Ceslowitz S B
School of Nursing, State University of New York, Stony Brook.
J Adv Nurs. 1989 Jul;14(7):553-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1989.tb01590.x.
This study examined the relationship between use of coping strategies and burnout among 150 randomly selected staff nurses from four hospitals. The instruments used were the frequency dimension of the Maslach Burnout Inventory (Maslach & Jackson 1981) and the Ways of Coping (Revised) (Folkman & Lazarus 1985). In the canonical correlation analysis, two significant canonical variate sets differentiated nurses on the dimension of burnout. Nurses who experienced increased levels of burnout used the coping strategies of escape/avoidance, self-controlling and confronting (P less than 0.001). Nurses who experience decreased levels of burnout used the coping strategies of planful problem solving, positive reappraisal, seeking social support, and self-controlling (P less than 0.003). Self-controlling coping, although present in both variate sets, was used to a lesser extent by nurses with decreased burnout levels. The positive relationship between planful problem solving and reduced burnout levels supports the theoretical framework of Lazarus. This framework asserts that during the appraisal process, persons evaluate the harmfulness of an event and their own coping resources. Persons with lower levels of burnout may perceive the event as amenable to change or they may perceive their coping resources as adequate. Either perception may promote the view that the situation is amenable to problem solving. Another rationale for the effectiveness of particular coping strategies may lie in the reactions that these strategies engender in others. The use of planful problem solving, seeking social support and positive reappraisal has been reported to result in the offering of greater social support than when confronting and self-controlling coping were used.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
本研究调查了从四家医院随机选取的150名在职护士应对策略的使用与职业倦怠之间的关系。所使用的工具为马氏职业倦怠量表(Maslach & Jackson,1981)的频率维度以及应对方式问卷(修订版)(Folkman & Lazarus,1985)。在典型相关分析中,两组显著的典型变量集在职业倦怠维度上区分了护士。职业倦怠程度增加的护士采用逃避/回避、自我控制和对抗的应对策略(P<0.001)。职业倦怠程度降低的护士采用有计划地解决问题、积极重新评价、寻求社会支持和自我控制的应对策略(P<0.003)。自我控制应对虽然在两组变量中都存在,但职业倦怠程度降低的护士使用程度较低。有计划地解决问题与降低职业倦怠水平之间的正相关支持了拉扎勒斯的理论框架。该框架认为,在评估过程中,人们会评估事件的危害性以及自身的应对资源。职业倦怠水平较低的人可能认为该事件易于改变,或者他们可能认为自己的应对资源充足。这两种认知都可能促使人们认为该情况适合解决问题。特定应对策略有效性的另一个理由可能在于这些策略在他人身上引发的反应。据报道,与使用对抗和自我控制应对策略相比,使用有计划地解决问题、寻求社会支持和积极重新评价会带来更多的社会支持。(摘要截选至250词)