Vogler Sabine, Zimmermann Nina, Leopold Christine, de Joncheere Kees
Health Economics Department, WHO Collaborating Centre for Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement Policies, Gesundheit Österreich GmbH / Geschäftsbereich ÖBIG - Austrian Health Institute, Vienna, Austria.
South Med Rev. 2011 Dec;4(2):69-79. doi: 10.5655/smr.v4i2.1004. Epub 2011 Dec 2.
The objective of this paper is to analyze which pharmaceutical policies European countries applied during the global financial crisis.
We undertook a survey with officials from public authorities for pharmaceutical pricing and reimbursement of 33 European countries represented in the PPRI (Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement Information) network based on a questionnaire. The survey was launched in September 2010 and repeated in February 2011 to obtain updated information.
During the survey period from January 2010 to February 2011, 89 measures were identified in 23 of the 33 countries surveyed which were implemented to contain public medicines expenditure. Price reductions, changes in the co-payments, in the VAT rates on medicines and in the distribution margins were among the most common measures. More than a dozen countries reported measures under discussion or planned, for the remaining year 2011 and beyond. The largest number of measures were implemented in Iceland, the Baltic states (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania), Greece, Spain and Portugal, which were hit by the crisis at different times.
Cost-containment has been an issue for high-income countries in Europe - no matter if hit by the crisis or not. In recent months, changes in pharmaceutical policies were reported from 23 European countries. Measures which can be implemented rather swiftly (e.g. price cuts, changes in co-payments and VAT rates on medicines) were among the most frequent measures. While the "crisis countries" (e.g. Baltic states, Greece, Spain) reacted with a bundle of measures, reforms in other countries (e.g. Poland, Germany) were not directly linked to the crisis, but also aimed at containing public spending. Since further reforms are under way, we recommend that the monitoring exercise is continued.
本文旨在分析欧洲国家在全球金融危机期间实施了哪些药品政策。
我们基于一份问卷,对药品定价与报销公共机构的官员进行了调查,这些官员来自参与药品定价与报销信息(PPRI)网络的33个欧洲国家。该调查于2010年9月启动,并于2011年2月重复进行以获取最新信息。
在2010年1月至2011年2月的调查期间,在所调查的33个国家中的23个国家发现了89项旨在控制公共药品支出的措施。降价、共付额变化、药品增值税税率变化以及分销利润率变化是最常见的措施。十几个国家报告了在2011年及以后仍在讨论或计划实施的措施。措施实施数量最多的国家是冰岛、波罗的海国家(爱沙尼亚、拉脱维亚、立陶宛)、希腊、西班牙和葡萄牙,这些国家在不同时期受到危机冲击。
成本控制一直是欧洲高收入国家面临的一个问题——无论是否受到危机影响。近几个月来,有23个欧洲国家报告了药品政策的变化。能够较快实施的措施(如降价、共付额变化和药品增值税税率变化)是最常见的措施。虽然“危机国家”(如波罗的海国家、希腊、西班牙)采取了一系列措施,但其他国家(如波兰、德国)的改革并非直接与危机相关,而是也旨在控制公共支出。由于进一步的改革正在进行,我们建议继续开展监测工作。