• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与药品相关的政策干预措施:2010 - 2015年欧洲国家采取的措施调查。

Policy interventions related to medicines: Survey of measures taken in European countries during 2010-2015.

作者信息

Vogler Sabine, Zimmermann Nina, de Joncheere Kees

机构信息

WHO Collaborating Centre for Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement Policies, Pharmacoeconomics Department, Gesundheit Österreich GmbH (Austrian Public Health Institute), Vienna, Austria.

WHO Collaborating Centre for Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement Policies, Pharmacoeconomics Department, Gesundheit Österreich GmbH (Austrian Public Health Institute), Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2016 Dec;120(12):1363-1377. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.09.006. Epub 2016 Sep 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.09.006
PMID:27720165
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Policy-makers can use a menu of pharmaceutical policy options. This study aimed to survey these measures that were implemented in European countries between 2010 and 2015.

METHODS

We did bi-annual surveys with competent authorities of the Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement Information network. Additionally, we consulted posters produced by members of this network as well as further published literature. Information on 32 European countries (all European Union Member States excluding Luxembourg; Iceland, Norway, Serbia, Switzerland, Turkey) was included.

RESULTS

557 measures were reported between January 2010 and December 2015. The most frequently mentioned measure was price reductions and price freezes, followed by changes in patient co-payments, modifications related to the reimbursement lists and changes in distribution remuneration. Most policy measures were identified in Portugal, Greece, Belgium, France, the Czech Republic, Iceland, Spain and Germany. 22% of the measures surveyed could be classified as austerity.

CONCLUSIONS

Countries that were strongly hit by the financial crisis implemented most policy changes, usually aiming to generate savings and briefly after the emergence of the crisis. Improvements in the economic situation tended to lead to an easing of austerity measures. Countries also implemented policies that aimed to enhance enforcement of existing measures and increase efficiency.

摘要

背景

政策制定者可以采用一系列药品政策选项。本研究旨在调查2010年至2015年期间在欧洲国家实施的这些措施。

方法

我们每半年对药品定价和报销信息网络的主管当局进行一次调查。此外,我们查阅了该网络成员制作的海报以及其他已发表的文献。纳入了32个欧洲国家(所有欧盟成员国,不包括卢森堡;冰岛、挪威、塞尔维亚、瑞士、土耳其)的信息。

结果

2010年1月至2015年12月期间共报告了557项措施。最常提及的措施是降价和价格冻结,其次是患者自付费用的变化、与报销清单相关的修改以及配送报酬的变化。大多数政策措施在葡萄牙、希腊、比利时、法国、捷克共和国、冰岛、西班牙和德国被确定。所调查的措施中有22%可归类为紧缩措施。

结论

受金融危机冲击严重的国家实施的政策变化最多,通常旨在在危机出现后短期内节省开支。经济形势的改善往往会导致紧缩措施的放松。各国还实施了旨在加强现有措施执行力度和提高效率的政策。

相似文献

1
Policy interventions related to medicines: Survey of measures taken in European countries during 2010-2015.与药品相关的政策干预措施:2010 - 2015年欧洲国家采取的措施调查。
Health Policy. 2016 Dec;120(12):1363-1377. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.09.006. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
2
Pharmaceutical policies in European countries in response to the global financial crisis.欧洲国家应对全球金融危机的药品政策。
South Med Rev. 2011 Dec;4(2):69-79. doi: 10.5655/smr.v4i2.1004. Epub 2011 Dec 2.
3
Effect of the economic recession on pharmaceutical policy and medicine sales in eight European countries.经济衰退对八个欧洲国家药品政策和药品销售的影响。
Bull World Health Organ. 2014 Sep 1;92(9):630-640D. doi: 10.2471/BLT.13.129114. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
4
How Can Pricing and Reimbursement Policies Improve Affordable Access to Medicines? Lessons Learned from European Countries.定价与报销政策如何提高药品的可及性?从欧洲国家汲取的经验教训。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2017 Jun;15(3):307-321. doi: 10.1007/s40258-016-0300-z.
5
Price comparison of high-cost originator medicines in European countries.欧洲国家高成本原研药的价格比较。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2017 Apr;17(2):221-230. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2016.1223543. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
6
Inequalities in medicine use in Central Eastern Europe: an empirical investigation of socioeconomic determinants in eight countries.中东欧地区药物使用的不平等现象:对八个国家社会经济决定因素的实证研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2015 Nov 5;14:124. doi: 10.1186/s12939-015-0261-0.
7
Drug Policy in Romania.罗马尼亚的毒品政策。
Value Health Reg Issues. 2018 Sep;16:28-32. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2017.11.003. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
8
Drug Policy in Greece.希腊的毒品政策。
Value Health Reg Issues. 2018 Sep;16:66-73. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2018.06.006. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
9
Cancer drugs in 16 European countries, Australia, and New Zealand: a cross-country price comparison study.16 个欧洲国家、澳大利亚和新西兰的癌症药物:一项国家间价格比较研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jan;17(1):39-47. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00449-0. Epub 2015 Dec 4.
10
Fighting trafficking of falsified and substandard medicinal products in Russia.打击俄罗斯假药和劣药的非法交易。
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2015;27 Suppl 1:S37-40. doi: 10.3233/JRS-150681.

引用本文的文献

1
Prescribing patterns before the initiation of novel antidiabetic medicines in public, occupational, and private healthcare: a register study reflecting the guidelines of care in type 2 diabetes.公共、职业和私人医疗保健领域新型抗糖尿病药物启用前的处方模式:一项反映2型糖尿病护理指南的登记研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec 5;24(1):1553. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12010-y.
2
Trends in the Cost of Medicines, Consultation Fees and Clinic Visits in Malaysia's Private Primary Healthcare System: Employer Health Insurance Coverage.马来西亚私立基层医疗保健系统中药品成本、诊疗费和门诊就诊的趋势:雇主医疗保险覆盖情况
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 Jun 17;16:1683-1697. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S403589. eCollection 2023.
3
Austerity, economic hardship and access to medications: a repeated cross-sectional population survey study, 2013-2020.
紧缩政策、经济困难与药物获取:2013-2020 年的重复横断面人群调查研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2023 Mar;77(3):160-167. doi: 10.1136/jech-2022-219706. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
4
Classification of Pharmaceutical Policy Measures During the Portuguese Financial Crisis.葡萄牙金融危机期间的药物政策措施分类。
Inquiry. 2022 Jan-Dec;59:469580221093171. doi: 10.1177/00469580221093171.
5
A systematic review of pharmaceutical price mark-up practice and its implementation.药品价格加成实践及其实施的系统评价。
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2021 May 6;2:100020. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2021.100020. eCollection 2021 Jun.
6
Citizens' opinions and experiences related to costs and reimbursements for medications in times of retrenchment: cross-sectional population surveys in 2015 and 2017.公民对紧缩时期药物费用和报销的意见和经验:2015 年和 2017 年的横断面人口调查。
Int J Equity Health. 2022 Mar 9;21(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12939-022-01631-6.
7
The effect of pharmaceutical co-payment increase on the use of social assistance-A natural experiment study.药品共付额增加对社会救助使用的影响——一项自然实验研究。
PLoS One. 2021 May 5;16(5):e0250305. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250305. eCollection 2021.
8
Implementation of medicines pricing policies in sub-Saharan Africa: protocol for a systematic review.撒哈拉以南非洲地区药品定价政策的实施:一项系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 23;11(2):e044293. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044293.
9
Is greater generic competition also linked to lower drug prices in South Korea?在韩国,更大程度的仿制药竞争也与更低的药品价格有关联吗?
Health Econ Rev. 2020 Sep 15;10(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13561-020-00289-6.
10
Quantitative measures of health policy implementation determinants and outcomes: a systematic review.卫生政策实施决定因素及结果的定量评估:一项系统综述
Implement Sci. 2020 Jun 19;15(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01007-w.