• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

约会暴力与同居暴力的风险因素:来自剑桥青少年犯罪发展研究第三代的结果。

Risk factors for dating violence versus cohabiting violence: Results from the third generation of the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development.

作者信息

Theobald Delphine, Farrington David P, Ttofi Maria M, Crago Rebecca V

机构信息

Kingston University, London, KT1 2EE, UK.

Institute of Criminology, Cambridge University, Cambridge, CB2 1TN, UK.

出版信息

Crim Behav Ment Health. 2016 Oct;26(4):229-239. doi: 10.1002/cbm.2017.

DOI:10.1002/cbm.2017
PMID:27709744
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dating violence is an important problem. Evidence suggests that women are more likely to perpetrate dating violence.

AIMS

The present study investigates the prevalence of dating violence compared with cohabiting violence in a community sample of men and women and assesses to what extent child and adolescent explanatory factors predict this behaviour. A secondary aim is to construct a risk score for dating violence based on the strongest risk factors.

METHODS

The Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development is a prospective longitudinal survey of 411 men (generation 2) born in the 1950s in an inner London area. Most recently, their sons and daughters [generation 3 (G3)] have been interviewed regarding their perpetration of dating and cohabiting violence, utilising the Conflict Tactics Scale. Risk factors were measured in four domains (family, parental, socio-economic and individual).

RESULTS

A larger proportion of women than men perpetrated at least one act of violence towards their dating partner (36.4 vs 21.7%). There was a similar pattern for cohabiting violence (39.6 vs 21.4%). A number of risk factors were significantly associated with the perpetration of dating violence. For G3 women, these included a convicted father, parental conflict, large family size and poor housing. For G3 men, these included having a young father or mother, separation from the father before age 16, early school leaving, frequent truancy and having a criminal conviction. A risk score for both men and women, based on 10 risk factors, significantly predicted dating violence.

CONCLUSION

Risk factors from four domains were important in predicting dating violence, but they were different for G3 men and women. It may be important to consider different risk factors and different risk assessments for male compared with female perpetration of dating violence. Early identification and interventions are recommended. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

摘要

背景

约会暴力是一个重要问题。有证据表明女性实施约会暴力的可能性更大。

目的

本研究调查了社区中男性和女性样本中约会暴力与同居暴力的发生率,并评估儿童和青少年解释性因素在多大程度上可预测这种行为。第二个目的是根据最强的风险因素构建约会暴力风险评分。

方法

“剑桥青少年犯罪发展研究”是一项对20世纪50年代出生于伦敦市中心地区的411名男性(第二代)进行的前瞻性纵向调查。最近,他们的子女[第三代(G3)]接受了关于他们实施约会暴力和同居暴力情况的访谈,采用的是冲突策略量表。风险因素在四个领域(家庭、父母、社会经济和个人)进行了测量。

结果

实施过至少一次针对约会伴侣暴力行为的女性比例高于男性(36.4%对21.7%)。同居暴力情况也有类似模式(39.6%对21.4%)。一些风险因素与约会暴力的实施显著相关。对于G3女性,这些因素包括父亲有犯罪记录、父母冲突、家庭规模大以及住房条件差。对于G3男性,这些因素包括父母一方年龄小、16岁前与父亲分离、过早辍学、经常逃学以及有犯罪记录。基于10个风险因素的男性和女性风险评分均能显著预测约会暴力。

结论

四个领域中的风险因素在预测约会暴力方面很重要,但G3男性和女性的风险因素不同。对于男性和女性实施约会暴力的情况,考虑不同的风险因素和不同的风险评估可能很重要。建议尽早识别并进行干预。版权所有© 2016约翰·威利父子有限公司。

相似文献

1
Risk factors for dating violence versus cohabiting violence: Results from the third generation of the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development.约会暴力与同居暴力的风险因素:来自剑桥青少年犯罪发展研究第三代的结果。
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2016 Oct;26(4):229-239. doi: 10.1002/cbm.2017.
2
Child and adolescent predictors of male intimate partner violence.儿童和青少年对男性亲密伴侣暴力的预测因素。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2012 Dec;53(12):1242-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02577.x. Epub 2012 Jul 4.
3
Effects of child abuse, adolescent violence, peer approval and pro-violence attitudes on intimate partner violence in adulthood.儿童期虐待、青少年暴力、同伴认可及支持暴力态度对成年后亲密伴侣暴力行为的影响。
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2016 Oct;26(4):304-314. doi: 10.1002/cbm.2014.
4
Risk assessments for dating violence in mid to late adolescence and early adulthood.青少年中后期及成年早期约会暴力的风险评估。
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2016 Oct;26(4):278-292. doi: 10.1002/cbm.2013.
5
Factors associated with physical or sexual intimate partner violence perpetration by men attending substance misuse treatment in Catalunya: A mixed methods study.加泰罗尼亚接受药物滥用治疗的男性实施身体或性亲密伴侣暴力的相关因素:一项混合方法研究。
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2015 Dec 10;25(4):239-57. doi: 10.1002/cbm.1958. Epub 2015 May 5.
6
Severe partner perpetrated burn: Examining a nationally representative sample of women in India.伴侣严重烧伤:对印度全国代表性女性样本的研究。
Burns. 2015 Dec;41(8):1847-1854. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2015.08.035. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
7
Mental ill health and factors associated with men's use of intimate partner violence in Zimbabwe.津巴布韦男性心理健康状况不佳及其与亲密伴侣暴力使用相关的因素。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Mar 20;18(1):376. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5272-5.
8
Exposure to Spousal Violence in the Family, Attitudes and Dating Violence Perpetration Among High School Students in Port-au-Prince.太子港高中生家庭中遭受配偶暴力的经历、态度及约会暴力实施情况
J Interpers Violence. 2016 Sep;31(14):2445-74. doi: 10.1177/0886260515576971. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
9
Prevalence and Correlates of the Perpetration of Cyber Dating Abuse among Early Adolescents.青少年早期网络约会虐待行为的发生率及其相关因素
J Youth Adolesc. 2017 Feb;46(2):358-375. doi: 10.1007/s10964-016-0568-1. Epub 2016 Sep 24.
10
From early dating violence to adult intimate partner violence: Continuity and sources of resilience in adulthood.从早期约会暴力到成年亲密伴侣暴力:成年期复原力的连续性与来源
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2016 Oct;26(4):293-303. doi: 10.1002/cbm.2012.

引用本文的文献

1
Categories of Intimate Partner Violence and Abuse Among Young Women and Men: Latent Class Analysis of Psychological, Physical, and Sexual Victimization and Perpetration in a UK Birth Cohort.年轻女性和男性的亲密伴侣暴力和虐待类别:英国出生队列中心理、身体和性受害与施害的潜在类别分析。
J Interpers Violence. 2023 Jan;38(1-2):NP931-NP954. doi: 10.1177/08862605221087708. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
2
Intergenerational Continuity of Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration: An Investigation of Possible Mechanisms.代际亲密伴侣暴力延续:可能机制的调查。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Apr;37(7-8):NP5208-NP5227. doi: 10.1177/0886260520959629. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
3
Moral Disengagement as a Moderating Factor in the Relationship between the Perception of Dating Violence and Victimization.
道德脱离在感知约会暴力与受害关系中的调节作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 17;17(14):5164. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17145164.