Kanapeckas Kimberly L, Vigueira Cynthia C, Ortiz Aida, Gettler Kyle A, Burgos Nilda R, Fischer Albert J, Lawton-Rauh Amy L
Department of Genetics and Biochemistry, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, United States of America.
South Carolina Department of Natural Resources, Marine Resources Research Institute, Charleston, South Carolina, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 23;11(9):e0162676. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162676. eCollection 2016.
Domestication is the hallmark of evolution and civilization and harnesses biodiversity through selection for specific traits. In regions where domesticated lines are grown near wild relatives, congeneric sources of aggressive weedy genotypes cause major economic losses. Thus, the origins of weedy genotypes where no congeneric species occur raise questions regarding management effectiveness and evolutionary mechanisms responsible for weedy population success. Since eradication in the 1970s, California growers avoided weedy rice through continuous flood culture and zero-tolerance guidelines, preventing the import, presence, and movement of weedy seeds. In 2003, after decades of no reported presence in California, a weedy rice population was confirmed in dry-seeded fields. Our objectives were to identify the origins and establishment of this population and pinpoint possible phenotypes involved. We show that California weedy rice is derived from a different genetic source among a broad range of AA genome Oryzas and is most recently diverged from O. sativa temperate japonica cultivated in California. In contrast, other weedy rice ecotypes in North America (Southern US) originate from weedy genotypes from China near wild Oryza, and are derived through existing crop-wild relative crosses. Analyses of morphological data show that California weedy rice subgroups have phenotypes like medium-grain or gourmet cultivars, but have colored pericarp, seed shattering, and awns like wild relatives, suggesting that reversion to non-domestic or wild-like traits can occur following domestication, despite apparent fixation of domestication alleles. Additionally, these results indicate that preventive methods focused on incoming weed sources through contamination may miss burgeoning weedy genotypes that rapidly adapt, establish, and proliferate. Investigating the common and unique evolutionary mechanisms underlying global weed origins and subsequent interactions with crop relatives sheds light on how weeds evolve and addresses broader questions regarding the stability of selection during domestication and crop improvement.
驯化是进化和文明的标志,它通过选择特定性状来利用生物多样性。在种植驯化品种的地区附近生长着野生近缘种,具有侵略性的杂草基因型的同属来源会造成重大经济损失。因此,在没有同属物种的地区出现杂草基因型的起源引发了关于管理有效性以及杂草种群成功的进化机制的问题。自20世纪70年代根除杂草以来,加利福尼亚州的种植者通过持续的淹水栽培和零容忍准则避免了杂草稻的出现,防止了杂草种子的进口、存在和移动。2003年,在加利福尼亚州几十年没有报告出现杂草稻之后,在旱直播田中确认了一个杂草稻种群。我们的目标是确定这个种群的起源和建立,并找出可能涉及的表型。我们表明,加利福尼亚杂草稻源自广泛的AA基因组稻属中的一个不同遗传来源,并且最近与在加利福尼亚州种植的温带粳稻分化而来。相比之下,北美(美国南部)的其他杂草稻生态型源自中国靠近野生稻的杂草基因型,并通过现有的作物-野生近缘种杂交产生。形态学数据分析表明,加利福尼亚杂草稻亚群具有中粒或优质品种的表型,但具有像野生近缘种一样的有色果皮、种子易脱落和芒,这表明尽管驯化等位基因明显固定,但驯化后仍可能出现向非驯化或野生型性状的逆转。此外,这些结果表明,专注于通过污染防止外来杂草来源的预防方法可能会错过迅速适应、建立和繁殖的新兴杂草基因型。研究全球杂草起源以及随后与作物近缘种相互作用的共同和独特进化机制,有助于了解杂草如何进化,并解决关于驯化和作物改良过程中选择稳定性的更广泛问题。