Suppr超能文献

美国医生诊断家族性高胆固醇血症的实践:来自 CASCADE-FH 登记处的数据。

US physician practices for diagnosing familial hypercholesterolemia: data from the CASCADE-FH registry.

机构信息

Division of Nutrition and Metabolic Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA.

Lancaster General Health/Penn Medicine, Lancaster, PA, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Lipidol. 2016 Sep-Oct;10(5):1223-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2016.07.011. Epub 2016 Aug 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the US familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), patients are underidentified, despite an estimated prevalence of 1:200 to 1:500. Criteria to identify FH patients include Simon Broome, Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN), or Make Early Diagnosis to Prevent Early Deaths (MEDPED). The use of these criteria in US clinical practices remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the FH diagnostic criteria applied by US lipid specialists participating in the FH Foundation's CASCADE FH (CAscade SCreening for Awareness and DEtection of Familial Hypercholesterolemia) patient registry.

METHODS

We performed an observational, cross-sectional analysis of diagnostic criteria chosen for each adult patient, both overall and by baseline patient characteristics, at 15 clinical sites that had contributed data to the registry as of September 8, 2015. A sample of 1867 FH adults was analyzed. The median age at FH diagnosis was 50 years, and the median pretreatment low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) value was 238 mg/dL. The main outcome was the diagnostic criteria chosen. Diagnostic criteria were divided into five nonexclusive categories: "clinical diagnosis," MEDPED, Simon Broome, DLCN, and other.

RESULTS

Most adults enrolled in CASCADE FH (55.0%) received a "clinical diagnosis." The most commonly used formal criteria was Simon-Broome only (21%), followed by multiple diagnostic criteria (16%), MEDPED only (7%), DLCN only (1%), and other (0.5%), P < .0001. Of the patients with only a "clinical diagnosis," 93% would have met criteria for Simon Broome, DLCN, or MEDPED based on the data available in the registry.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrate heterogeneity in the application of FH diagnostic criteria in the United States. A nationwide consensus definition may lead to better identification, earlier treatment, and ultimately CHD prevention.

摘要

背景

在美国,家族性高胆固醇血症(FH)患者的漏诊率很高,估计患病率为 1/200 至 1/500。识别 FH 患者的标准包括 Simon Broome、荷兰血脂临床网络(DLCN)或早期诊断以预防早期死亡(MEDPED)。这些标准在美国临床实践中的应用尚不清楚。

目的

描述参与 FH 基金会 CASCADE FH(FH 患者筛查以提高认识和 FH 检出率)患者注册研究的美国血脂专家应用的 FH 诊断标准。

方法

我们对截至 2015 年 9 月 8 日已向该注册研究提供数据的 15 个临床中心的每位成年患者应用的诊断标准进行了一项观察性、横断面分析。该研究共分析了 1867 名 FH 成年患者。FH 诊断时的中位年龄为 50 岁,中位治疗前低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)值为 238mg/dL。主要结局是选择的诊断标准。诊断标准分为五个非排他性类别:“临床诊断”、MEDPED、Simon Broome、DLCN 和其他。

结果

在 CASCADE FH 注册研究中,大多数成年患者(55.0%)接受了“临床诊断”。最常用的正式标准是仅 Simon Broome(21%),其次是多种诊断标准(16%)、仅 MEDPED(7%)、仅 DLCN(1%)和其他(0.5%),P<.0001。在仅接受“临床诊断”的患者中,根据注册研究中可用的数据,93%的患者将符合 Simon Broome、DLCN 或 MEDPED 的标准。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,FH 诊断标准在美国的应用存在异质性。全美范围内的共识定义可能会导致更好的识别、更早的治疗,并最终预防 CHD。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Genomic Screening at a Single Health System.单一医疗系统中的基因组筛查
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e250917. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0917.
5
Familial Hypercholesterolemia: From Clinical Suspicion to Novel Treatments.家族性高胆固醇血症:从临床怀疑到新型治疗
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Nov 9;24(11):311. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2411311. eCollection 2023 Nov.
9
Genetic Testing for Familial Hypercholesterolemia in Clinical Practice.临床实践中的家族性高胆固醇血症基因检测。
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2023 May;25(5):197-208. doi: 10.1007/s11883-023-01094-2. Epub 2023 Apr 15.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验