• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

母体和胎儿特征影响妊娠日期推算方法之间的差异:一项基于人群的横断面登记研究。

Maternal and fetal characteristics affect discrepancies between pregnancy-dating methods: a population-based cross-sectional register study.

作者信息

Kullinger Merit, Wesström Jan, Kieler Helle, Skalkidou Alkistis

机构信息

Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Center for Clinical Research, Västmanland County Hospital, Västerås, Sweden.

出版信息

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017 Jan;96(1):86-95. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13034. Epub 2016 Nov 13.

DOI:10.1111/aogs.13034
PMID:27696340
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5213130/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Gestational age is estimated by ultrasound using fetal size as a proxy for age, although variance in early growth affects reliability. The aim of this study was to identify characteristics associated with discrepancies between last menstrual period-based (EDD-LMP) and ultrasound-based (EDD-US) estimated delivery dates.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We identified all singleton births (n = 1 201 679) recorded in the Swedish Medical Birth Register in 1995-2010, to assess the association between maternal/fetal characteristics and large negative and large positive discrepancies (EDD-LMP earlier than EDD-US and 10th percentile in the discrepancy distribution vs. EDD-LMP later than EDD-US and 90th percentile). Analyses were adjusted for age, parity, height, body mass index, smoking, and employment status.

RESULTS

Women with a body mass index >40 kg/m had the highest odds for large negative discrepancies (-9 to -20 days) [odds ratio (OR) 2.16, 95% CI 2.01-2.33]. Other factors associated with large negative discrepancies were: diabetes, young maternal age, multiparity, body mass index between 30 and 39.9 kg/m or <18.5 kg/m , a history of gestational diabetes, female fetus, shorter stature (<-1 SD), a history of preeclampsia, smoking or snuff use, and unemployment. Large positive discrepancies (+4 to +20 days) were associated with male fetus (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.77-1.83), age ≥30 years, multiparity, not living with a partner, taller stature (>+1 SD), and unemployment.

CONCLUSIONS

Several maternal and fetal characteristics were associated with discrepancies between dating methods. Systematic associations of discrepancies with maternal height, fetal sex, and partly obesity, may reflect an influence on the precision of the ultrasound estimate due to variance in early growth.

摘要

引言

尽管早期生长的差异会影响可靠性,但孕周是通过超声以胎儿大小作为年龄的替代指标来估算的。本研究的目的是确定与末次月经日期估算的预产期(EDD-LMP)和超声估算的预产期(EDD-US)之间差异相关的特征。

材料与方法

我们确定了1995年至2010年瑞典医学出生登记册中记录的所有单胎分娩(n = 1201679例),以评估母体/胎儿特征与大的负差异和大的正差异(EDD-LMP早于EDD-US且差异分布在第10百分位数以下与EDD-LMP晚于EDD-US且差异分布在第90百分位数以上)之间的关联。分析针对年龄、产次、身高、体重指数、吸烟和就业状况进行了校正。

结果

体重指数>40kg/m²的女性出现大的负差异(-9至-20天)的几率最高[比值比(OR)2.16,95%可信区间2.01-2.33]。与大的负差异相关的其他因素包括:糖尿病、年轻的产妇年龄、多产、体重指数在30至39.9kg/m²或<18.5kg/m²之间、妊娠期糖尿病史、女胎、身材较矮(<-1标准差)、子痫前期病史、吸烟或使用鼻烟以及失业。大的正差异(+4至+20天)与男胎(OR 1.80,95%可信区间1.77-1.83)、年龄≥30岁、多产、未与伴侣同住、身材较高(>+1标准差)和失业相关。

结论

几种母体和胎儿特征与预产期估算方法之间的差异相关。差异与母体身高、胎儿性别以及部分肥胖之间的系统性关联,可能反映了早期生长差异对超声估算精度的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acee/5213130/6f09832576b7/AOGS-96-86-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acee/5213130/6f09832576b7/AOGS-96-86-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acee/5213130/6f09832576b7/AOGS-96-86-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Maternal and fetal characteristics affect discrepancies between pregnancy-dating methods: a population-based cross-sectional register study.母体和胎儿特征影响妊娠日期推算方法之间的差异:一项基于人群的横断面登记研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017 Jan;96(1):86-95. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13034. Epub 2016 Nov 13.
2
Maternal obesity is a potential source of error in mid-trimester ultrasound estimation of gestational age.孕妇肥胖是中孕期超声估计胎龄的一个潜在误差源。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jan;35(1):48-53. doi: 10.1002/uog.7502.
3
Prospective population-based cohort study of maternal obesity as a source of error in gestational age estimation at 11-14 weeks.以人群为基础的前瞻性队列研究:将孕早期(11 - 14周)孕妇肥胖作为孕周估算误差的一个来源。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016 Nov;95(11):1281-1287. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12963.
4
Discrepancy between pregnancy dating methods affects obstetric and neonatal outcomes: a population-based register cohort study.妊娠(怀孕)日期评估方法的差异对产科和新生儿结局的影响:基于人群的注册队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2018 May 2;8(1):6936. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24894-y.
5
Do parental heights influence pregnancy length?: A population-based prospective study, HUNT 2.父母身高是否影响孕期长短?一项基于人群的前瞻性研究,HUNT2。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Feb 5;13:33. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-33.
6
Impact of maternal characteristics on fetal growth in the third trimester: a population-based study.母亲特征对孕晚期胎儿生长的影响:一项基于人群的研究。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Dec;40(6):680-7. doi: 10.1002/uog.11125.
7
Determinants and consequences of discrepancies in menstrual and ultrasonographic gestational age estimates.月经孕周与超声孕周估计差异的决定因素及后果
BJOG. 2005 Feb;112(2):145-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00311.x.
8
Early pregnancy predictors of preterm birth: the role of a prolonged menstruation-conception interval.早产的早期妊娠预测因素:月经周期与受孕间隔延长的作用。
BJOG. 2000 Feb;107(2):228-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11694.x.
9
Effects of gestational weight gain and body mass index on obstetric outcome in Sweden.瑞典孕期体重增加及体重指数对产科结局的影响。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006 Jun;93(3):269-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.03.002. Epub 2006 Apr 12.
10
Reliability of last menstrual period recall, an early ultrasound and a Smartphone App in predicting date of delivery and classification of preterm and post-term births.末次月经回忆、早期超声和智能手机应用程序预测分娩日期和早产及过期产分类的可靠性。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Jul 7;21(1):493. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03980-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Pregnancy planning and neonatal outcome - a retrospective cohort study.妊娠计划与新生儿结局——一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Mar 16;24(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06401-6.
2
Gestational age at term delivery and children's neurocognitive development.足月产时的胎龄与儿童神经认知发育。
Int J Epidemiol. 2022 Jan 6;50(6):1814-1823. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyab134. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
3
Preterm disparities between foreign and Swedish born mothers depend on the method used to estimate gestational age. A Swedish population-based register study.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk for girls can be adversely affected post-term due to underestimation of gestational age by ultrasound in the second trimester.由于孕中期超声对孕周的低估,孕晚期女孩面临的风险可能会受到不利影响。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015 Dec;94(12):1373-9. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12774. Epub 2015 Oct 13.
2
The importance of the cerebroplacental ratio in the evaluation of fetal well-being in SGA and AGA fetuses.脑胎盘比值在评估小于胎龄儿和适于胎龄儿胎儿健康状况中的重要性。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jul;213(1):5-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.024.
3
Risks associated with obesity in pregnancy, for the mother and baby: a systematic review of reviews.
出生时胎龄估计方法不同,外国母亲与瑞典本地母亲的早产儿比例存在差异:一项基于人群的瑞典注册研究
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 22;16(2):e0247138. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247138. eCollection 2021.
4
Swedish intrauterine growth reference ranges of biometric measurements of fetal head, abdomen and femur.瑞典胎儿头、腹和股骨生物测量的宫内生长参考范围。
Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 31;10(1):22441. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79797-8.
5
Adherence to Swedish national pregnancy dating guidelines and management of discrepancies between pregnancy dating methods: a survey study.遵循瑞典国家妊娠日期指南和处理妊娠日期方法差异:一项调查研究。
Reprod Health. 2019 Jul 4;16(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0760-3.
6
Methods of gestational age assessment influence the observed association between antiretroviral therapy exposure, preterm delivery, and small-for-gestational age infants: a prospective study in Cape Town, South Africa.方法的胎龄评估影响观察之间的关联抗逆转录病毒治疗暴露、早产和小于胎龄儿:一项前瞻性研究在开普敦,南非。
Ann Epidemiol. 2018 Dec;28(12):893-900. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.08.011. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
7
Discrepancy between pregnancy dating methods affects obstetric and neonatal outcomes: a population-based register cohort study.妊娠(怀孕)日期评估方法的差异对产科和新生儿结局的影响:基于人群的注册队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2018 May 2;8(1):6936. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24894-y.
孕期肥胖对母婴的相关风险:综述的系统评价
Obes Rev. 2015 Aug;16(8):621-38. doi: 10.1111/obr.12288. Epub 2015 May 28.
4
Internal validity of the Swedish Maternal Health Care Register.瑞典孕产妇保健登记册的内部效度
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Aug 30;14:364. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-364.
5
Sex bias in ultrasound measures of gestational age: assessment by sex ratio in post-term births.
Epidemiology. 2014 Jul;25(4):513-7. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000108.
6
Discrepancy in term calculation from second trimester ultrasound scan versus last menstrual period in women with type 1 diabetes.1型糖尿病女性孕中期超声扫描与末次月经计算孕周的差异。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014 Aug;93(8):809-16. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12422. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
7
Placental pathology in early-onset and late-onset fetal growth restriction.早发型和晚发型胎儿生长受限中的胎盘病理学
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2014;36(2):117-28. doi: 10.1159/000359969. Epub 2014 Feb 21.
8
Periconception maternal characteristics and embryonic growth trajectories: the Rotterdam Predict study.围孕期母亲特征与胚胎生长轨迹:鹿特丹预测研究。
Hum Reprod. 2013 Dec;28(12):3188-96. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det375. Epub 2013 Oct 8.
9
Maternal smoking during pregnancy and fetal biometry: the INMA Mother and Child Cohort Study.孕期母亲吸烟与胎儿生物测量:INMA 母婴队列研究。
Am J Epidemiol. 2013 Oct 1;178(7):1067-75. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwt085. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
10
Maternal and fetal factors which affect fetometry: use of in vitro fertilization and birth register data.影响胎儿测量的母体和胎儿因素:体外受精和出生登记数据的应用。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Oct;170(2):372-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.07.029. Epub 2013 Aug 6.