShinMarunouchi Building, 5-1 Marunouchi 1-chome, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-6511, Japan.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2016 Dec 1;28(6):843-846. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw113.
Health systems are continually being reformed. Why, and how? To answer these questions, we draw on a book we recently contributed, Healthcare Reform, Quality and Safety: Perspectives, Participants, Partnerships and Prospects in 30 Countries. We analyse the impact that these health-reform initiatives have had on the quality and safety of care in an international context-that is, in low-, middle- and high-income countries-Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Chile, China, Denmark, England, Ghana, Germany, the Gulf states, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Myanmar, New Zealand, Norway, Oman, Papua New Guinea (PNG), South Africa, the USA, Scotland and Sweden. Popular reforms in less well-off countries include boosting equity, providing infrastructure, and reducing mortality and morbidity in maternal and child health. In countries with higher GDP per capita, the focus is on new IT systems or trialling innovative funding models. Wealthy or less wealthy, countries are embracing ways to enhance quality of care and keep patients safe, via mechanisms such as accreditation, clinical guidelines and hand hygiene campaigns. Two timely reminders are that, first, a population's health is not determined solely by the acute system, but is a product of inter-sectoral effort-that is, measures to alleviate poverty and provide good housing, education, nutrition, running water and sanitation across the population. Second, all reformers and advocates of better-quality of care should include well-designed evaluation in their initiatives. Too often, improvement is assumed, not measured. That is perhaps the key message.
卫生系统一直在进行改革。原因是什么,又是如何改革的呢?为了回答这些问题,我们借鉴了我们最近参与撰写的一本书《医疗改革、质量与安全:30个国家的视角、参与者、伙伴关系及前景》。我们分析了这些医疗改革举措在国际背景下,即在低收入、中等收入和高收入国家——阿根廷、澳大利亚、巴西、智利、中国、丹麦、英格兰、加纳、德国、海湾国家、中国香港、印度、印度尼西亚、以色列、意大利、日本、墨西哥、缅甸、新西兰、挪威、阿曼、巴布亚新几内亚、南非、美国、苏格兰和瑞典——对医疗质量和安全产生的影响。较贫困国家推行的常见改革包括促进公平、提供基础设施以及降低母婴健康方面的死亡率和发病率。在人均国内生产总值较高的国家,重点则放在新的信息技术系统或试行创新的筹资模式上。无论富裕与否,各国都在通过诸如认证、临床指南和手卫生运动等机制,寻求提高医疗质量并保障患者安全的方法。需要适时提醒两点:其一,一个国家民众的健康并非仅由急症医疗系统决定,而是跨部门努力的结果——也就是说,需要采取措施减轻贫困,并为全体民众提供良好的住房、教育、营养、自来水和卫生设施。其二,所有医疗改革者以及倡导提高医疗质量的人都应在其举措中纳入精心设计的评估。很多时候,人们只是假定有所改进,却并未进行衡量。这或许就是关键信息。