Muse Kate, McManus Freda, Rakovshik Sarah, Thwaites Richard
Department of Psychology, University of Worcester.
Department of Psychology, University of Stirling.
Psychol Assess. 2017 May;29(5):542-555. doi: 10.1037/pas0000372. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
This article outlines the development and psychometric evaluation of the Assessment of Core CBT Skills (ACCS) rating scale. The ACCS aims to provide a novel assessment framework to deliver formative and summative feedback regarding therapists' performance within observed cognitive-behavioral treatment sessions, and for therapists to rate and reflect on their own performance. Findings from 3 studies are outlined: (a) a feedback study (n = 66) examining content validity, face validity and usability; (b) a focus group (n = 9) evaluating usability and utility; and (c) an evaluation of the psychometric properties of the ACCS in real world cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) training and routine clinical practice contexts. Results suggest that the ACCS has good face validity, content validity, and usability and provides a user-friendly tool that is useful for promoting self-reflection and providing formative feedback. Scores on both the self and assessor-rated versions of the ACCS demonstrate good internal consistency, interrater reliability, and discriminant validity. In addition, ACCS scores were found to be correlated with, but distinct from, the Revised Cognitive Therapy Scale (CTS-R) and were comparable to CTS-R scores in terms of internal consistency and discriminant validity. In addition, the ACCS may have advantages over the CTS-R in terms of interrater reliability of scores. The studies also provided insight into areas for refinement and a number of modifications were undertaken to improve the scale. In summary, the ACCS is an appropriate and useful measure of CBT competence that can be used to promote self-reflection and provide therapists with formative and summative feedback. (PsycINFO Database Record
本文概述了核心认知行为疗法技能评估(ACCS)量表的开发及心理测量学评估。ACCS旨在提供一个全新的评估框架,以针对治疗师在观察到的认知行为治疗过程中的表现提供形成性和总结性反馈,同时供治疗师对自身表现进行评分和反思。文章概述了三项研究的结果:(a)一项反馈研究(n = 66),检验内容效度、表面效度和可用性;(b)一个焦点小组(n = 9),评估可用性和实用性;(c)在现实世界的认知行为疗法(CBT)培训和常规临床实践背景下对ACCS心理测量特性的评估。结果表明,ACCS具有良好的表面效度、内容效度和可用性,并提供了一个用户友好的工具,有助于促进自我反思并提供形成性反馈。ACCS的自评版和评估者评分版得分均显示出良好的内部一致性、评分者间信度和区分效度。此外,研究发现ACCS得分与修订后的认知疗法量表(CTS-R)相关,但又有所不同,并且在内部一致性和区分效度方面与CTS-R得分相当。此外,ACCS在评分者间信度方面可能优于CTS-R。这些研究还为量表的改进领域提供了见解,并进行了一些修改以完善该量表。总之,ACCS是一种衡量CBT能力的合适且有用的工具,可用于促进自我反思并为治疗师提供形成性和总结性反馈。(PsycINFO数据库记录)