Suppr超能文献

胰腺开放手术与微创坏死组织清除术——德国胰腺炎研究组的一项回顾性多中心分析

Open Surgical versus Minimal Invasive Necrosectomy of the Pancreas-A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis of the German Pancreatitis Study Group.

作者信息

Rasch Sebastian, Phillip Veit, Reichel Stephanie, Rau Bettina, Zapf Christian, Rosendahl Jonas, Halm Ulrich, Zachäus Markus, Müller Martin, Kleger Alexander, Neesse Albrecht, Hampe Jochen, Ellrichmann Mark, Rückert Felix, Strauß Peter, Arlt Alexander, Ellenrieder Volker, Gress Thomas M, Hartwig Werner, Klar Ernst, Mössner Joachim, Post Stefan, Schmid Roland M, Seufferlein Thomas, Siech Marco, Werner Jens, Will Uwe, Algül Hana

机构信息

II. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, Germany.

Department for Gastroenterology, SRH Wald-Klinikum Gera, Gera, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2016 Sep 26;11(9):e0163651. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163651. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Necrotising pancreatitis, and particularly infected necrosis, are still associated with high morbidity and mortality. Since 2011, a step-up approach with lower morbidity rates compared to initial open necrosectomy has been established. However, mortality and complication rates of this complex treatment are hardly studied thereafter.

METHODS

The German Pancreatitis Study Group performed a multicenter, retrospective study including 220 patients with necrotising pancreatitis requiring intervention, treated at 10 hospitals in Germany between January 2008 and June 2014. Data were analysed for the primary endpoints "severe complications" and "mortality" as well as secondary endpoints including "length of hospital stay", "follow up", and predisposing or prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Of all patients 13.6% were treated primarily with surgery and 86.4% underwent a step-up approach. More men (71.8%) required intervention for necrotising pancreatitis. The most frequent etiology was biliary (41.4%) followed by alcohol (29.1%). Compared to open necrosectomy, the step-up approach was associated with a lower number of severe complications (primary composite endpoint including sepsis, persistent multiorgan dysfunction syndrome (MODS) and erosion bleeding: 44.7% vs. 73.3%), lower mortality (10.5% vs. 33.3%) and lower rates of diabetes mellitus type 3c (4.7% vs. 33.3%). Low hematocrit and low blood urea nitrogen at admission as well as a history of acute pancreatitis were prognostic for less complications in necrotising pancreatitis. A combination of drainage with endoscopic necrosectomy resulted in the lowest rate of severe complications.

CONCLUSION

A step-up approach starting with minimal invasive drainage techniques and endoscopic necrosectomy results in a significant reduction of morbidity and mortality in necrotising pancreatitis compared to a primarily surgical intervention.

摘要

背景

坏死性胰腺炎,尤其是感染性坏死,仍然与高发病率和死亡率相关。自2011年以来,与最初的开放性坏死组织清除术相比,一种发病率较低的逐步治疗方法已经确立。然而,此后这种复杂治疗的死亡率和并发症发生率鲜有研究。

方法

德国胰腺炎研究小组进行了一项多中心回顾性研究,纳入了2008年1月至2014年6月期间在德国10家医院接受治疗的220例需要干预的坏死性胰腺炎患者。分析了主要终点“严重并发症”和“死亡率”以及次要终点,包括“住院时间”“随访”以及诱发因素或预后因素的数据。

结果

所有患者中,13.6%主要接受手术治疗,86.4%采用逐步治疗方法。更多男性(71.8%)因坏死性胰腺炎需要干预。最常见的病因是胆源性(41.4%),其次是酒精性(29.1%)。与开放性坏死组织清除术相比,逐步治疗方法的严重并发症数量较少(主要复合终点包括脓毒症、持续性多器官功能障碍综合征(MODS)和侵蚀性出血:44.7%对73.3%),死亡率较低(10.5%对33.3%),3c型糖尿病发生率较低(4.7%对33.3%)。入院时低血细胞比容和低血尿素氮以及急性胰腺炎病史是坏死性胰腺炎并发症较少的预后因素。引流与内镜下坏死组织清除术联合应用导致严重并发症发生率最低。

结论

与主要的手术干预相比,以微创引流技术和内镜下坏死组织清除术开始的逐步治疗方法可显著降低坏死性胰腺炎的发病率和死亡率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/910f/5036800/6670aceddbed/pone.0163651.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验