• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

西方国家脓毒症的流行病学趋势。

Epidemiologic trends of sepsis in western countries.

作者信息

Suarez De La Rica Alejandro, Gilsanz Fernando, Maseda Emilio

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Surgical Critical Care, Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Ann Transl Med. 2016 Sep;4(17):325. doi: 10.21037/atm.2016.08.59.

DOI:10.21037/atm.2016.08.59
PMID:27713883
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5050194/
Abstract

Since the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) and the Society of Critical care Medicine (SCCM) published the first consensus definition of syndromes related to sepsis in 1992, the knowledge of epidemiology of sepsis has clearly improved, although no prospective studies have been performed to analyse the incidence of sepsis in general population. There are differences in epidemiologic trends in sepsis between western countries and low-income and middle-income countries. In the United States (US), most of epidemiologic studies have been based on large, administrative databases, reporting an increase in the incidence of severe sepsis over years. In general, studies describing epidemiology of sepsis outside the US use clinical definitions and intensive care unit (ICU) observational cohort designs instead of administrative databases and definitions. Incidence of sepsis has increased over years, probably due to progressive aging of population, the existence of more comorbidities and maybe the liberal use of sepsis codification, by including patients with less severity. Notwithstanding, mortality due to sepsis is clearly decreasing over years, probably to improvement in ICU care, although absolute mortality is growing on account of the raise in incidence. Risk factors for sepsis are the two ends of life, male sex, US black race, presence of comorbidities and certain genetic variants. Respiratory tract infections are the most common source of sepsis, and, nowadays, Gram-positive infections are more frequent that Gram-negative sepsis in most prospective studies.

摘要

自美国胸科医师学会(ACCP)和危重病医学会(SCCM)于1992年首次发表脓毒症相关综合征的共识定义以来,脓毒症的流行病学知识虽有显著进步,但尚无前瞻性研究对普通人群中脓毒症的发病率进行分析。西方国家与低收入和中等收入国家在脓毒症的流行病学趋势上存在差异。在美国,大多数流行病学研究基于大型管理数据库,报告显示多年来严重脓毒症的发病率呈上升趋势。总体而言,美国以外描述脓毒症流行病学的研究采用临床定义和重症监护病房(ICU)观察性队列设计,而非管理数据库和定义。脓毒症的发病率多年来有所上升,这可能是由于人口老龄化加剧、合并症增多,或许还包括对脓毒症编码的宽松使用,即将病情较轻的患者纳入其中。尽管如此,脓毒症导致的死亡率多年来明显下降,这可能归因于ICU护理的改善,不过由于发病率上升,绝对死亡人数仍在增加。脓毒症的危险因素包括生命两端、男性、美国黑人种族、合并症的存在以及某些基因变异。呼吸道感染是脓毒症最常见的来源,如今,在大多数前瞻性研究中,革兰氏阳性菌感染比革兰氏阴性菌脓毒症更为常见。

相似文献

1
Epidemiologic trends of sepsis in western countries.西方国家脓毒症的流行病学趋势。
Ann Transl Med. 2016 Sep;4(17):325. doi: 10.21037/atm.2016.08.59.
2
Sepsis Care Pathway 2019.2019年脓毒症护理路径
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):4. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.4. eCollection 2019.
3
Epidemiology of sepsis: an update.脓毒症流行病学:最新进展
Crit Care Med. 2001 Jul;29(7 Suppl):S109-16. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200107001-00035.
4
Comparative effectiveness of physician diagnosis and guideline definitions in identifying sepsis patients in the emergency department.在急诊科中,医生诊断与指南定义在识别脓毒症患者方面的比较效果。
J Crit Care. 2015 Feb;30(1):71-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.08.009. Epub 2014 Aug 22.
5
Sepsis-3 definitions predict ICU mortality in a low-middle-income country.脓毒症-3定义可预测中低收入国家重症监护病房的死亡率。
Ann Intensive Care. 2016 Dec;6(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s13613-016-0204-y. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
6
2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference.2001年危重病医学会/欧洲重症监护医学学会/美国胸科医师学会/美国胸科学会/危重病医学学会国际脓毒症定义会议。
Intensive Care Med. 2003 Apr;29(4):530-8. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-1662-x. Epub 2003 Mar 28.
7
An evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of the 1991 American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine and the 2001 Society of Critical Care Medicine/European Society of Intensive Care Medicine/American College of Chest Physicians/American Thoracic Society/Surgical Infection Society sepsis definition.1991 年美国胸科医师学会/危重病医学会和 2001 年危重病医学会/欧洲危重病医学学会/美国胸科医师学会/美国胸科学会/外科感染学会脓毒症定义的诊断准确性评估。
Crit Care Med. 2012 Jun;40(6):1700-6. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318246b83a.
8
Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine.脓毒症与器官衰竭的定义以及脓毒症创新疗法的使用指南。ACCP/SCCM共识会议委员会。美国胸科医师学会/危重病医学会。
Chest. 1992 Jun;101(6):1644-55. doi: 10.1378/chest.101.6.1644.
9
The influence of a change in septic shock definitions on intensive care epidemiology and outcome: comparison of sepsis-2 and sepsis-3 definitions.脓毒症休克定义的改变对重症监护流行病学和结局的影响:脓毒症 2 期和脓毒症 3 期定义的比较。
Infect Dis (Lond). 2018 Mar;50(3):207-213. doi: 10.1080/23744235.2017.1383630. Epub 2017 Sep 26.
10
American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference definitions of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome and allied disorders in relation to critically injured patients.美国胸科医师学会/危重病医学会关于严重创伤患者的全身炎症反应综合征及相关病症的共识会议定义
Crit Care Med. 1997 Nov;25(11):1789-95. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199711000-00014.

引用本文的文献

1
The Prognostic Utility of Pathophysiologically Distinct Biomarkers for Renal Outcomes in Sepsis: A Prospective ICU Cohort Study.脓毒症中病理生理特征不同的生物标志物对肾脏预后的预测价值:一项前瞻性重症监护病房队列研究
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 30;14(15):5370. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155370.
2
Development and validation of a predictive model for invasive ventilation risk within 48 hours of admission in patients with early sepsis-associated acute kidney injury.早期脓毒症相关性急性肾损伤患者入院48小时内有创通气风险预测模型的开发与验证
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 18;12:1577154. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1577154. eCollection 2025.
3
Impact of Venous CONgestion on Organ Function and Outcomes in Sepsis (ICON-Sepsis): a prospective observational cohort study protocol.静脉淤血对脓毒症器官功能及预后的影响(ICON-脓毒症):一项前瞻性观察性队列研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 8;15(6):e098987. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-098987.
4
Accuracy of the modified Global Burden of Disease International Classification of Diseases coding methods for identifying sepsis: a prospective multicentre cohort study.用于识别脓毒症的改良全球疾病负担国际疾病分类编码方法的准确性:一项前瞻性多中心队列研究
Crit Care. 2025 Jun 2;29(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05448-x.
5
Sepsis in Internal Medicine: blood culture-based subtypes, hospital outcomes, and predictive biomarkers.内科脓毒症:基于血培养的亚型、医院结局及预测生物标志物
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jan 30;12:1503868. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1503868. eCollection 2025.
6
Nutritional Strategies for the Treatment and Prevention of Sepsis Outside the Intensive Care Unit.重症监护室外脓毒症治疗与预防的营养策略
Nutrients. 2024 Nov 21;16(23):3985. doi: 10.3390/nu16233985.
7
A novel nomogram to predict the risk of requiring mechanical ventilation in patients with sepsis within 48 hours of admission: a retrospective analysis.一种预测脓毒症患者入院后 48 小时内需要机械通气风险的新列线图:一项回顾性分析。
PeerJ. 2024 Nov 1;12:e18500. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18500. eCollection 2024.
8
The Utility of C-Reactive Protein, Procalcitonin, and Leukocyte Values in Predicting the Prognosis of Patients with Pneumosepsis and Septic Shock.C 反应蛋白、降钙素原和白细胞值在预测患有脓毒症性肺炎和感染性休克患者预后中的作用。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Sep 24;60(10):1560. doi: 10.3390/medicina60101560.
9
The molecular landscape of sepsis severity in infants: enhanced coagulation, innate immunity, and T cell repression.婴儿脓毒症严重程度的分子特征:增强的凝血、先天免疫和 T 细胞抑制。
Front Immunol. 2024 May 16;15:1281111. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1281111. eCollection 2024.
10
Retrospective analysis of pediatric sepsis and the burden of antimicrobial resistance in Duhok, Kurdistan Region of Iraq.伊拉克库尔德地区杜胡克小儿脓毒症及抗菌药物耐药负担的回顾性分析
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Feb 26;15:1347832. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1347832. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义(脓毒症-3)》
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
2
Genome-wide association study of survival from sepsis due to pneumonia: an observational cohort study.肺炎相关性脓毒症生存的全基因组关联研究:一项观察性队列研究。
Lancet Respir Med. 2015 Jan;3(1):53-60. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70290-5. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
3
Comparison of trends in sepsis incidence and coding using administrative claims versus objective clinical data.使用行政索赔数据与客观临床数据对脓毒症发病率和编码趋势进行比较。
Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Jan 1;60(1):88-95. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu750. Epub 2014 Sep 25.
4
Trends in infection source and mortality among patients with septic shock.感染性休克患者的感染源及死亡率趋势
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Sep 15;190(6):709-10. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201406-1043LE.
5
Identification of a nonsynonymous polymorphism in the SVEP1 gene associated with altered clinical outcomes in septic shock.鉴定与脓毒性休克临床结局改变相关的SVEP1基因非同义多态性。
Crit Care Med. 2015 Jan;43(1):101-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000604.
6
Mortality related to severe sepsis and septic shock among critically ill patients in Australia and New Zealand, 2000-2012.2000-2012 年澳大利亚和新西兰重症监护病房严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者的死亡率。
JAMA. 2014 Apr 2;311(13):1308-16. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.2637.
7
Gender differences in sepsis: cardiovascular and immunological aspects.脓毒症中的性别差异:心血管和免疫学方面。
Virulence. 2014 Jan 1;5(1):12-9. doi: 10.4161/viru.26982. Epub 2013 Nov 5.
8
Multicenter implementation of a severe sepsis and septic shock treatment bundle.多中心实施严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克治疗捆绑包。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Jul 1;188(1):77-82. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201212-2199OC.
9
Changes in hospital mortality for United States intensive care unit admissions from 1988 to 2012.1988年至2012年美国重症监护病房收治患者的医院死亡率变化。
Crit Care. 2013 Apr 27;17(2):R81. doi: 10.1186/cc12695.
10
Sepsis definitions: time for change.脓毒症的定义:是时候改变了。
Lancet. 2013 Mar 2;381(9868):774-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61815-7.