Suppr超能文献

社区中与自我报告的骨质疏松症准确性相关的因素。

Factors associated with the accuracy of self-reported osteoporosis in the community.

作者信息

Cunningham Tina D, DeShields Sarah C

机构信息

The Center for Health Analytics and Discovery, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Harry Lester Building, 651 Colley Avenue, Norfolk, VA, 23507, USA.

出版信息

Rheumatol Int. 2016 Dec;36(12):1633-1640. doi: 10.1007/s00296-016-3573-5. Epub 2016 Oct 6.

Abstract

We examined the agreement between self-reported osteoporosis and bone mineral density (BMD) results through dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) using data from a national representative sample taken from the US communities. Six-year data from the continuous National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005-2006, 2007-2008, and 2009-2010 were merged. Participants included adults 50 years of age or older whose data appeared in both questionnaire and medical examination data files. Self-reported osteoporosis was defined by an affirmative response to a question in the osteoporosis questionnaire then compared with BMD-defined osteoporosis, defined by BMD values taken from the examination data. Agreement between self-reported osteoporosis and DXA results were low. Kappa was only 0.24 (95 % confidence interval = 0.21-0.27), and sensitivity and positive predictive value were 28.0 and 40.8 %, respectively. When stratified by gender or age group, agreement remained poor. Self-report of osteoporosis would not be suitable for accurate prevalence estimates for osteoporosis regardless of gender or age group.

摘要

我们利用取自美国社区的全国代表性样本数据,通过双能X线吸收法(DXA)检测了自我报告的骨质疏松症与骨矿物质密度(BMD)结果之间的一致性。合并了2005 - 2006年、2007 - 2008年和2009 - 2010年连续的国家健康和营养检查调查的六年数据。参与者包括年龄在50岁及以上、其数据同时出现在问卷调查和医学检查数据文件中的成年人。自我报告的骨质疏松症由骨质疏松症问卷中的一个问题的肯定回答定义,然后与由检查数据中的BMD值定义的BMD定义的骨质疏松症进行比较。自我报告的骨质疏松症与DXA结果之间的一致性较低。kappa值仅为0.24(95%置信区间 = 0.21 - 0.27),敏感性和阳性预测值分别为28.0%和40.8%。按性别或年龄组分层时,一致性仍然较差。无论性别或年龄组如何,骨质疏松症的自我报告都不适用于准确估计骨质疏松症的患病率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验