Lamichhane Jay Ram, Dachbrodt-Saaydeh Silke, Kudsk Per, Messéan Antoine
INRA, UAR 1240 Eco-Innov, BP 01, 78850 Thiverval-Grignon, France.
Julius Kühn-Institut, Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Stahnsdorfer Damm 81, 14532 Kleinmachnow, Germany.
Plant Dis. 2016 Jan;100(1):10-24. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-05-15-0574-FE. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
Whether modern agriculture without conventional pesticides will be possible or not is a matter of debate. The debate is meaningful within the context of rising health and environmental awareness on one hand, and the global challenge of feeding a steadily growing human population on the other. Conventional pesticide use has come under pressure in many countries, and some European Union (EU) Member States have adopted policies for risk reduction following Directive 2009/128/EC, the sustainable use of pesticides. Highly diverse crop production systems across Europe, having varied geographic and climatic conditions, increase the complexity of European crop protection. The economic competitiveness of European agriculture is challenged by the current legislation, which banned the use of many previously authorized pesticides that are still available and applied in other parts of the world. This challenge could place EU agricultural production at a disadvantage, so EU farmers are seeking help from the research community to foster and support integrated pest management (IPM). Ensuring stable crop yields and quality while reducing the reliance on pesticides is a challenge facing the farming community is today. Considering this, we focus on several diverse situations in European agriculture in general and in European crop protection in particular. We emphasize that the marked biophysical and socio-economic differences across Europe have led to a situation where a meaningful reduction in pesticide use can hardly be achieved. Nevertheless, improvements and/or adoption of the knowledge and technologies of IPM can still achieve large gains in pesticide reduction. In this overview, the current pest problems and their integrated management are discussed in the context of specific geographic regions of Europe, with a particular emphasis on reduced pesticide use. We conclude that there are opportunities for reduction in many parts of Europe without significant losses in crop yields.
没有传统农药的现代农业是否可行是一个有争议的问题。一方面,在健康和环境意识不断提高的背景下,另一方面在全球养活不断增长的人口这一挑战的背景下,这场辩论是有意义的。在许多国家,传统农药的使用面临压力,一些欧盟成员国已根据关于农药可持续使用的第2009/128/EC号指令采取了风险降低政策。欧洲各地高度多样化的作物生产系统,地理和气候条件各不相同,增加了欧洲作物保护的复杂性。欧洲农业的经济竞争力受到现行立法的挑战,该立法禁止使用许多以前授权的农药,而这些农药在世界其他地区仍然可用并在使用。这一挑战可能使欧盟农业生产处于不利地位,因此欧盟农民正在寻求研究界的帮助,以促进和支持综合虫害管理(IPM)。在减少对农药依赖的同时确保稳定的作物产量和质量是当今农业社区面临的一项挑战。考虑到这一点,我们总体上关注欧洲农业中的几种不同情况,特别是欧洲作物保护中的情况。我们强调,欧洲各地明显的生物物理和社会经济差异导致了一种情况,即很难实现农药使用的大幅减少。然而,改进和/或采用综合虫害管理的知识和技术仍可在减少农药使用方面取得巨大成效。在本综述中,在欧洲特定地理区域的背景下讨论了当前的害虫问题及其综合管理,特别强调减少农药使用。我们得出结论,欧洲许多地区都有减少农药使用的机会,而不会导致作物产量大幅损失。