Institute of Estuarine & Coastal Studies (IECS), University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, UK.
The Law School, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, UK.
Mar Pollut Bull. 2016 Dec 15;113(1-2):25-35. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.06.074. Epub 2016 Oct 1.
Several environmental laws include provisions on natural causes or force majeure, which except States from their commitments if it can be proven that the failure to meet the commitment is due to factors outside their control. The European Union Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) has a pivotal role in managing EU marine waters. This paper analyses natural causes and force majeure provisions of the MFSD and other marine legislation, and addresses their interaction with climate change and its consequences, especially the effect on the obligation of ensuring seas are in Good Environmental Status. Climate change is an exogenic unmanaged pressure in that it emanates from outside the area being managed but in which the management authority has to respond to the consequences of climate change, such as sea level rise and temperature elevation, rather than its causes. It is suggested that a defence by a Member State of force majeure may be accepted if an event was proven to be due to an externality of control, irresistible and unforeseeable. The analysis contends that countering such a legal defence would centre on the fact that climate change is a well-accepted phenomenon, is foreseen with an accepted level of confidence and probability and is due to human actions. However, as yet, this has not been legally tested.
几项环境法包含有关自然原因或不可抗力的条款,如果能够证明未能履行承诺是由于其无法控制的因素造成的,则这些条款将免除国家的责任。《欧盟海洋战略框架指令》(MSFD)在管理欧盟海洋水域方面发挥着关键作用。本文分析了 MSFD 及其他海洋立法中的自然原因和不可抗力条款,并探讨了它们与气候变化及其后果的相互作用,特别是对确保海洋处于良好环境状况的义务的影响。气候变化是一种外生的不可管理的压力,因为它源自管理区域之外,但管理当局必须应对气候变化的后果,如海平面上升和温度升高,而不是其原因。如果能够证明某一事件是由于外部因素、不可抗力和不可预见的原因造成的,那么成员国可以接受不可抗力的抗辩。该分析认为,反驳这种法律抗辩的依据将是气候变化是一种公认的现象,其预见具有可接受的置信度和概率,并归因于人类活动。然而,到目前为止,这还没有在法律上得到检验。