Suppr超能文献

急性医疗状况的非住院治疗替代策略:系统评价。

Alternative Strategies to Inpatient Hospitalization for Acute Medical Conditions: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston2Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts3Clinical Excellence Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California4Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.

Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.

出版信息

JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Nov 1;176(11):1693-1702. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.5974.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Determining innovative approaches that better align health needs to the appropriate setting of care remains a key priority for the transformation of US health care; however, to our knowledge, no comprehensive assessment exists of alternative management strategies to hospital admission for acute medical conditions.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effectiveness, safety, and cost of managing acute medical conditions in settings outside of a hospital inpatient unit.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (January 1995 to February 2016) were searched for English-language systematic reviews that evaluated alternative management strategies to hospital admission. Two investigators extracted data independently on trial design, eligibility criteria, clinical outcomes, patient experience, and health care costs. The quality of each review was assessed using the revised AMSTAR tool (R-AMSTAR) and the strength of evidence from primary studies was graded according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine.

FINDINGS

Twenty-five systematic reviews (representing 123 primary studies) met inclusion criteria. For outpatient management strategies, several acute medical conditions had no significant difference in mortality, disease-specific outcomes, or patient satisfaction compared with inpatient admission. For quick diagnostic units, the evidence was more limited but did demonstrate low mortality rates and high patient satisfaction. For hospital-at-home, a variety of acute medical conditions had mortality rates, disease-specific outcomes, and patient and caregiver satisfaction that were either improved or no different compared with inpatient admission. For observation units, several acute medical conditions were found to have no difference in mortality, a decreased length of stay, and improved patient satisfaction compared to inpatient admission; results for some conditions were more limited. Across all alternative management strategies, cost data were heterogeneous but showed near-universal savings when assessed.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

For low-risk patients with a range of acute medical conditions, evidence suggests that alternative management strategies to inpatient care can achieve comparable clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction at lower costs. Further study and application of such opportunities for health system redesign is warranted.

摘要

重要性

确定将医疗需求与适当的医疗保健环境更好地结合起来的创新方法仍然是美国医疗保健转型的关键重点;然而,据我们所知,对于急性医疗状况的除住院治疗以外的替代管理策略,尚无全面评估。

目的

研究在医院住院病房以外的环境中管理急性医疗状况的效果、安全性和成本。

证据回顾

在 1995 年 1 月至 2016 年 2 月期间,检索了 MEDLINE、Scopus、CINAHL 和 Cochrane 系统评价数据库(Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews),以获取评估除住院以外的替代管理策略的英文系统评价。两名调查人员独立提取关于试验设计、入选标准、临床结局、患者体验和医疗保健成本的数据。使用修订后的 AMSTAR 工具(R-AMSTAR)评估每个综述的质量,并根据牛津循证医学中心的标准对来自原始研究的证据强度进行分级。

结果

25 项系统评价(代表 123 项原始研究)符合纳入标准。对于门诊管理策略,几种急性医疗状况在死亡率、特定疾病结局或患者满意度方面与住院治疗没有显著差异。对于快速诊断单位,证据更为有限,但确实显示出较低的死亡率和较高的患者满意度。对于医院居家治疗,多种急性医疗状况的死亡率、特定疾病结局以及患者和护理人员的满意度与住院治疗相比要么得到改善,要么没有差异。对于观察病房,几种急性医疗状况在死亡率、住院时间缩短和患者满意度提高方面与住院治疗没有差异;某些情况下的结果则更为有限。在所有替代管理策略中,成本数据具有异质性,但评估结果显示几乎普遍节省成本。

结论和相关性

对于具有一系列急性医疗状况的低风险患者,有证据表明,除住院治疗以外的替代管理策略在降低成本的同时可以获得相当的临床结局和患者满意度。进一步研究和应用这种医疗体系重新设计的机会是必要的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验