Bhan Nandita, Rao Krishna Dipankar, Kachwaha Shivani
Public Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India.
Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA.
Int J Equity Health. 2016 Oct 6;15(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0457-y.
Research on health inequalities can be instrumental in drawing attention to the health of socioeconomically vulnerable groups in India in the context of rapid economic growth. It can shape the dialogue for public health action, emphasizing the need for greater investments in health, and monitor effectiveness of health programs. Our objective was to examine trends in studies on health inequalities in the last 25 years.
We conducted a systematic literature review of studies on health inequalities published from 1990. The year, 1990, marked the beginning of economic reforms and liberalization in India. We searched PubMED using key terms to identify 8800 articles between 1990 and 2016; we identified 1,312 final studies for review. Key domains of analysis included measures of equity, health outcomes, populations studied, year of publication, study methodology, study focus (descriptive versus analytical), and location of main author.
We found an increase in studies on health inequalities after 2005. About 88 % of the studies utilized quantitative methods for analysis. About 8 % of the studies related to health interventions or programs; the number of intervention studies have been increasing since 2010. A majority of studies were led by authors based in India. Early studies focused on mortality, communicable and non-communicable diseases, and nutrition, while later studies have focused on non-communicable diseases, mental health, risk factors, and injuries. Studies on women and children comprised nearly half of the literature; studies on the youth (15-24 years or as defined by the study) and elderly have been rising. Wealth and income were the most common measures of equity, followed by education and gender. The proportion of studies on wealth, education, region and caste have stayed consistent over time, while studies on gender disparities have been rising.
In a country as diverse as India with large social inequalities combined with rapid economic growth, research on health inequalities has a special significance for policy. We recommend that studies on health inequalities in the future focus on evaluations of policy and health programs, and on underrepresented health outcomes and populations.
在印度经济快速增长的背景下,健康不平等研究有助于引起人们对社会经济弱势群体健康状况的关注。它可以塑造公共卫生行动的对话,强调加大对健康投资的必要性,并监测健康项目的有效性。我们的目标是研究过去25年中健康不平等研究的趋势。
我们对1990年以来发表的健康不平等研究进行了系统的文献综述。1990年标志着印度经济改革和自由化的开始。我们在PubMed上使用关键词搜索,以识别1990年至2016年间的8800篇文章;我们确定了1312项最终研究进行综述。分析的关键领域包括公平性衡量指标、健康结果、研究人群、发表年份、研究方法、研究重点(描述性与分析性)以及主要作者的所在地。
我们发现2005年后健康不平等研究有所增加。约88%的研究采用定量方法进行分析。约8%的研究与健康干预或项目相关;自2010年以来,干预研究的数量一直在增加。大多数研究由印度作者主导。早期研究主要关注死亡率、传染病和非传染病以及营养,而后期研究则侧重于非传染病、心理健康、风险因素和伤害。关于妇女和儿童的研究占文献的近一半;关于青年(15 - 24岁或根据研究定义)和老年人的研究一直在增加。财富和收入是最常用的公平性衡量指标,其次是教育和性别。关于财富、教育、地区和种姓的研究比例随时间保持一致,而关于性别差异的研究一直在增加。
在像印度这样社会不平等巨大且经济快速增长的多元化国家,健康不平等研究对政策具有特殊意义。我们建议未来的健康不平等研究应侧重于政策和健康项目的评估,以及关注未得到充分研究的健康结果和人群。