Suppr超能文献

失语症中内心言语的主观体验:初步行为关系及神经关联

Subjective experience of inner speech in aphasia: Preliminary behavioral relationships and neural correlates.

作者信息

Fama Mackenzie E, Hayward William, Snider Sarah F, Friedman Rhonda B, Turkeltaub Peter E

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States.

Department of Neurology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States.

出版信息

Brain Lang. 2017 Jan;164:32-42. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2016.09.009. Epub 2016 Sep 29.

Abstract

Many individuals with aphasia describe anomia with comments like "I know it but I can't say it." The exact meaning of such phrases is unclear. We hypothesize that at least two discrete experiences exist: the sense of (1) knowing a concept, but failing to find the right word, and (2) saying the correct word internally but not aloud (successful inner speech, sIS). We propose that sIS reflects successful lexical access; subsequent overt anomia indicates post-lexical output deficits. In this pilot study, we probed the subjective experience of anomia in 37 persons with aphasia. Self-reported sIS related to aphasia severity and phonological output deficits. In multivariate lesion-symptom mapping, sIS was associated with dorsal stream lesions, particularly in ventral sensorimotor cortex. These preliminary results suggest that people with aphasia can often provide meaningful insights about their experience of anomia and that reports of sIS relate to specific lesion locations and language deficits.

摘要

许多失语症患者在描述命名障碍时会说“我知道它,但我说不出来”。这类表述的确切含义尚不清楚。我们推测至少存在两种不同的体验:一是(1)知道某个概念,但找不到合适的词语;二是(2)在内心说出了正确的词语,但没有大声说出来(成功的内部言语,sIS)。我们认为,sIS反映了词汇通达的成功;随后出现的明显命名障碍表明存在词汇后输出缺陷。在这项初步研究中,我们探究了37名失语症患者命名障碍的主观体验。自我报告的sIS与失语症严重程度及语音输出缺陷有关。在多变量病灶-症状映射分析中,sIS与背侧通路损伤相关,尤其是腹侧感觉运动皮层的损伤。这些初步结果表明,失语症患者通常能够对其命名障碍体验提供有意义的见解,且sIS报告与特定的病灶位置和语言缺陷有关。

相似文献

1
Subjective experience of inner speech in aphasia: Preliminary behavioral relationships and neural correlates.
Brain Lang. 2017 Jan;164:32-42. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2016.09.009. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
2
Objective support for subjective reports of successful inner speech in two people with aphasia.
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2016 Jul-Sep;33(5-6):299-314. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2016.1192998. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
3
Self-reported inner speech relates to phonological retrieval ability in people with aphasia.
Conscious Cogn. 2019 May;71:18-29. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2019.03.005. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
4
The Subjective Experience of Inner Speech in Aphasia Is a Meaningful Reflection of Lexical Retrieval.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Jan 30;62(1):106-122. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-18-0222.
5
Anomia training and brain stimulation in chronic aphasia.
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2011 Oct;21(5):717-41. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2011.621275.
6
Electrophysiological correlates of different anomic patterns in comparison with normal word production.
Cortex. 2009 Jun;45(6):697-707. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2008.09.007. Epub 2008 Nov 19.
7
The Subjective Experience of Word-Finding Difficulties in People With Aphasia: A Thematic Analysis of Interview Data.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2022 Jan 18;31(1):3-11. doi: 10.1044/2021_AJSLP-20-00265. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
8
Common and divergent neural correlates of anomia in amnestic and logopenic presentations of Alzheimer's disease.
Cortex. 2017 Jan;86:45-54. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.10.019. Epub 2016 Nov 5.
9
On the nature of naming difficulties in aphasia.
Cortex. 1992 Dec;28(4):537-54. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(13)80226-2.
10
Variation in language mixing in multilingual aphasia.
Clin Linguist Phon. 2019;33(10-11):915-929. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2019.1584646. Epub 2019 Mar 5.

引用本文的文献

2
Semantic language decoding across participants and stimulus modalities.
Curr Biol. 2025 Mar 10;35(5):1023-1032.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2025.01.024. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
3
Evidence from aphasia suggests a bidirectional relationship between inner speech and executive function.
Neuropsychologia. 2024 Nov 5;204:108997. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2024.108997. Epub 2024 Sep 7.
5
Inner speech in the daily lives of people with aphasia.
Front Psychol. 2024 Mar 21;15:1335425. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1335425. eCollection 2024.
7
Distinguishing semantic control and phonological control and their role in aphasic deficits: A task switching investigation.
Neuropsychologia. 2022 Aug 13;173:108302. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108302. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
8
Motor Circuit and Superior Temporal Sulcus Activities Linked to Individual Differences in Multisensory Speech Perception.
Brain Topogr. 2021 Nov;34(6):779-792. doi: 10.1007/s10548-021-00869-7. Epub 2021 Sep 4.
9
The Subjective Experience of Word-Finding Difficulties in People With Aphasia: A Thematic Analysis of Interview Data.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2022 Jan 18;31(1):3-11. doi: 10.1044/2021_AJSLP-20-00265. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
10
Dissociable Mechanisms of Verbal Working Memory Revealed through Multivariate Lesion Mapping.
Cereb Cortex. 2020 Apr 14;30(4):2542-2554. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhz259.

本文引用的文献

1
Objective support for subjective reports of successful inner speech in two people with aphasia.
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2016 Jul-Sep;33(5-6):299-314. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2016.1192998. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
2
Conflict monitoring in speech processing: An fMRI study of error detection in speech production and perception.
Neuroimage. 2016 Feb 1;126:96-105. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.037. Epub 2015 Nov 19.
3
Negative affect does not impact semantic retrieval failure monitoring.
Can J Exp Psychol. 2015 Dec;69(4):314-26. doi: 10.1037/cep0000065. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
4
The Relationship Between Apraxia of Speech and Oral Apraxia: Association or Dissociation?
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2015 Nov;30(7):670-82. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acv051. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
5
Bridging computational approaches to speech production: The semantic-lexical-auditory-motor model (SLAM).
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Apr;23(2):339-52. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0903-7.
6
Primary progressive apraxia of speech: clinical features and acoustic and neurologic correlates.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015 May;24(2):88-100. doi: 10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0174.
7
Rethinking voxel-wise lesion-deficit analysis: a new challenge for computational neuropsychology.
Cortex. 2015 Mar;64:413-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.10.021. Epub 2014 Nov 12.
8
The Apraxia of Speech Rating Scale: a tool for diagnosis and description of apraxia of speech.
J Commun Disord. 2014 Sep-Oct;51:43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2014.06.008. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
9
Multivariate lesion-symptom mapping using support vector regression.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Dec;35(12):5861-76. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22590. Epub 2014 Jul 16.
10
Human brain lesion-deficit inference remapped.
Brain. 2014 Sep;137(Pt 9):2522-31. doi: 10.1093/brain/awu164. Epub 2014 Jun 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验