• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与共同设计护理流程的患者体验。

The Experience of Patients Engaged in Co-designing Care Processes.

作者信息

Lavoie-Tremblay Mélanie, O'Connor Patricia, Biron Alain, MacGibbon Brenda, Cyr Guylaine, Fréchette Julie

机构信息

Author Affiliations: Ingram School of Nursing, McGill University (Drs Lavoie-Tremblay and Cyr and Ms O'Connor); McGill University Health Center (Dr Biron and Ms O'Connor); Department of Mathematics, University of Quebec at Montreal (Dr MacGibbon); and Douglas Mental Health University Institute (Ms Fréchette), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2016 Oct/Dec;35(4):284-293. doi: 10.1097/HCM.0000000000000132.

DOI:10.1097/HCM.0000000000000132
PMID:27676370
Abstract

This article presents the experiences of patients engaged in co-designing care under a program entitled, "Transforming Care at the Bedside," based at an academic health sciences center. This descriptive, qualitative study collected data through individual interviews. Participants included patients from 5 units in an academic health sciences center in Quebec, Canada. A total of 6 individual interviews were conducted in November 2014, 15 months after the Transforming Care at the Bedside work began in September 2013. Content analysis was used to analyze the qualitative data. Being listened to and informed gave patients an opportunity to better understand patient needs and the complexity of care in the unit and in the organization. The experience enabled patients to better translate the patient experience for the team's benefit and influence the team's perspective and decisions. Through this experience, several patients felt motivated and empowered and that they afforded consideration through this experience. This study highlights the importance of creating opportunities for patients and health care providers to share their unique experiences and expertise to better understand each other's reality. In this context, they developed a more comprehensive understanding of the issues and worked together to implement realistic changes on behalf of the patients.

摘要

本文介绍了参与一个名为“床边护理变革”项目的患者的经历,该项目设在一所学术健康科学中心。这项描述性定性研究通过个人访谈收集数据。参与者包括来自加拿大魁北克一所学术健康科学中心5个科室的患者。在2013年9月“床边护理变革”工作开始15个月后的2014年11月,共进行了6次个人访谈。采用内容分析法对定性数据进行分析。被倾听和了解情况让患者有机会更好地理解患者需求以及科室和机构中护理工作的复杂性。这种经历使患者能够更好地为团队利益诠释患者体验,并影响团队的观点和决策。通过这次经历,一些患者感到受到激励和有了力量,并且觉得自己通过这次经历得到了考虑。本研究强调了为患者和医疗服务提供者创造机会以分享他们独特的经验和专业知识从而更好地了解彼此现实情况的重要性。在这种背景下,他们对问题有了更全面的理解,并共同努力为患者实施切实可行的变革。

相似文献

1
The Experience of Patients Engaged in Co-designing Care Processes.参与共同设计护理流程的患者体验。
Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2016 Oct/Dec;35(4):284-293. doi: 10.1097/HCM.0000000000000132.
2
Effective Strategies to Spread Redesigning Care Processes Among Healthcare Teams.在医疗团队中推广重新设计护理流程的有效策略。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2015 Jul;47(4):328-37. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12141. Epub 2015 May 11.
3
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
4
CE: Original research: the perceptions of health care team members about engaging patients in care redesign.CE:原创研究:医疗团队成员对让患者参与护理重新设计的看法。
Am J Nurs. 2014 Jul;114(7):38-46; quiz 47-8. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000451676.58823.ab.
5
The Effects of the Transforming Care at the Bedside Program on Perceived Team Effectiveness and Patient Outcomes.
Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2017 Jan/Mar;36(1):10-20. doi: 10.1097/HCM.0000000000000142.
6
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
7
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
8
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
9
Implementing and Using a Patient Portal: A qualitative exploration of patient and provider perspectives on engaging patients.实施和使用患者门户网站:对患者和提供者关于吸引患者参与的观点进行定性探索。
J Innov Health Inform. 2016 Jul 4;23(2):848. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v23i2.848.
10
Exploring challenges in the patient's discharge process from the internal medicine service: A qualitative study of patients' and providers' perceptions.探索内科服务中患者出院流程的挑战:一项关于患者和医护人员看法的定性研究
J Interprof Care. 2017 Sep;31(5):566-574. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2017.1322562. Epub 2017 Jul 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
2
Co-design to deliver service improvement: What does this mean and how can we do it? A qualitative study with upper gastrointestinal cancer patients and professionals.共同设计以实现服务改进:这意味着什么,我们应该如何实现?一项针对上消化道癌症患者和专业人士的定性研究。
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2023 Mar;6(3):e1748. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1748. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
3
Mapping the role of patient and public involvement during the different stages of healthcare innovation: A scoping review.
绘制患者和公众参与医疗创新不同阶段的作用图谱:范围综述。
Health Expect. 2022 Jun;25(3):840-855. doi: 10.1111/hex.13437. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
4
Development of communication tool for resident- and family-led care discussions in long-term care through patient and family engagement.通过患者和家属的参与,为长期护理中的居民和家属主导的护理讨论开发沟通工具。
Int J Older People Nurs. 2022 Mar;17(2):e12429. doi: 10.1111/opn.12429. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
5
Co-produced capability framework for successful patient and staff partnerships in healthcare quality improvement: results of a scoping review.共同制定能力框架,以成功建立医疗保健质量改进中的患者和员工伙伴关系:范围综述的结果。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 Feb;31(2):134-146. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-012729. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
6
[Not Available].[无可用内容]。
Can Oncol Nurs J. 2018 Apr 1;28(2):102-109. doi: 10.5737/23688076282102109. eCollection 2018 Spring.
7
Partnership between patients, nurse leaders and researchers: Outcomes of a web-based KT strategy for hospital discharge planning and care transitions in oncology.患者、护理领导者与研究人员之间的合作:一项基于网络的知识转化策略在肿瘤学医院出院计划及护理过渡方面的成果
Can Oncol Nurs J. 2018 Apr 1;28(2):110-117. doi: 10.5737/23688076282110117. eCollection 2018 Spring.