Sellers Sherrill L, Moss Melissa E, Calzone Kathleen, Abdallah Khadijah E, Jenkins Jean F, Bonham Vence L
*Associate Dean for Undergraduate Education and Professor, Department of Family Studies and Social Work, Miami University, Oxford, OH, USA.
*Postbaccalaureate Intramural Research Training Award (IRTA) Fellow, Health Disparities Unit, Social and Behavioral Research Branch, Division of Intramural Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2016 Nov;48(6):577-586. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12251. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
To examine nurses' self-reported use of race in clinical evaluation.
This cross-sectional study analyzed data collected from three separate studies using the Genetics and Genomics in Nursing Practice Survey, which includes items about use of race and genomic information in nursing practice. The Racial Attributes in Clinical Evaluation (RACE) scale was used to measure explicit clinical use of race among nurses from across the United States.
Multivariate regression analysis was used to examine associations between RACE score and individual-level characteristics and beliefs in 5,733 registered nurses.
Analysis revealed significant relationships between RACE score and nurses' race and ethnicity, educational level, and views on the clinical importance of patient demographic characteristics. Asian nurses reported RACE scores 1.41 points higher than White nurses (p < .001), and Black nurses reported RACE scores 0.55 points higher than White nurses (p < .05). Compared to diploma-level nurses, the baccalaureate-level nurses reported 0.69 points higher RACE scores (p < .05), master's-level nurses reported 1.63 points higher RACE scores (p < .001), and doctorate-level nurses reported 1.77 points higher RACE scores (p < .01). In terms of clinical importance of patient characteristics, patient race and ethnicity corresponded to a 0.54-point increase in RACE score (p < .001), patient genes to a 0.21-point increase in RACE score (p < .001), patient family history to a 0.15-point increase in RACE score (p < .01), and patient age to a 0.19-point increase in RACE score (p < .001).
Higher reported use of race among minority nurses may be due, in part, to differential levels of racial self-awareness. A relatively linear positive relationship between level of nursing degree nursing education and use of race suggests that a stronger foundation of knowledge about genetic ancestry, population genetics and the concept "race" and genetic ancestry may increase in clinical decision making could allow nurses to more appropriately use of race in clinical care. Integrating patient demographic characteristics into clinical decisions is an important component of nursing practice.
Registered nurses provide care for diverse racial and ethnic patient populations and stand on the front line of clinical care, making them essential for reducing racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare delivery. Exploring registered nurses' individual-level characteristics and clinical use of race may provide a more comprehensive understanding of specific training needs and inform nursing education and practice.
研究护士在临床评估中自我报告的种族运用情况。
这项横断面研究分析了从三项独立研究中收集的数据,这些研究使用了《护理实践中的遗传学和基因组学调查》,其中包括有关护理实践中种族和基因组信息运用的项目。临床评估中的种族属性(RACE)量表用于衡量美国各地护士在临床中对种族的明确运用情况。
采用多元回归分析来检验5733名注册护士的RACE得分与个体特征及信念之间的关联。
分析显示,RACE得分与护士的种族和民族、教育水平以及对患者人口统计学特征临床重要性的看法之间存在显著关系。亚裔护士报告的RACE得分比白人护士高1.41分(p <.001),黑人护士报告的RACE得分比白人护士高0.55分(p <.05)。与文凭水平的护士相比,学士学位水平的护士报告的RACE得分高0.69分(p <.05),硕士学位水平的护士报告的RACE得分高1.63分(p <.001),博士学位水平的护士报告的RACE得分高1.77分(p <.01)。就患者特征的临床重要性而言,患者的种族和民族使RACE得分增加0.54分(p <.001),患者基因使RACE得分增加 .21分(p <.001),患者家族史使RACE得分增加0.15分(p <.01),患者年龄使RACE得分增加0.19分(p <.001)。
少数族裔护士报告的更高的种族运用情况可能部分归因于不同程度的种族自我意识。护理学位教育水平与种族运用之间相对呈线性的正相关关系表明,关于遗传血统、群体遗传学以及“种族”和遗传血统概念的更坚实知识基础,可能会增加临床决策中护士更恰当地在临床护理中运用种族的能力。将患者人口统计学特征纳入临床决策是护理实践的一个重要组成部分。
注册护士为不同种族和民族的患者群体提供护理,站在临床护理的前线,这使他们对于减少医疗保健提供中的种族和民族差异至关重要。探索注册护士的个体特征和种族在临床中的运用情况,可能会更全面地了解特定的培训需求,并为护理教育和实践提供信息。