AZTI-Tecnalia, Marine Research Division, Herrera Kaia, Portualdea s/n, 20110 Pasaia, Spain.
Mar Pollut Bull. 2010 Dec;60(12):2175-86. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.09.026. Epub 2010 Oct 20.
Through implementing environmental Directives, Europe has moved towards coordinated and integrated catchment-to-coast management, following the most novel legislation on ecosystem-based approaches worldwide. The novel joint synthesis of this direction reviewed here allows us to regard the Water Framework Directive (WFD) as a 'deconstructing structural approach' whereas the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) is a 'holistic functional approach', i.e. the WFD has split the ecosystem into several biological quality elements, then it compares the structure of these (such as species complement) individually before combining them and attempting to determine the overall condition. In contrast the MSFD concentrates on the set of 11 descriptors which together summarize the way in which the whole system functions. We emphasize that both Directives are frameworks on which many other directives are linked but that they need to be fully and seamlessly integrated to give a land to open sea system of assessment and management. Hence, by taking account of the experience gained in the WFD implementation, together with that from regional sea conventions, such as OSPAR (North East Atlantic) or HELCOM (Baltic Sea), we propose in this contribution an integrative approach for the environmental status assessment, within the MSFD.
通过实施环境指令,欧洲已经朝着协调和综合的集水区到沿海管理方向发展,遵循了全球最新的基于生态系统方法的立法。这里回顾的这一方向的新颖综合允许我们将水框架指令 (WFD) 视为“解构结构方法”,而海洋战略框架指令 (MSFD) 是一种“整体功能方法”,即 WFD 将生态系统分解为几个生物质量要素,然后在将它们组合在一起并试图确定整体状况之前,单独比较这些要素的结构(例如物种补充)。相比之下,MSFD 集中于 11 个描述符,这些描述符共同总结了整个系统的功能方式。我们强调,这两个指令都是许多其他指令所关联的框架,但它们需要充分而无缝地整合,以提供一个从陆地到开阔海域的评估和管理系统。因此,考虑到在 WFD 实施过程中获得的经验,以及 OSPAR(东北大西洋)或 HELCOM(波罗的海)等区域海洋公约的经验,我们在本贡献中提出了一种综合方法,用于 MSFD 中的环境状况评估。