Pan Tiffany J, White Richard J, Zhang Caiyan, Hagberg William C, Imbriglia Joseph E, Fowler John R
University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Hand & UpperEx Center, Wexford, PA, USA.
Hand (N Y). 2016 Sep;11(3):353-356. doi: 10.1177/1558944715620799. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
Previous studies using ultrasound for diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome have reported on relatively small series of patients, leading to large standard deviations and/or confidence intervals for the mean cross-sectional area of the median nerve. The purpose of this study is to define the CSA of the median nerve in a large cohort of patients. Patients (n = 175) without history of carpal tunnel release were recruited. All participants were evaluated using the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome-6 questionnaire, a validated clinical diagnostic tool, with a score of 12 or greater considered positive for CTS. Ultrasound examination was performed on both wrists of all participants using a 13-6 MHz linear array transducer. The mean median nerve CSA was significantly larger (P < .001) for patients with a positive (mean = 11.16, SD = 2.51) versus negative CTS-6 result (mean = 6.91, SD = 2.06). There was a significant correlation (.527, P < .001, n = 349) between CSA and CTS-6 score. Logistic regression analysis determined that a CSA of 10 mm2 optimized sensitivity and specificity at 80% and 88%, respectively. Accuracy was 87.9%. A significant difference in mean CSA was found between patients with and without CTS. Median nerve CSA showed a statistically significant positive correlation with CTS-6. Similar to prior studies, a CSA of 10 mm2 was determined to be the optimal cutoff. In this large series of patients, ultrasound was a sensitive, specific, and accurate test for confirmation of a clinical diagnosis of CTS.
以往使用超声诊断腕管综合征的研究报道的患者系列相对较小,导致正中神经平均横截面积的标准差和/或置信区间较大。本研究的目的是确定一大群患者正中神经的横截面积。招募了无腕管松解术病史的患者(n = 175)。所有参与者均使用腕管综合征-6问卷进行评估,这是一种经过验证的临床诊断工具,CTS评分为12分或更高被视为阳性。使用13-6 MHz线性阵列换能器对所有参与者的双腕进行超声检查。CTS-6结果为阳性(平均值 = 11.16,标准差 = 2.51)的患者与阴性患者(平均值 = 6.91,标准差 = 2.06)相比,正中神经平均横截面积显著更大(P <.001)。横截面积与CTS-6评分之间存在显著相关性(.527,P <.001,n = 349)。逻辑回归分析确定,横截面积为10 mm²时,敏感性和特异性分别优化为80%和88%。准确率为87.9%。在患有和未患有CTS的患者之间发现平均横截面积存在显著差异。正中神经横截面积与CTS-6呈统计学显著正相关。与先前的研究相似,确定10 mm²的横截面积为最佳临界值。在这一大系列患者中,超声是一种用于确认CTS临床诊断的敏感、特异且准确的检查方法。