Agroécologie, AgroSup Dijon, INRA, Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Dijon, France.
University of Thessaly, Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Ploutonos 26 and Aiolou, 41221 Larissa, Greece.
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Jan 1;575:1027-1033. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.167. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
This opinion article aims to foster the debate about pesticide legislation in the European Union (EU). Numerous formerly authorized and widely used pesticides are now banned in the EU because unexpected and unacceptable risks emerged after their initial introduction to the market. Throughout this time lapse, environmental quality and human health have been threatened by the use of these compounds. These hazards could have been prevented by a more responsive pesticide regulatory framework. This article provides detailed insights into the pros and cons of pesticides, and points out weaknesses of the current pesticide environmental risk assessment procedures. Possibilities for improving the robustness and reliability of the pesticide regulatory framework are discussed.
这篇观点文章旨在推动欧盟(EU)内关于农药立法的辩论。由于最初引入市场后出现了意想不到和不可接受的风险,许多以前授权和广泛使用的农药现已在欧盟被禁用。在此期间,环境质量和人类健康受到这些化合物使用的威胁。如果采用更具响应性的农药监管框架,本可以预防这些危害。本文详细探讨了农药的利弊,并指出了当前农药环境风险评估程序的弱点。讨论了提高农药监管框架稳健性和可靠性的可能性。