• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于电子健康记录的研究中考虑选择偏倚的通用框架:观察到了哪些数据以及原因是什么?

A General Framework for Considering Selection Bias in EHR-Based Studies: What Data Are Observed and Why?

作者信息

Haneuse Sebastien, Daniels Michael

机构信息

Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health.

University of Texas-Austin.

出版信息

EGEMS (Wash DC). 2016 Aug 31;4(1):1203. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1203. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.13063/2327-9214.1203
PMID:27668265
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5013936/
Abstract

Electronic health records (EHR) data are increasingly seen as a resource for cost-effective comparative effectiveness research (CER). Since EHR data are collected primarily for clinical and/or billing purposes, their use for CER requires consideration of numerous methodologic challenges including the potential for confounding bias, due to a lack of randomization, and for selection bias, due to missing data. In contrast to the recent literature on confounding bias in EHR-based CER, virtually no attention has been paid to selection bias possibly due to the belief that standard methods for missing data can be readily-applied. Such methods, however, hinge on an overly simplistic view of the available/missing EHR data, so that their application in the EHR setting will often fail to completely control selection bias. Motivated by challenges we face in an on-going EHR-based comparative effectiveness study of choice of antidepressant treatment and long-term weight change, we propose a new general framework for selection bias in EHR-based CER. Crucially, the framework provides structure within which researchers can consider the complex interplay between numerous decisions, made by patients and health care providers, which give rise to health-related information being recorded in the EHR system, as well as the wide variability across EHR systems themselves. This, in turn, provides structure within which: (i) the transparency of assumptions regarding missing data can be enhanced, (ii) factors relevant to each decision can be elicited, and (iii) statistical methods can be better aligned with the complexity of the data.

摘要

电子健康记录(EHR)数据越来越被视为开展具有成本效益的比较效果研究(CER)的一种资源。由于EHR数据主要是为临床和/或计费目的而收集的,将其用于CER需要考虑众多方法学挑战,包括因缺乏随机化而导致的混杂偏倚可能性,以及因存在缺失数据而导致的选择偏倚可能性。与近期关于基于EHR的CER中混杂偏倚的文献形成对照的是,可能由于人们认为缺失数据的标准方法可以轻易应用,所以几乎没有人关注选择偏倚问题。然而,此类方法依赖于对可用/缺失的EHR数据的过于简单化观点,以至于它们在EHR环境中的应用往往无法完全控制选择偏倚。受我们在一项正在进行的基于EHR的抗抑郁治疗选择与长期体重变化比较效果研究中所面临挑战的启发,我们针对基于EHR的CER中的选择偏倚提出了一个新的通用框架。至关重要的是,该框架提供了一种架构,研究人员可以在此架构内考虑患者和医疗服务提供者做出的众多决策之间的复杂相互作用,这些决策导致与健康相关的信息被记录在EHR系统中,以及EHR系统本身之间的广泛差异。反过来,这又提供了一种架构,在此架构内:(i)可以增强关于缺失数据的假设的透明度,(ii)可以引出与每个决策相关的因素,并且(iii)统计方法可以更好地与数据的复杂性相匹配。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9bc/5013936/e3f5759f2fb9/egems1203f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9bc/5013936/2c8b08e5d2cb/egems1203f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9bc/5013936/209c41f6e603/egems1203f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9bc/5013936/5565a5248610/egems1203f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9bc/5013936/44088131e658/egems1203f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9bc/5013936/e3f5759f2fb9/egems1203f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9bc/5013936/2c8b08e5d2cb/egems1203f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9bc/5013936/209c41f6e603/egems1203f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9bc/5013936/5565a5248610/egems1203f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9bc/5013936/44088131e658/egems1203f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9bc/5013936/e3f5759f2fb9/egems1203f5.jpg

相似文献

1
A General Framework for Considering Selection Bias in EHR-Based Studies: What Data Are Observed and Why?基于电子健康记录的研究中考虑选择偏倚的通用框架:观察到了哪些数据以及原因是什么?
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2016 Aug 31;4(1):1203. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1203. eCollection 2016.
2
Adjusting for selection bias due to missing data in electronic health records-based research.调整电子健康记录研究中因数据缺失导致的选择偏差。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2021 Oct;30(10):2221-2238. doi: 10.1177/09622802211027601. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
3
Distinguishing Selection Bias and Confounding Bias in Comparative Effectiveness Research.比较效果研究中选择偏倚与混杂偏倚的辨别
Med Care. 2016 Apr;54(4):e23-9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000011.
4
Challenges in using electronic health record data for CER: experience of 4 learning organizations and solutions applied.使用电子健康记录数据进行临床效果研究的挑战:4 个学习型组织的经验及应用的解决方案。
Med Care. 2013 Aug;51(8 Suppl 3):S80-6. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31829b1d48.
5
CER Hub: An informatics platform for conducting comparative effectiveness research using multi-institutional, heterogeneous, electronic clinical data.CER中心:一个利用多机构、异构电子临床数据进行比较效果研究的信息学平台。
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Oct;84(10):763-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.06.002. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
6
Missing data matter: an empirical evaluation of the impacts of missing EHR data in comparative effectiveness research.缺失数据很重要:缺失电子健康记录数据对比较有效性研究影响的实证评估。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Jun 20;30(7):1246-1256. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad066.
7
Identifying Patients With High Data Completeness to Improve Validity of Comparative Effectiveness Research in Electronic Health Records Data.确定数据完整性高的患者,以提高电子健康记录数据中比较有效性研究的有效性。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018 May;103(5):899-905. doi: 10.1002/cpt.861. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
8
Statistical inference for association studies using electronic health records: handling both selection bias and outcome misclassification.基于电子健康记录的关联研究的统计推断:处理选择偏倚和结局错误分类。
Biometrics. 2022 Mar;78(1):214-226. doi: 10.1111/biom.13400. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
9
Comparative Effectiveness Research Through a Collaborative Electronic Reporting Consortium.通过协作电子报告联盟开展的比较效果研究。
Pediatrics. 2015 Jul;136(1):e215-24. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-0673. Epub 2015 Jun 22.
10
Addressing Bias in Electronic Health Record-Based Surveillance of Cardiovascular Disease Risk: Finding the Signal Through the Noise.解决基于电子健康记录的心血管疾病风险监测中的偏差:透过噪声找到信号。
Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2017 Dec;4(4):346-352. doi: 10.1007/s40471-017-0130-z. Epub 2017 Nov 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Robust causal inference for point exposures with missing confounders.针对存在混杂因素缺失的点暴露进行稳健的因果推断。
Can J Stat. 2025 Jun;53(2). doi: 10.1002/cjs.11832. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
2
Acute Respiratory Tract Infection and Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Multinational Cohort Study.急性呼吸道感染与突发性感音神经性听力损失:一项多国队列研究。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jun 9;15(12):1462. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15121462.
3
A Standardized Guideline for Assessing Extracted Electronic Health Records Cohorts: A Scoping Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Strategies for handling missing data in electronic health record derived data.电子健康记录衍生数据中缺失数据的处理策略。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2013 Dec 17;1(3):1035. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1035. eCollection 2013.
2
An electronic health records study of long-term weight gain following antidepressant use.一项关于使用抗抑郁药后长期体重增加的电子健康记录研究。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2014 Aug;71(8):889-96. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.414.
3
Role of electronic health records in comparative effectiveness research.电子健康记录在比较效果研究中的作用。
评估提取的电子健康记录队列的标准化指南:一项范围综述。
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2025 Jun 10;2025:527-536. eCollection 2025.
4
Implications of Data Extraction and Processing of Electronic Health Records for Epidemiological Research: Observational Study.电子健康记录的数据提取与处理对流行病学研究的影响:观察性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 11;27:e64628. doi: 10.2196/64628.
5
Estimating weighted quantile treatment effects with missing outcome data by double sampling.通过双重抽样对缺失结果数据估计加权分位数治疗效果。
Biometrics. 2025 Apr 2;81(2). doi: 10.1093/biomtc/ujaf038.
6
A common longitudinal intensive care unit data format (CLIF) for critical illness research.一种用于危重病研究的通用纵向重症监护病房数据格式(CLIF)。
Intensive Care Med. 2025 Mar;51(3):556-569. doi: 10.1007/s00134-025-07848-7. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
7
Real World Data Versus Probability Surveys for Estimating Health Conditions at the State Level.用于估计州级健康状况的真实世界数据与概率调查对比
J Surv Stat Methodol. 2024 Nov;12(5):1515-1530. doi: 10.1093/jssam/smae036.
8
Double Sampling for Informatively Missing Data in Electronic Health Record-Based Comparative Effectiveness Research.基于电子健康记录的比较效果研究中信息性缺失数据的双重抽样
Stat Med. 2024 Dec 30;43(30):6086-6098. doi: 10.1002/sim.10298. Epub 2024 Dec 5.
9
Modern sources of controls in case-control studies.病例对照研究中现代对照来源
Am J Epidemiol. 2025 Sep 3;194(9):2631-2640. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae437.
10
Applying Implementation Science to Advance Electronic Health Record-Driven Learning Health Systems: Case Studies, Challenges, and Recommendations.运用实施科学推进电子病历驱动的学习型健康系统:案例研究、挑战和建议。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 7;26:e55472. doi: 10.2196/55472.
J Comp Eff Res. 2013 Nov;2(6):529-32. doi: 10.2217/cer.13.65.
4
Caveats for the use of operational electronic health record data in comparative effectiveness research.使用操作性电子健康记录数据进行比较有效性研究的注意事项。
Med Care. 2013 Aug;51(8 Suppl 3):S30-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31829b1dbd.
5
Challenges in using electronic health record data for CER: experience of 4 learning organizations and solutions applied.使用电子健康记录数据进行临床效果研究的挑战:4 个学习型组织的经验及应用的解决方案。
Med Care. 2013 Aug;51(8 Suppl 3):S80-6. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31829b1d48.
6
Model feedback in Bayesian propensity score estimation.贝叶斯倾向得分估计中的模型反馈。
Biometrics. 2013 Mar;69(1):263-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2012.01830.x. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
7
Chapter 13: Mining electronic health records in the genomics era.第十三章:基因组时代的电子健康记录挖掘。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(12):e1002823. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002823. Epub 2012 Dec 27.
8
Methods and dimensions of electronic health record data quality assessment: enabling reuse for clinical research.电子健康记录数据质量评估的方法和维度:为临床研究提供可重用性。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jan 1;20(1):144-51. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000681. Epub 2012 Jun 25.
9
Bayesian effect estimation accounting for adjustment uncertainty.考虑调整不确定性的贝叶斯效应估计。
Biometrics. 2012 Sep;68(3):661-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01731.x. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
10
Obesity, psychiatric status, and psychiatric medications.肥胖、精神状态和精神科药物。
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2011 Dec;34(4):747-64. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2011.08.007. Epub 2011 Oct 19.