• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在共享平等准入区域癌症医院队列中,根治性前列腺切除术后顶端阳性手术切缘的长期肿瘤学结果。

Long-term oncological outcomes of apical positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy in the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital cohort.

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

Section of Urology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Augusta, GA, USA.

出版信息

Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2016 Dec;19(4):423-428. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2016.45. Epub 2016 Oct 4.

DOI:10.1038/pcan.2016.45
PMID:27698440
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Approximately 29-38% of all positive surgical margins (PSMs) at radical prostatectomy (RP) involve the apex. The prognostic significance of apical PSM remains unclear. We therefore compared the long-term oncologic outcomes of men with apical PSMs to those with negative PSMs, apical and other PSMs, and other PSMs at RP.

METHODS

The SEARCH (Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital) database was used to identify 4031 men with prostate cancer (PCa) managed with RP with complete pathologic grade and stage data. Margin status was categorized as negative, apex only, or other positive. Multivariable Cox regression models adjusted for pathologic stage and grade were developed to test the relationship between margin status and biochemical recurrence (BCR), metastases and PCa death.

RESULTS

In the final cohort, 34.3% had PSMs, whereas 65.7% had negative margins. Univariable analysis showed that compared with negative margins, apex-only PSM was associated with BCR (hazard ratio (HR): 1.4 [1.1-1.8]), but not metastases or PCa death, whereas apex and other PSMs were associated with BCR (HR: 3.3 [2.8-4]) and metastases (HR: 1.8 [1.02-3.1]) but not PCa death. Nonapical PSMs were associated with BCR (HR: 2.7 [2.4-3.1]), metastases (1.7 [1.2-2.5)] and PCa death (1.8 [1.05-3]). On multivariable analysis, apex-only, apex and other, and nonapical PSMs were associated with BCR but margin status was not associated with metastases or PCa death.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large cohort of men undergoing RP, those with PSMs at the prostatic apex had lower BCR, metastases, or PCa death compared with those with PSMs at other locations. When adjusted for pathologic stage and grade, however, PSMs were associated with BCR but not long-term oncologic outcomes. These data confirm that men with apex-only PSMs may not be ideal candidates for adjuvant therapy after RP.

摘要

背景

根治性前列腺切除术(RP)中约有 29-38%的阳性切缘(PSM)累及尖端。尖端 PSM 的预后意义尚不清楚。因此,我们比较了 RP 中尖端 PSM 与阴性 PSM、尖端和其他 PSM 以及其他 PSM 的长期肿瘤学结果。

方法

使用 SEARCH(共享平等获取区域癌症医院)数据库确定了 4031 名接受 RP 治疗且具有完整病理分级和分期数据的前列腺癌(PCa)男性。切缘状态分为阴性、仅尖端或其他阳性。开发多变量 Cox 回归模型以测试切缘状态与生化复发(BCR)、转移和 PCa 死亡之间的关系。

结果

在最终队列中,34.3%有 PSM,65.7%有阴性切缘。单变量分析表明,与阴性切缘相比,仅尖端 PSM 与 BCR 相关(危险比 (HR):1.4 [1.1-1.8]),但与转移或 PCa 死亡无关,而尖端和其他 PSM 与 BCR(HR:3.3 [2.8-4])和转移(HR:1.8 [1.02-3.1])相关,但与 PCa 死亡无关。非尖端 PSM 与 BCR(HR:2.7 [2.4-3.1])、转移(1.7 [1.2-2.5])和 PCa 死亡(1.8 [1.05-3])相关。多变量分析显示,仅尖端、尖端和其他、非尖端 PSM 与 BCR 相关,但切缘状态与转移或 PCa 死亡无关。

结论

在接受 RP 的大量男性患者中,与位于其他部位的 PSM 相比,前列腺尖端有 PSM 的患者的 BCR、转移或 PCa 死亡较低。然而,在调整病理分期和分级后,PSM 与 BCR 相关,但与长期肿瘤学结果无关。这些数据证实,仅尖端 PSM 的男性可能不是 RP 后辅助治疗的理想人选。

相似文献

1
Long-term oncological outcomes of apical positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy in the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital cohort.在共享平等准入区域癌症医院队列中,根治性前列腺切除术后顶端阳性手术切缘的长期肿瘤学结果。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2016 Dec;19(4):423-428. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2016.45. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
2
Positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy patients do not predict long-term oncological outcomes: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) cohort.根治性前列腺切除术患者的手术切缘阳性并不能预测长期肿瘤学结局:共享平等准入区域癌症医院(SEARCH)队列研究结果
BJU Int. 2016 Feb;117(2):244-8. doi: 10.1111/bju.13181. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
3
Impact of Multifocality and Multilocation of Positive Surgical Margin After Radical Prostatectomy on Predicting Oncological Outcome.根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性的多灶性和多部位对预测肿瘤学结局的影响。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019 Feb;17(1):e44-e52. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.08.007. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
4
Radical prostatectomy and the effect of close surgical margins: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database.根治性前列腺切除术和接近手术切缘的影响:来自共享平等获得区域癌症医院(SEARCH)数据库的结果。
BJU Int. 2018 Oct;122(4):592-598. doi: 10.1111/bju.14178. Epub 2018 Mar 25.
5
Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.辅助治疗初治患者根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性对前列腺特异抗原失败的影响。
BJU Int. 2011 Jun;107(11):1748-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09728.x. Epub 2010 Sep 30.
6
Impact of positive surgical margin length and Gleason grade at the margin on biochemical recurrence in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.切缘阳性长度和边缘处 Gleason 分级对局限期前列腺癌患者生化复发的影响。
Prostate. 2019 Dec;79(16):1832-1836. doi: 10.1002/pros.23908. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
7
The impact of solitary and multiple positive surgical margins on hard clinical end points in 1712 adjuvant treatment-naive pT2-4 N0 radical prostatectomy patients.在 1712 例辅助治疗初治 pT2-4N0 根治性前列腺切除术患者中,单一和多个阳性手术切缘对硬临床终点的影响。
Eur Urol. 2013 Jul;64(1):19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.08.002. Epub 2012 Aug 10.
8
Defining Clinically Meaningful Positive Surgical Margins in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy for Localised Prostate Cancer.定义接受根治性前列腺切除术的局限性前列腺癌患者的临床有意义的阳性切缘。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2021 Feb;4(1):42-48. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.03.006. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
9
Risk of biochemical recurrence based on extent and location of positive surgical margins after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.基于机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后阳性手术切缘的范围和位置的生化复发风险。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Dec 27;18(1):1291. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-5229-1.
10
Prostate carcinoma with positive margins at radical prostatectomy: role of tumour zonal origin in biochemical recurrence.根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性的前列腺癌:肿瘤区域起源在生化复发中的作用
BJU Int. 2015 Oct;116 Suppl 3:42-8. doi: 10.1111/bju.13173. Epub 2015 Jul 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-based Prostate Specific Antigen Density and PI-RADSv2 score help identify Apical Prostate Cancer.基于多参数磁共振成像的前列腺特异性抗原密度和PI-RADS v2评分有助于识别前列腺尖部癌。
J Cancer. 2023 May 15;14(8):1371-1380. doi: 10.7150/jca.84278. eCollection 2023.
2
The Effect of Adverse Surgical Margins on the Risk of Biochemical Recurrence after Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.不良手术切缘对机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发风险的影响。
Biomedicines. 2022 Aug 7;10(8):1911. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10081911.
3
Diagnostic potential of radiological apical tumor involvement.

本文引用的文献

1
Positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy patients do not predict long-term oncological outcomes: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) cohort.根治性前列腺切除术患者的手术切缘阳性并不能预测长期肿瘤学结局:共享平等准入区域癌症医院(SEARCH)队列研究结果
BJU Int. 2016 Feb;117(2):244-8. doi: 10.1111/bju.13181. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
2
Adjuvant radiotherapy versus wait-and-see after radical prostatectomy: 10-year follow-up of the ARO 96-02/AUO AP 09/95 trial.根治性前列腺切除术术后辅助放疗与观察等待的比较:ARO 96-02/AUO AP 09/95 试验的 10 年随访结果。
Eur Urol. 2014 Aug;66(2):243-50. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.03.011. Epub 2014 Mar 21.
3
影像学根尖肿瘤累及的诊断潜能。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Apr;17(2):705-706. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01413-w. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
4
Unrecognized Pitfall When Doing Nerve-Sparing Surgery in Radical Prostatectomy.根治性前列腺切除术中实施保留神经手术时未被认识到的陷阱。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Sep;28(9):4775-4776. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10282-w. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
5
Obesity, risk of biochemical recurrence, and prostate-specific antigen doubling time after radical prostatectomy: results from the SEARCH database.肥胖与前列腺癌根治术后生化复发风险及前列腺特异抗原倍增时间的关系:来自 SEARCH 数据库的研究结果。
BJU Int. 2019 Jul;124(1):69-75. doi: 10.1111/bju.14594. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
6
Timing of Prostate-specific Antigen Nadir After Radical Prostatectomy and Risk of Biochemical Recurrence.根治性前列腺切除术后前列腺特异性抗原最低点出现时间与生化复发风险
Urology. 2017 Oct;108:129-134. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.07.009. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
7
Validation of the 2015 prostate cancer grade groups for predicting long-term oncologic outcomes in a shared equal-access health system.2015年前列腺癌分级组在共享平等获取医疗系统中预测长期肿瘤学结局的验证
Cancer. 2017 Nov 1;123(21):4122-4129. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30844. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
Non-apical positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy for pT2 prostate cancer is associated with the highest risk of recurrence.
根治性前列腺切除术后非尖部阳性手术切缘与前列腺癌 pT2 复发风险最高相关。
J Surg Oncol. 2014 Jun;109(8):818-22. doi: 10.1002/jso.23573. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
4
Location, extent, and multifocality of positive surgical margins for biochemical recurrence prediction after radical prostatectomy.根治性前列腺切除术后用于生化复发预测的阳性手术切缘的位置、范围和多灶性。
World J Urol. 2014 Dec;32(6):1393-400. doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1243-3. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
5
Impact of positive surgical margins and their locations after radical prostatectomy: comparison of biochemical recurrence according to risk stratification and surgical modality.根治性前列腺切除术后阳性手术切缘及其位置的影响:根据风险分层和手术方式比较生化复发情况。
World J Urol. 2014 Dec;32(6):1401-9. doi: 10.1007/s00345-013-1230-0. Epub 2013 Dec 21.
6
Positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy: Population-based averages within PSA and Gleason strata.根治性前列腺切除术中的阳性手术切缘:基于人群的前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)和 Gleason 分级分层平均值。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2013 Sep-Oct;7(9-10):E561-6. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.315.
7
Do margins matter? The influence of positive surgical margins on prostate cancer-specific mortality.切缘阳性是否有影响?切缘阳性对前列腺癌特异性死亡率的影响。
Eur Urol. 2014 Apr;65(4):675-80. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.08.036. Epub 2013 Aug 27.
8
Long-term impact of positive surgical margins on biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: ten years of follow-up.根治性前列腺切除术后手术切缘阳性对生化复发的长期影响:十年随访
Scand J Urol. 2014 Apr;48(2):131-7. doi: 10.3109/21681805.2013.813067. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
9
Adjuvant and salvage radiotherapy after prostatectomy: AUA/ASTRO Guideline.前列腺切除术的辅助和挽救性放疗:AUA/ASTRO 指南。
J Urol. 2013 Aug;190(2):441-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.05.032. Epub 2013 May 21.
10
Cancer statistics, 2013.癌症统计数据,2013 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2013 Jan;63(1):11-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21166. Epub 2013 Jan 17.